J Plant Biotechnol 2019; 46(3): 143-157
Published online September 30, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2019.46.3.143
© The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology
Correspondence to : e-mail: ymkang@kiom.re.kr
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Medicinal plants are high-value natural resources that have been used as precautionary drugs by many people globally. The increasing global demand for bioactive compounds from medicinal plants has led to the overexploitation of many valuable species. One widely used approach to overcome this problem is the use of adventitious root cultures as a propagation strategy. This review examines the scientific research published globally on the application of adventitious root cultures for many medicinal plants. Adventitious roots generated under aseptic environments in suitable phytohormone-augmented medium exhibit high growth rates and production of important secondary metabolites. Parameters such as medium properties and composition, growth hormone type, and elicitation strategies for in vitro grown adventitious roots of medicinal plants, are the main topics discussed in this review. We also examine current developments in bioreactor system cultivation for plant bioactive compounds using adventitious root cultures, a technology with possible commercial applications, via several studies on adventitious root culture of medicinal plants in which bioreactor systems play a role. In conclusion, the development of adventitious root cultures for medicinal plants is highly useful because of their capability for vegetative propagation and germplasm preservation.
Keywords Adventitious root culture, bioreactor, medicinal plants, secondary metabolites
PGRs : Plant Growth Hormones
MJ : Methil Jasmonate
SA : Salisilic Acid
BTBB : Baloon-Type Bubble Bioreactor
BCB : Bubble Column Bioreactor
TIS : Temporary Immersion System
IAA : Indole-3-Acetic Acid
IBA : Indole-3-Butyric Acid
NAA : 1-Naphthaleneacetic Acid
NOA : Naphthoxyacetic acid
2,4-D : 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
PAA : Phenylacetic Acid
Medicinal plants are widely used globally as sources of raw materials in the pharmaceutical industry. Highly important bioactive compounds called plant secondary metabolites are intensively harvested from medicinal plants to improve human health and standard of life. The World Health Organization (WHO) has announced that approximately 80% of humans worldwide utilize medicinal plant materials for primary health therapy (Raskin et al. 2002). However, human activities affect natural conservation and cause much damage. The development of modern cities, severe air pollution generated by vehicles, reduction of productive land because of housing developments, and substantial exploitation of natural resources have increased the difficulties in medicinal herb cultivation. In other words, the medicinal activity and efficacy of bioactive compounds derived from medicinal plants could be weakened by environmental disturbances and physiological damage, particularly by factors preventing their stable production (Beppu et al. 2004). In addition, current medicinal plants that are grown naturally, differ from their previous state because of increased contamination with pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, and heavy metals from industrial waste. This contamination is harmful to human health and reduces the quality of the herbs. Thus, the natural production of medicinal plants cannot meet increasing market needs. Furthermore, because of the intricate structure and configuration of plant secondary metabolites, artificial chemical synthesis has generally been found to be unsuitable in terms of cost. Therefore, obtaining sufficient medicinal herbal ingredients in the right manner has become a high-priority endeavor for the advancement of the global pharmaceutical industry (Gaosheng and Jingming 2012).
The primary metabolism of plants plays the important role of the synthesis of biologically active compounds called secondary metabolites. These products are not extensively involved in plant growth and development but are needed for specific functions such as conferring protection against environmental anomalies and stresses, as well as in plant defense against pathogens and herbivores. Owing to their ability and efficacy against pathogens, secondary metabolites are widely used as pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, these bioactive compounds are also utilized as food additives and agrochemical aromatics, emphasizing their importance for human life (Oksman-Caldentey et al 2004). There are three major groups of secondary metabolites: alkaloids (nitrogen and sulfur containing compounds), terpenoids, and phenolics. Normally, secondary metabolite production relies considerably on the developmental process and the physiological state of the plant, and yields are often very low (less than 1% in dry weight) (Rao et al., 2002; Thakur et al., 2013). Therefore, the development of alternative and highly creative strategies for overall plant cultivation is a very important social and economic challenge, especially for the high-output production of biologically essential bioactive compounds. For this reason, biotechnological approaches in plant cell, tissue, and organ culture have intensively been studied over the past several decades, as a prospective technology for the cultivation and production of pharmacologically beneficial plant bioactive compounds (Rao and Ravishankar 2002).
