search for




 

Development of an efficient protocol for high-frequency regeneration system in Hibiscus syriacus L.
J Plant Biotechnol 2017;44:164-170
Published online June 30, 2017
© 2017 The Korean Society for Plant Biotechnology.

Sang-Gyu Seo, Sun-Hee Ryu, Yang Zhou, and Sun-Hyung Kim*

Department of Environmental Horticulture, The University of Seoul, Seoulsiripdae-ro 163, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 130-743, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to: e-mail: kimmads3327@gmail.com
Received June 21, 2017; Revised June 21, 2017; Accepted June 21, 2017.
cc This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract

A rapid and efficient in vitro regeneration system was established for Hibiscus syriacus L. The successful regeneration protocol employs induction of shoot organogenesis on leaf, petiole, and root explants. Among the various plant growth regulators evaluated, thidiazuron (TDZ) was the most effective for inducing rapid shoot formation. Most efficient shoot regeneration frequency was obtained from Murashige and Skoog (MS) media containing 0.01 mg/L TDZ. Regeneration efficiency was highest in the roots, and lowest in the leaves. A combination of 0.01 mg/L TDZ with benzyladenine (BAP) markedly improved the frequency of shoot differentiation from the root (up to 98%) and petiole (up to 88%) explants. Furthermore, leaf and petiole explants showed the highest frequency of shoot induction in half-strength MS media containing 0.01 mg/L TDZ and 1.0 mg/L BAP, while root explants formed the greatest number of shoots when 0.01 mg/L TDZ and 0.1 mg/L BAP were added to half-strength MS media. Although the frequency of shoot differentiation from leaf explants was only 50%, the leaf is considered the most efficient plant organ for use in tissue culture because leaves are easier to obtain than roots and petioles. Our findings show that various organs of H. syriacus can be used for plant regeneration, and the protocol developed in this study may be applicable in the horticulture industry.

Keywords : Hibiscus syriacus L. leaf explant, petiole explant, root explant, shoot differentiation, thidiazuron
Introduction

Hibiscus syriacus L., the national flower of Korea, is a common ornamental plant found in gardens and parks and along roadsides in Korea. It also has various economically important uses such as in the production of fiber and as a beverage additive in some Asian countries (Hotta et al. 1989). H. syriacus is commonly propagated using cuttings (Govinden-Soulange et al. 2009), which offer several advantages, such as the regeneration of clones, convenience of propagation, combination of genotypes, and reduction in length of the juvenile period (Hartman et al. 1994). However, this method is slow, requires considerable space, and relies on cuttings from mother plants. Propagation through seeds is not a viable option, as the germination percentage is low and seed-propagated plants may display undesirable traits and lack uniformity. Thus, this commercially valuable species may benefit from the development of an efficient and low-cost protocol for large-scale in vitro multiplication. Previous studies explored the propagation of H. syriacus through plant regeneration using shoot tips (Kim et al. 1998; Jeon et al. 2009; Yoo et al. 1996), embryos (Peak et al. 1989), and protoplasts (Zhao et al. 1991). However, regeneration efficiency is low and it is difficult to apply these methods in mass proliferation of H. syriacus. The application of tissue culture is sometimes limited by the quality and availability of the various plant materials needed to initiate the culture. Therefore, certain plant parts, such as leaves, petioles, and roots, which are more abundant and easier to procure than shoot tips, show potential for use in tissue culture. The objective of this study was to develop an efficient method of plant regeneration for H. syriacus using leaves, petioles, and roots and develop an efficient protocol for mass multiplication of H. syriacus.

Materials and Methods

Explant Source, Basal Medium Composition, and Experimental Conditions

In vitro plants of H. syriacus ‘Saimdang’ were used as the source of plant materials for this study. Fresh leaves, petioles, and roots cut from in vitro plants were sterilized in 70% ethanol for 30 s and washed in sterile distilled water. Next, the samples were sterilized in 1% sodium hypochlorite for 1 min and rinsed five times with sterile distilled water. Leaf explants were obtained by excising approximately 0.5 × 0.5-cm pieces from sterilized leaves and petiole and root explants were obtained by cutting 0.5-cm-long segments from sterilized petioles and roots. The explants were then placed in MS medium.