One approach that has been widely used for medicinal plant cultivation and production of highly valued compounds is micropropagation using in vitro culture. In 1934, White proposed the theory of totipotency for the first time. Then, in 1952~1953, Steward verified the theory using carrot cells cultivated in aseptic liquid media to induce and obtain the whole plant. Thereafter, cell, tissue, and organ culture has evolved as a highly prospective technology for the cultivation and production of useful secondary metabolites derived from plants. In particular, their rapid ability to sprout and special capability for producing many secondary plant metabolites has led to the wide use of organ culture techniques such as adventitious root culture for medicinal plants (Murthy et al. 2008). Adventitious root cultures show a higher constancy in the production of highly active compounds with more rapid growth than that of cell culture (Sivakumar, 2006). In addition, bioreactor system cultivation for plant bioactive compounds using adventitious root cultures has emerged as a technology with possible commercial applications (Paek et al. 2009).
In the following highlight, the development of adventitious root culture techniques is presented and the current progress and innovation in secondary metabolites production from medicinal plants using different treatments of adventitious root cultures is reviewed and discussed.
Plant roots have been demonstrated to be a plentiful resource of highly valued secondary metabolites that can be advantageous to human health (Bais et al. 2001). Adventitious roots are plant roots that arise from any organ other than the root itself, and form either during normal development or in response to environmental stresses, such as wounding, flooding, and mineral deficiency. They grow both underground and aerially and generally develop from leaves, stem nodes, and internodes. Adventitious roots serve many important roles for the plant and help the plant to survive even in environmentally adverse conditions.
Adventitious root formation has a complex molecular process involving numerous endogenous and exogenous physiological factors (Sorin et al. 2005). According to Zhang et al. (2017a), the formation stages of adventitious root can be divided into four steps: the root pre-emergence phase that includes molecular and biochemical process alterations occurring before any cytological occurrence until the emergence of primordial roots, the early phase of root development, the massive root growth phase, and the final phase of root configuration (Fig. 1). The process of induction and differentiation in the physiological stages of rooting can be triggered by changes in endogenous auxin concentrations and external addition of specific auxins (Praveen et al. 2009).
Developmental phases on the organogenesis of adventitious root formation. There are four steps of adventitious root formation and proliferation. First is the root pre-emergence stage which includes dedifferentiation (induction), formation of root initials (initiation), development of an organized root primordia, and emergence of root primordia (elongation). In this first process, some PGRs such as auxin, cytokinin, ABA, and ethylene play a critical role in the adventitious root formation. The subsequent process is the early phase of root formation, massive root growth, and final phase of root development
During the adventitious root formation, there are many changes in the endogenous subtances level. This is mainly related to the regulation of hormone levels which might play a role in it. In this case, auxin and ethylene primarily act as activators, while cytokinin and ethylene play more roles as inhibitors (Pop et al. 2011). These hormones can help or inhibit the adventitious root formation process based on their concentration. For example, in the elongation process during the root pre-emergence phase (Fig. 1), too high auxin concentration actually inhibits the elongation process. Meanwhile, ethylene can be a counterweight that can trigger an elongation process. This occurs because the relationship between auxin and ethylene is one of the factors that can promote the formation of adventitious root (Pan et al. 2002). Gene expression for adventitious root induction in plants is fundamentally affected by a complex of microRNAs that have a significant regulatory role in controlling auxin response factors. Hormonal controls take place after new root establishment using auxins at low concentrations. A small amount of auxin is still needed for preserving and supporting root meristem, and cytokinins are required to trigger the differentiation of root tissue.
Actually, the mechanism of the adventitious root formation process is a very complicated process. Although the role of auxin in the formation of adventitious root is well known, some of the molecular processes that occur (particularly adventitious root formation-genes) are still unknown, therefore this mechanism represents an open for research area.