Induction of In Vitro Shoot Morphogenesis

MS basal medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962), containing 30 g/L sucrose and 3 g/L gelrite, was used for all tissue culture media. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.8 before autoclaving at 120°C for 10 min. Each explant was cultured on MS medium containing either various concentrations of the growth regulator thidiazuron (TDZ; 0.001, 0.01, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/L) alone or in combination with various concentrations of benzyladenine (BAP; 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/L) or naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA; 0.5 and 1.0 mg/L) in a dark room at a temperature of 25 ± 1°C for 3 weeks. The culture plates were then subjected to a 16-h/8-h photoperiod at room temperature (25 ± 1°C). Subculture was carried out every 4 weeks. After 7 weeks of culture, the frequency of callus induction and shoot formation was measured.

In Vitro Rooting of Regenerated Shoots

Shoots cut from plantlets cultured on the shooting medium were transferred and cultured on a rooting medium consisting of half-strength MS basal medium supplemented with various concentrations (0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg/L) of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Culture was conducted at room temperature under a 16-h/8-h photoperiod. The number of days required for root emergence to occur was measured for each rooting shoot. Each experiment was repeated three times.

Results and Discussion

Effects of Explant Source and TDZ Concentration on In Vitro Regeneration

H. syriacus is generally propagated using leaf or stem cuttings. However, this method is slow, requires considerable space, and relies on cuttings from mother plants. In vitro multiplication techniques are now effectively employed for the mass clonal multiplication of commercially important plant species, such as Saintpaulia ionantha (Lo et al. 1997; Mithila et al. 2003), Titanotrichum oldhamii (Takagi et al. 2011) and Aeschynanthus radicans (Cui et al. 2009). The goal of the present study was to develop a simple and efficient propagation protocol for rapid in vitro multiplication of H. syriacus utilizing TDZ, a potent plant growth regulator (PGR) known to induce shoot morphogenesis and somatic embryogenesis (SE) in vitro. In vitro regeneration was achieved successfully through either SE or shoot organogenesis in H. syriacus by using different explants cultured on a range of PGRs, alone or in combination. Shoot organogenesis and SE modulated by TDZ are well-documented in many plant species (Hutchinson et al. 1996; Murthy et al. 1998; Murch and Saxena 2001; Jones et al. 2007). TDZ used alone at low concentrations induced shoot organogenesis and at high concentrations induced in African violet (S.ionantha) (Mithila et al. 2003; Taha et al. 2009) and Ochna integerrima (Ma et al. 2011). Preliminary tests revealed that calluses were not formed when explants were cultured on MS medium containing either 2.0 or 5.0 mg/L 2,4-D (data not shown), whereas all explants cultured on MS medium containing 0.01 mg/L TDZ produced friable, compact, and yellowish calluses (Fig. 1). After a few weeks, several calluses produced multiple shoots. While root explants showed particularly efficient callus and shoot formation, leaf explants did not form shoots. Although TDZ is classified as a type of cytokinin, it is chemically very different from the auxins and cytokinins that are generally used to induce callus and shoot formation, and exerts both auxin- and cytokinin-like effects (Guo et al. 2011). Previous studies have shown that TDZ is much more effective than any other cytokinin for inducing the production of multiple shoots (Bates et al. 1992; Fellman et al. 1987; Neuman et al. 1988; Visser et al. 1992). However, several studies reported that although TDZ induced shoot growth, it did not support continuous shoot elongation (Yoo et al. 1996). In our study, TDZ was more efficient than 2,4-D in triggering callus and shoot formation. The treatment of explants with various concentrations of TDZ showed that high TDZ concentrations induced the formation of larger calli than that by low TDZ concentrations (Fig. 2 and Table 1). However, explants treated with high concentrations of TDZ produced calli that turned yellow in color and stopped growing. In contrast, low TDZ concentrations (0.01 mg/L) resulted in the formation of multiple shoots. In the case of leaf explants, although TDZ concentrations of 0.5 and 1.0 mg/L were effective for inducing callus formation (Table 1), the calli did not produce shoots. Similarly, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/L TDZ concentrations induced callus formation in petiole and root explants (Table 1). However, 0.01 mg/L TDZ was the most effective concentration for causing shoot formation. At high concentrations, TDZ produced calli in nearly all explants of the Saimdang cultivar. Statistically, both callus formation and shoot formation were the highest at a TDZ concentration of 0.01 mg/L; however, callus formation was completely suppressed at TDZ concentrations higher than 0.01 mg/L.TDZ and at low concentrations. Our study showed that by using low levels of TDZ, leaf, petiole, and root explants can be used for in vitro regeneration of H. syriacus (Fig. 1).

Effects of TDZ concentration on callus induction and shoot formation in leaf, petiole, and root explants of Hibiscus syriacus L. ‘Saimdang’ after 7 weeks of culture

TDZ concentration (mg/L)Leaf

Callus formationx (%)Callus growthyShoot formationz(%)No. of shoots /callus
0.00125.7 ± 3.5+0.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
0.0195.1 ± 3.3+0.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
0.50100.0 ± 0.0+11.2 ± 2.40.2 ± 0.1
1.00100.0 ± 0.0+3.8 ± 0.50.1 ± 0.0
2.0098.0 ± 1.0+++0.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0

Petiole

0.00158.7 ± 7.1+29.9 ± 8.61.8 ± 0.7
0.0162.5 ± 7.2+++58.3 ± 4.23.7 ± 0.7
0.5092.9 ± 4.1++++17.8 ± 6.20.2 ± 0.1
1.00100.0 ± 0.0+++15.7 ± 4.90.3 ± 0.1
2.00100.0 ± 0.0+++4.0 ± 2.00.1 ± 0.1

Root

0.00175.9 ± 1.3+43.2 ± 13.01.1 ± 0.4
0.0198.3 ± 0.8++93.2 ± 0.92.9 ± 0.3
0.50100.0 ± 0.0+++0.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
1.0097.9 ± 2.1+++0.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
2.0093.5 ± 1.9+++0.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0

Each value is the mean ± SE of 3 replications containing 20~30 explants per replication.

x% of explants forming callus per inoculated explant

y+: low; ++: medium; +++: high; ++++: very high.

z% of explants forming shoot per inoculated explant


Fig. 1.

Plant regeneration in explants derived from various organs of Hibiscus syriacus L. cultured on MS medium containing 0.01 mg/L TDZ


Fig. 2.

Effects of (A) TDZ concentration and (B) combinations of TDZ with BAP and NAA on callus induction and shoot formation in leaf, petiole, and root explants of Hibiscus syriacus L. ‘Saimdang’


Effect of Various PGRs on In Vitro Regeneration of H. syriacus

Shoot formation was greater in explants or calli cultured on TDZ media when low concentrations of auxins and cytokinins are added to the medium and shoot proliferation increased significantly (Huetteman and Preece 1993). Although BAP is considered the most effective cytokinin, its effectiveness is restricted to certain explant types (Tiwari et al. 2001). Kumari and Pandey (2011) reported that BAP, in combination with IAA, was the most effective cytokinin for shoot differentiation. However, high concentrations of BAP (2.0 mg/L) may inhibit growth by up to 81% of the shoots formed from the axillary buds of in vitro-germinated seedlings of H. sabdariffa L. treated with hormone-free medium, and only 33% shoot formation was recorded for seedlings treated with high concentrations of BAP (Govinden-Soulange et al. 2009). After 7 weeks of culture, treatment of explants with combinations of TDZ, BAP, and NAA showed that callus formation was the highest and shoot formation was the lowest at an NAA concentration of 0.5 mg/L (Table 2). The addition of 1.0 mg/L of BAP to the medium resulted in the highest shoot formation in leaf and petiole explants (Table 2), and the addition of 0.1 mg/L BAP resulted in higher shoot formation in root explants (Table 2). Overall, adding BAP to the medium enhanced shoot induction and formation in calluses with multiple shoots were induced in green calli treated with 0.01 mg/L TDZ and either 0.1 or 1.0 mg/L BAP.

Effects of combination of TDZ with various concentrations of plant growth regulators (BAP and NAA) on callus induction and shoot formation in leaf, petiole, and root explants of Hibiscus syriacus L. ‘Saimdang’ after 7 weeks of culture

Plant growth regulator TDZ 0.01 mg/L withLeaf

BAP (mg/L)NAA (mg/L)Callus formationx (%)Callus growthyShoot formationz(%)No. of shoots /callus
0.100.0089.9 ± 2.2++32.4 ± 8.20.7 ± 0.1
0.500.0094.4 ± 2.6++16.0 ± 6.20.3 ± 0.1
1.000.0086.1 ± 4.9++50.2 ± 2.61.8 ± 0.1
0.000.50100.0 ± 0.0++21.5 ± 11.10.3 ± 0.2
0.001.0098.9 ± 1.1+++8.0 ± 4.00.1 ± 0.1

Petiole

0.100.0069.2 ± 4.7+++49.3 ± 10.02.5 ± 0.6
0.500.0093.7 ± 6.3+++77.3 ± 4.61.7 ± 0.2
1.000.0098.2 ± 1.8+++92.3 ± 1.43.3 ± 0.5
0.000.50100.0 ± 0.0+++22.1 ± 3.80.4 ± 0.1
0.001.0095.6 ± 2.2+++33.3 ± 5.40.3 ± 0.2