Adventitious root formation is one of the key steps of in vitro propagation and is used for the cultivation and production of many plant crops, including medicinal plants. Recent advances in propagation techniques have resulted in the production of high amounts of biologically active compounds, such as phenols, terpenoids, and alkaloids using plant cell, tissue, as well as organs cultures (Gantet et al. 1998). Due to their rapid growth and stable metabolite productivity, adventitious root cultures are considered the most promising method for biomass production (Carvalho and Curtis 1998). Root cultures frequently show better biosynthetic ability than plant cell suspension cultures, which have low yields of secondary metabolites (Kevers et al. 1999). For instance, adventitious roots of important medicinal plants raised by micropropagation display increased biomass proliferation, accumulation potential, and bioactive compounds production. Hence, in vitro culture of adventitious roots has the potential to be developed as a strategy for large-scale bioactive compound production. Moreover, plant roots are the main raw materials that contribute to herbal drug preparations, accounting for about 60% of herbal medicinal plants applied for ethno-medicine needs. Therefore, adventitious root culture establishment is highly useful because of its capability for micropropagation and germplasm preservation (Sudha and Seeni 2001).
Adventitious roots show better growth rates and constant production of secondary metabolites when induced under an aseptic artificial environment in the optimal phytohormone-augmented medium (Hahn et al. 2003). These roots generate high amounts of alkaloids, terpenoids, and phenols in their cell and tissue spaces and show high stability and growth rates, which can be easily produced in a suitable hormone-supplemented medium with a low quantity of inoculum (Sivakumar et al. 2006).
In some plant species, hairy root culture techniques using
Adventitious root cultures can be induced from field grown explants, in vitro grown explants, or from calluses. The types and combination of Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs) used play important roles in adventitious root culture formation. Lately, combinations of handling in cultivation processes such as elicitor supplementation, medium condition optimization, adjustment of precursor feeding, and bioreactor application are being studied for the generation of high-yield secondary metabolites. The development of adventitious root cultures by applying machine-driven bioreactor technology for all kinds of pharmacologically beneficial plants is important for the cultivation and production in huge quantities of plant-derived biologically active compounds to be used in various types of human healthcare and cosmetic products.
A list of pharmacologically valuable medicinal herbs where adventitious roots have been developed using various treatments and improvements for efficient and effective production of highly useful bioactive compounds has been compiled in Table 1.
Table 1 List of medicinal plant species wherein adventitious roots have been developed through the exposure of various treatments and optimization strategies
No. | Plant Species | Secondary Metabolites | Optimized Conditions (Media & PGRs) | Applied Bioreactor Types | Bioreactor Optimization Strategies | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Aloe-emodin & Chrysophanol | B5 +0.5 mg/L NAA+ 0.2 mg/L BA | - | - | Lee et al. 2011; 2013 | |
2 | Andrographolide | MS+ 2.7 µM NAA | - | - | Praveen et al. 2009 | |
3 | Pinostrobin | MS+0.5 mg/L NAA | - | - | Azhar et al. 2018; Yusuf et al. 2018 | |
4 | Catechin & Caffeine | ½ MS | - | - | Kim et al. 2013 | |
5 | Asiaticoside | MS+7 mg/L IBA | - | - | Ling et al. 2009 | |
6 | Stigmasterol & Hecogenin | MS+3 mg/L IBA | - | - | Bathoju and Giri 2012 | |