Root

0.100.00100.0 ± 0.0++98.5 ± 1.53.6 ± 0.5
0.500.0098.3 ± 0.9++73.6 ± 12.01.9 ± 0.6
1.000.0095.6 ± 2.2++86.6 ± 1.42.5 ± 0.1
0.000.50100.0 ± 0.0++54.7 ± 4.30.9 ± 0.2
0.001.00100.0 ± 0.0+++41.4 ± 12.00.7 ± 0.2

Each value is the mean ± SE of 3 replications containing 25~35 explants per replication.

x% of explants forming callus per inoculated explant

y+: low; ++: medium; +++: high; ++++: very high.

z% of explants forming shoot per inoculated explant


Rooting and Acclimation of in vitro Regenerated Plants

Six concentrations of IAA were compared for their efficiency in inducing in vitro root formation. Up to 20% of the enlarged shoots developed roots on basal media without PGRs (Table 3). Our results show that rooting in H. syriacus, which typically requires 1 month, was completely dependent on exogenous auxin. Excised axillary nodes, derived from in vitro-cultured shoots, formed roots only upon transfer to hormone-free half-strength MS medium or half-strength MS medium supplemented with different concentrations of IAAs. In vitro rooting of initiated shoots occurred after approximately 18.5 days of culture on half-strength MS basal medium containing 1.0 mg/L IAA (Table 3). A single root emerged after 18 days, continued to grow linearly, and produced branches. Root emergence in media containing all other concentrations of IAA (excluding 1.0 mg/L) was delayed by 1–3 days (Table 3).

Effects of IAA concentration on rooting in micro shoots of Hibiscus syriacus L. ‘Saimdang’

 IAA concentration (mg/L)  Root emergencex (days) 
0.0021.3 ± 0.8
0.0121.8 ± 0.8
0.1019.8 ± 0.5
0.5021.0 ± 1.7
1.0018.6 ± 0.6
1.5020.8 ± 2.1

Each value is the mean ± SE of 3 replications containing 5 micro shoots per replication. Experiment was repeated three times.

xnumber of days required for root emergence from micro shoot.


In conclusion, an efficient in vitro plant propagation protocol for rapid multiplication was established for H. syriacus. Efficient in vitro plant regeneration methods are essential improving the mass production and molecular manipulation of plants. Thus, the protocol developed in this study shows potential for use in further research to manipulate and propagate H. syriacus, as well as for eventual application in the horticulture industry.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the 2014 sabbatical year research grant of the University of Seoul.

References
  1. Bates S, Navarrete JE, Sammbeek JW, and Gaffney GR. (1992) 1992 stimulates shoot organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in white ash (Fraxinus americana L). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 32, 21-29.
    CrossRef
  2. Cui J, Chen JJ, and Henny RJ. (2009) 2009 of Aeschynanthusradicans via direct somatic embryogenesis and analysis of regenerants with flow cytometry. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 45, 34-43.
    CrossRef
  3. Fellman CD, Read PE, and Hosier MA. (1987) 1987 of thidiazuron and CPPU on meristem formation and shoot proliferation. HortScience 22, 1197-1200.
  4. Govinden-Soulange J, Boodia N, Dussooa C, Gunowa R, Deensah S, Facknath S, and Rajkomar B. (2009) 2009 propagation and tissue culture regeneration of Hibiscus sabdariffa L(Roselle). World J Agric Sci 5, 651-661.
  5. Guo B, Abbasi BH, Zeb A, Xu LL, and Wei YH. (2011) 2011:A multi-dimensional plant growth regulator. Afr J Biotechnol 10, 8984-9000.
  6. Hartman BH, Kester DE, and Davies FT. (1994). 1994 propagation:principles and techniques , pp.246-247. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  7. Hotta M, Ogata K, Nitta A, Hosikawa K, Yanagi M, and Yamazaki K. (1989). 1989 plants of the world 1499. Heibonsha, Tokyo, Japan.
  8. Huetteman CA, and Preece JE. (1993) 1993:a potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 33, 105-119.
    CrossRef
  9. Hutchinson MJ, Murch SJ, and Saxena PK. (1996) 1996 role of thidiazur on:evidence of the involvement of endogenous auxin in thidiazuron-induced somatic embryogenesis of geranium (Pelargonium×hortorum Bailey). J plant physiol 149, 573-579.
    CrossRef
  10. Jeon SB, Kang SW, Kim WS, Lee GP, Kim SH, and Seo SG. (2009) 2009 vitro plant regeneration from axillary buds of Hibiscus syriacus L. J Plant Biotechnol 36, 174-178.
    CrossRef
  11. Jones MPA, Cao J, O’Brien R, Murch SJ, and Saxena PK. (2007) 2007 mode of action of thidiazuron:auxins, indoleamines, and ion channels in the regeneration of Echinacea purpurea L. Plant Cell Rep 26, 1481-1490.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Kim EK, Yoo YK, and Kim KS. (1998) 1998 of thidiazuron on callus and multiple shoot formation in shoot-tip culture of Hibiscus syriacus L. ‘Honghwarang’. Kor J Hort Sci Technol 16, 520-524.
  13. Kumari S, and Pandey R.K. (2011) In vitro plant regeneration form shoot tip explants of Hibiscus syriacus(L.). Int Q J Life Sci 6, 647-648.
  14. Lo KH, Giles KL, and Sawhney VK. (1997) 1997 of competence for shoot regeneration in leaf discs of Saintpaulia ionantha x confusa hybrids (African violet) cultured in vitro. Plant Cell Rep 16, 416-420.
    CrossRef
  15. Ma GH, Lu J, Teixeira da Silva JA, Zhang X, and Zhao J. (2011) 2011 organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis from leaf and shoot explants of Ochna integerrima(Lour). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 104, 157-162.
    CrossRef
  16. Mithila J, Hall JC, Victor JMR, and Saxena PK. (2003) 2003 induces shoot organogenesis at low concentrations and somatic embryogenesis at high concentrations on leaf and petiole explants of African violet (Saintpaulia Ionantha Wendl.). Plant Cell Rep 21, 408-414.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Murashige T, and Skoog F. (1962) 1962 revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15, 473-497.
    CrossRef
  18. Murch SJ, and Saxena PK. (2001) 2001 fate of thidiazuron and its effects on auxin transport in hypocotyls tissues of Pelargonium×hortorum Bailey. Plant Growth Regul 35, 269-275.
    CrossRef
  19. Murthy BNS, Murch SJ, and Saxena PK. (1998) 1998:A potent regulator ofin vitro plant morphogenesis. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant , 34-267.
    CrossRef
  20. Neuman MC, Preece JE, Gaffney GR, and VANSAMBEEK JW. (1988) 1988 of embryoid-like structures from immature cotyledonary tissue of black walnut (Juglansnigra L). HortScienc. , e23-807.
  21. Peak KY, Son YJ, Hwang JK, Jong SK, and Park SI. (1989) 1989 regeneration in tissue culture initiated from immature embryos of Hibiscus syriacus L. Korean J Plant Tissue Cult 16, 93-104.
  22. Taha RM, Daud N, Hasbullah NA, and Awal A. (2009) 2009 embryogenesis and production of artificial seeds in Saintapaulia ionantha Wendl. Acta Hortic 829, 331-336.
    CrossRef
  23. Takagi H, Sugawara S, Saito T, Tasaki H, Yuanxue L, Kaiyun G, Han D-S, Godo T, and Nakano M. (2011) 2011 regeneration via direct and indirect adventitious shoot formation and chromosome- doubled somaclonal variation in Titanotrichum oldhamii(Hemsl.) Solereder. Plant Biotechnol Rep 5, 187-195.
    CrossRef
  24. Tiwari V, Tiwari KN, and Singh BD. (2001) 2001 studies of cytokinins on in vitropropagation of Bacopamonniera. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 66, 9-16.
    CrossRef
  25. Visser C, Qureshi JA, Gill R, and Saxena PK. (1992) 1992 role of TDZ. Substitution of auxin and cytokinin requirement for the induction of somatic embryogenesis in geranium hypocotyl culture. Plant Physiol 99, 1704-1707.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Yoo EH, and YooYK Kim KS. (1996) 1996 of growth regulators, sucrose, light, and medium on callus and shoot formation in shoot-tip culture of Hibiscus syriacus L. ‘Honghwarang’. J Kor Soc Hort Sci 37, 317-323.
  27. Zhao YX, Yao DY, and Harris PJC. (1991) 1991 and culture of protoplasts from callus tissue of Hibiscus syriacus L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 25, 17-19.
    CrossRef


September 2017, 44 (3)
Full Text(PDF) Free

Social Network Service
Services

Cited By Articles
  • CrossRef (0)

Funding Information