7 | Resinoid | MS+0.5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Nagarajan et al. 2011 | |
8 | Eugenol & Farnesol | ½ MS+2 mg/L IBA | - | - | Manokari and Shekhawa 2016 | |
9 | Flavonoid | ½ MS+2 mg/L IBA | - | - | Wu et al. 2006 | |
10 | Caffeic acid derivates | ½ MS+1 mg/L IBA | BTBB | •Media replenishment: 0.5 MS | Wu et al. 2007 | |
•Aeration rate: 0.1 vvm | ||||||
11 | Quassinoid | MS+3 mg/L NAA | - | - | Hussein et al. 2012 | |
12 | Apigenin, Gallic acid, Rutin | MS+1 mg/L NAA | - | - | Khan et al. 2017 | |
13 | Kaempfrerol & Myricetin | MS+3 mg/L NAA+1 mg/L IBA | BTBB & TIS Bioreactor | A. BTBB | Faizah et al. 2018 | |
•Aeration rate: 0.2 vvm | ||||||
B. TIS Bioreactor | ||||||
•Immersion frequency: 15 min each 12 h | ||||||
•Sucrose concentration: 5% | ||||||
14 | Hypericin, Quercetin, Hyperoside | MS+1 mg/L IBA | BTBB | •Inoculum density: 6 g/L FW | Cui et al. 2010 | |
•Sucrose concentration: 3% | ||||||
•Aeration volume: 0.1 vvm | ||||||
15 | Flavonoids & Phenolics | MS+5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Hasan et al. 2014 | |
16 | Luffin | MS+1 mg/L IBA+1 mg/L NAA | - | - | Umamaheswari et al. 2014 | |
17 | 2-hydroxy-4-methoxy benzaldehyde | MS+2.5 µM IAA | - | - | Baskaran et al. 2016 | |
18 | Antrhaquinones, Phenolic, Flavonoid | MS+5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Baque et al. 2012 | |
19 | Rosmarinic acid | MS+3 mg/L IAA | - | - | Ling et al. 2009 | |
20 | Ginsenoside | MS+25 µM IBA | BTBB | •Co-culture system | Wu et al. 2008 | |
•Co-culture Inoculum ratio 4:1 | ||||||
21 | Ginsenoside | MS+3 mg/L IBA+1 mg/L NAA | - | - | Wang et al. 2016 | |
22 | Tanshinone | MS+2 mg/L NAA | - | - | Zaker et al. 2015 | |
23 | Podophyllotoxin | MS+1.5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Rajesh et al. 2012 | |
24 | Antrhaquinones, Phenolic, Flavonoid | MS+9.4 µM IBA | BTBB | •Culture period: 4 weeks | Ho et al. 2017, 2018 | |
25 | Prunellin | MS+0.5 mg/L NAA | - | - | Fazal et al. 2014 | |
26 | Triterpenoid Saponin | B5+0.05 mg/L IBA+0.1 mg/L NAA | - | - | Zhang et al. 2017b | |
27 | Psoralen | MS+3 µM IBA | - | - | Baskaran and Jayabalan N 2009 | |
28 | Anthocyanin | MS+0.5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Betsui et al. 2004 | |
39 | Antrhaquinones, Phenolic | MS | - | - | Bicer et al. 2017 | |
30 | Antrhaquinones, Flavonoids | MS+5 µM NAA | - | - | Mahdieh et al. 2015 | |
31 | Scopolamine | B5+0.1 mg/L IBA | Bubble Column Bioreactor | •Inoculum density: 3 g/L | Kang et al. 2004; Jung et al. 2003; Min et al. 2007 | |
•Aeration rates: 0.4 vvm | ||||||
•Culture period: 3 weeks | ||||||
32 | Silymarin | MS+2 mg/L IBA | - | - | Riasat et al. 2015 | |
33 | Saponin | MS+2 mg/L IBA | BTBB | NaHCO3 supplementation | Solim et al. 2017 | |
34 | sesquiterpene lactones | ½ MS+2 mg/L IBA | - | - | Khalafalla et al. 2009 | |
35 | Whitanolide | ½ MS+ 0.5 mg/L IBA+0.25 mg/L IAA | - | - | Thilip et al. 2015 |
Optimal growth and morphogenesis of tissues may vary among different plants according to their nutritional requirements. For this reason, there are many factors influencing the optimal conditions for adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. These factors include the type and strength of the media used, the category, concentration, and characteristics of carbon source supplied, pH adjustment, and inoculum density. Various culture media are widely used for secondary metabolite studies to optimize nutritional requirements for the induction and proliferation of plant cells, tissues, and organs (Park et al. 2004). Diverse categories of media have significantly different effects on the growth and development of in vitro grown adventitious roots. Furthermore, various media properties such as media type, media salt strength, sucrose composition, and pH have been applied and broadly studied in terms of organ cultures, particularly in the adventitious root cultivation of herbal plants.
Different types of culture media have various effects on induction and proliferation of adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. It has been reported, MS media was very suitable for the induction and proliferation of the adventitious root culture of
In addition to choice of media used, the concentration of carbon sources needed for adventitious roots formation also varies for each species of medicinal plants. This happens because the ability of each plant species to absorb and process carbon source metabolism varies between one another. For example, 50 g/L sucrose concentration was very suitable for adventitious root culture of
A study on the effect of sucrose concentrations for optimizing the adventitious root culture of medicinal plants was also undertaken for
The formation of adventitious roots mainly depends on anatomical status. Induction and differentiation pathways in the rooting process can be stimulated by artificially providing certain auxin hormones (Praveen et al. 2009). In addition, physiological stages of rooting can be affected by changes in endogenous auxin concentrations (Fig. 1). Auxin is a plant hormone that has several functions in different cellular processes, especially in controlling the growth, development and proliferation of a plant cell. This hormone comes from the amino acid tryptophan. The most widely distributed auxin and has been widely used, namely indoleacetic acid (IAA) and indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). After successfully studied the original structure of auxin, the scientist then succeeded in making artificial auxin called synthetic growth regulators. Two types of auxin synthetic which play a role in the rooting process, for example 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D).
Many studies have also shown that the efficacy of diverse auxins for the establishment and propagation of in vitro grown adventitious roots varies by the family and species of the plant (Baskaran and Jayabalan 2009). In addition, the type of auxin also greatly influences the process of induction and proliferation of the adventitious root culture. Based on various reports presented in table 1, IBA is the most suitable auxin for induction and development of adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. IBA, compared to other types of auxin, is a hormone that is very suitable for the adventitious root culture of
Besides IBA, NAA also has a significant influence on induction and proliferation of adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. It has been reported that NAA is the best auxin hormone for establishment of adventurous root culture of
Compared to IBA and NAA, the naturally occurring auxin hormone IAA apparently has the lowest efficacy in promoting adventitious root culture of medicinal plant. IAA only superior when its applied for the establishment of adventititous root culture of
Stress levels are an important factor for the growth and development of medicinal plants, especially for secondary metabolite accumulation and therapeutic activity. Plant stress responses can be actively stimulated using elicitation techniques to generate the desired metabolic process response in the biosynthetic pathway. Stress factors that raise or enhance the biosynthesis of a specific secondary metabolite compound when applied in small quantities are called elicitors. The specific compounds influenced by elicitors have a significant role in the adaptation of plants to environmental pressure. Elicitation is considered the most practical and feasible strategy among several biotechnological approaches that have been studied and employed for productivity improvement of appealing biologically active compounds from cells, organs, and whole plant components. In general, there are two groups of elicitors, namely, biotic and abiotic elicitors. Biotic elicitors are substances of biological origin such as fungi, bacteria, yeast, and polysaccharides derived from the plant cell walls (e.g., cellulose, pectin, and chitin). However, abiotic elicitors include substances of non-biological origin and are grouped as hormonal, physical, and chemical factors. The explanations below summarize the studies of in vitro grown adventitious roots of medicinal plants in which elicitation strategies played a role (Table 2).
Table 2 List of medicinal plant species wherein elicitation strategies have been applied into adventitious root cultures
No. | Species | Secondary Metabolites | Applied Elicitors | Highest Increment of Metabolite Yield | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Aloe-emodin & Chrysophanol | SA, MJ, Ethephon | •Aloe-emodin Increased approximately 10-fold by SA | Lee et al. 2013 | |
•Chrysophanol increased 5-13 fold by SA | |||||
2 | Apigenin, Rutin | MJ & PAA | •Apigenin increased 1.6-fold by MJ | Khan et al. 2017 | |
•Gallic acid increased 5.3-fold by MJ | |||||
3 | Kaempfrerol & Quercetin | Saccharomiyces sereviciae, CuSO4 | •Kaempferol increased 13.3-fold by CuSO4 | Faizah et al. 2018 | |
•Querectin increased 1.9-fold by | |||||
4 | Phenols | MJ, SA, Lactabumin hydrolysate | •Total Phenolic compounds increased 1.2-fold by MJ | Cui et al. 2010 | |
5 | Antrhaquinones, Phenolic, Flavonoid | Chitosan & Pectin | •Antrhaquinones increased 1.4-fold by chitosan | Baque et al. 2012 | |
•Phenolic increased 1.08-fold by chitosan | |||||
•Flavonoid increased 1.12-fold by chitosan | |||||
6 | Ginsenoside | MJ | •Ginsenoside increased 8-fold | Wu et al. 2008 | |
7 | Ginsenoside | MJ | •Ginsenoside increased 5.24-fold | Wang et al. 2016 | |
8 | Tanshinone | MJ,AgNO3, Sorbitol, Yeast Extract | •Cryptotanshinone increased 3.63-fold by Yeast Extract | Zaker et al. 2015 | |
•Tanshinone IIA increased 1.91-fold by AgNO3 | |||||
9 | Phenolic | MJ, SA, Yeast Extract, Chitosan | •Total phenolic increased 1.42-fold by MJ | Ho et al. 2018 | |
10 | Triterpenoid Saponin | Oxalic acid | •Total saponin increased 1.65 fold | Zhang et al. 2017b | |
11 | Antrhaquinones | MJ & Caffeic acid | •Total Antrhaquinones increased 2-fold by combination of MJ & Caffeic acid | Bicer et al. 2017 | |
12 | Scopolamine | MJ, SA, Bacteria | •Scopolamine increased approximately 1.4-fold by MJ | Kang et al. 2004; Jung et al. 2003 | |
•Hyosiamine increased approximately 2.2-fold by MJ |
Some abiotic elicitors such as MJ, SA, CuSO4, AgNO3, sorbitol, caffeic acid, oxalic acid, phenyl acetic acid (PAA), and ethephon have been applied to improve the biosynthesis and accumulation of secondary metabolites produced by adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. Almost all the studies that have been carried out, aim to compare the various types and concentrations of elicitor in order to obtain the most optimal elicitation strategy to increase the production of bioactive compounds. Among the various types of abiotic elicitors mentioned above, MJ was the most suitable type of abiotic elicitor for most adventitious root culture of medicinal plants such as
Besides MJ, SA also showed good efficacy in increasing secondary metabolite accumulation in adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. SA could increase the production of Aloe-emodin by 10-fold and chrysophanol by 13-fold in
In addition to MJ and SA, compounds containing heavy metals such as CuSO4 and AgNO4 also showed good ability as an abiotic elicitor for adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. Heavy metals can induce changes in plant metabolic processes and affect the production of proteins, sugars, photosynthetic pigments, and secondary metabolites (Thakur et al. 2019). It has been reported that CuSO4 could increase kaempferol production in adventitious root culture of
Ethephon, Caffeic acid, and Oxalic acid are also abiotic elicitors which can be considered to be applied in order to increase bioactive compounds from adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. Although its efficacy was still below MJ and SA, these compounds could still increase the accumulation of secondary metabolites (Lee et al. 2013; Bicer et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2017b). In addition, to produce optimal effects, a combination of several abiotic elicitors can be considered. For example, a combination of MJ and caffeic acid could increase the production of antraquinones in 2-fold adventitious root culture of
Biotic elicitors are elicitors that come from living organisms. Biotic elicitors can pair with receptors and act by activating or deactivating enzymes or ion channels (Thakur et al. 2019). Some biotic elicitors have been shown to increase the production of secondary metabolites in adventitious root culture of medicinal plants, namely yeast extract (
The effect of chitosan and pectin on the increase in secondary metabolite production has been demonstrated in the adventitious root culture of
The rapid advancement in the field of biotechnology research has facilitated the production of secondary metabolites from medicinal plants using cell, tissue, and organ cultures. To meet the increasing needs of the global market for drug compounds, it is important to produce these compounds in large quantities. In this context, adoption of a laboratory-scale production system for commercial scale production is a challenge. Researchers have applied bioreactor technology to scale up the production of bioactive compounds from plants. The bioreactor system is far more profitable compared to growing plants conventionally in nature because the entire process occurs in a bioreactor that can be controlled to produce high-quality yields in large quantities. Therefore, to successfully cultivate cell, tissue, and organ cultures of plants, as well as to produce bioactive compounds in the bioreactor, several engineering parameters such as aeration, fluid mixing, carbon dioxide evolution rate, temperature, shear sensitivity, pH, and dissolved oxygen must be considered (Fig. 2).
Scale-up production strategy for adventitious root culture production using the bioreactor. Adventitious roots induced from explants in solid medium are subcultured into liquid medium on the flask until eventually transferred into the bioreactor system from small-scale to production-scale. Some parameters such as medium properties, PGRs, and elicitation must be evaluated in to achieve optimized condition for the culture. To enhance the yield production, some engineering parameters on the bioreactor should be optimized as well such as aeration, inoculum density, culture period, fluid mixing, shear sensitivity, etc.
More specifically, bioreactor technology has been applied to produce secondary metabolites from medicinal plants. Manuhara et al. (2017) compared the biomass production of adventitious roots of
Large-scale culture using the bioreactor system was also adopted for adventitious root culture of
Scale-up cultivation of
Several years ago, a study on bioreactor application in medicinal plants was also performed for adventitious root culture of
Other medicinal plant species for which bioreactor technology was studied are listed in Table 1. These works on scale up production systems using bioreactors for adventitious root cultures of medicinal plants can pave the way for future advancement of biotechnological industries. These can fulfill the increasing requirement for natural drug raw materials, particularly in the pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries.
Implementation of adventitious root cultures in basic and applied research of numerous medicinal plant species has been increasing rapidly. This is because application of biotechnology, particularly in vitro culture techniques for mass propagation of medicinal plant species and for the production of secondary metabolites has become industrially worthwhile.
Successful propagation of adventitious root cultures for the fabrication of medicinally useful secondary metabolites demands the selection of a suitable bioreactor. Preference specifications are determined according to a number of elements intrinsic to certain plant cell or tissue cultures and are affected by the ultimate objectives of the study. Due to the particular characteristics of plant adventitious root cultures, bioreactor systems may remarkably differ from those applied for culturing animal cells or microorganisms. Further, the distinction between one adventitious root culture to another can be massive; it is thus clear that the optimal bioreactor systems for plant adventitious root cultures differ based on the properties of the plant species. For the mass production of valuable secondary metabolites, the process needs to be optimized and scaled up to an economically justifiable size, which is normally done by increasing the size of the bioreactor or by parallelizing the bioreactor. Furthermore, the effective use of artificial neural networks (ANN) based on prior approximations of culture conditions can improve the entire production process of secondary metabolite synthesis through adventitious root culture (Prakash et al. 2010). Eventually, several strategies such as integrated bioreactor technology, metabolic and bioreactor engineering, genetic transformation, two-phase and two-stage culture systems, and precursor feeding can be further applied to enhance the synthesis of medicinal secondary metabolites (Baque et al. 2012).
In future developments in plant-derived secondary metabolite production, the combination of mining, accessing, and conservation of plant genetic resources and optimization strategies in the production process itself could be the prime concerns. The availability of more cost-efficient, high throughput “omics” technologies (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metagenomics), along with bioinformatics, has provided new opportunities and tools to obtain deeper insights into the mechanisms and interactions of pivotal genes for the synthesis of secondary metabolites of interest. Application of “omics” to plant tissue culture will certainly help to unravel complex developmental processes such as organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis, which will probably enable to improve the efficiency of regeneration protocols for recalcitrant species. Additionally, metabolomics applied to tissue culture will facilitate the extraction and characterization of complex mixtures of natural plant products of industrial interest. These technologies have been applied for adventitious root culture of
The rapid advancement in biotechnology has rendered adventitious root cultures as one of the main choices for secondary metabolite production from medicinal plants. Many studies have been conducted to produce active compounds from medicinal plants using adventitious root culture techniques. Different improvements and process optimizations have been examined to enhance the secondary metabolites production in adventitious root cultures. However, both physical and chemical optimization is essential to produce abundant and high-quality yields. These optimization processes include proper culture conditions, the suitability of the type of media used, elicitation, and other influential parameters. In addition, scale-up production using bioreactors is also important to meet the market demands for natural drugs to cure various diseases. However, the scale-up process still needs to be optimized before it is applied for industrial production.
This work was supported by Development of Foundational Techniques for the Domestic Production of Herbal Medicines (K18405), Applicational Development of Standardized Herbal Resources (KSN1911420), Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine through the Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea.
J Plant Biotechnol 2019; 46(3): 143-157
Published online September 30, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2019.46.3.143
Copyright © The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology.
Endang Rahmat· Youngmin Kang
University of Science & Technology (UST), Campus of Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Korean Convergence Medicine major, Daejeon 34054, Republic of Korea
Herbal Medicine Resources Research Center, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, 111 Geonjae-ro, Naju-si, Jeollanam-do, 58245, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to:e-mail: ymkang@kiom.re.kr
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Medicinal plants are high-value natural resources that have been used as precautionary drugs by many people globally. The increasing global demand for bioactive compounds from medicinal plants has led to the overexploitation of many valuable species. One widely used approach to overcome this problem is the use of adventitious root cultures as a propagation strategy. This review examines the scientific research published globally on the application of adventitious root cultures for many medicinal plants. Adventitious roots generated under aseptic environments in suitable phytohormone-augmented medium exhibit high growth rates and production of important secondary metabolites. Parameters such as medium properties and composition, growth hormone type, and elicitation strategies for in vitro grown adventitious roots of medicinal plants, are the main topics discussed in this review. We also examine current developments in bioreactor system cultivation for plant bioactive compounds using adventitious root cultures, a technology with possible commercial applications, via several studies on adventitious root culture of medicinal plants in which bioreactor systems play a role. In conclusion, the development of adventitious root cultures for medicinal plants is highly useful because of their capability for vegetative propagation and germplasm preservation.
Keywords: Adventitious root culture, bioreactor, medicinal plants, secondary metabolites
PGRs : Plant Growth Hormones
MJ : Methil Jasmonate
SA : Salisilic Acid
BTBB : Baloon-Type Bubble Bioreactor
BCB : Bubble Column Bioreactor
TIS : Temporary Immersion System
IAA : Indole-3-Acetic Acid
IBA : Indole-3-Butyric Acid
NAA : 1-Naphthaleneacetic Acid
NOA : Naphthoxyacetic acid
2,4-D : 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
PAA : Phenylacetic Acid
Medicinal plants are widely used globally as sources of raw materials in the pharmaceutical industry. Highly important bioactive compounds called plant secondary metabolites are intensively harvested from medicinal plants to improve human health and standard of life. The World Health Organization (WHO) has announced that approximately 80% of humans worldwide utilize medicinal plant materials for primary health therapy (Raskin et al. 2002). However, human activities affect natural conservation and cause much damage. The development of modern cities, severe air pollution generated by vehicles, reduction of productive land because of housing developments, and substantial exploitation of natural resources have increased the difficulties in medicinal herb cultivation. In other words, the medicinal activity and efficacy of bioactive compounds derived from medicinal plants could be weakened by environmental disturbances and physiological damage, particularly by factors preventing their stable production (Beppu et al. 2004). In addition, current medicinal plants that are grown naturally, differ from their previous state because of increased contamination with pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, and heavy metals from industrial waste. This contamination is harmful to human health and reduces the quality of the herbs. Thus, the natural production of medicinal plants cannot meet increasing market needs. Furthermore, because of the intricate structure and configuration of plant secondary metabolites, artificial chemical synthesis has generally been found to be unsuitable in terms of cost. Therefore, obtaining sufficient medicinal herbal ingredients in the right manner has become a high-priority endeavor for the advancement of the global pharmaceutical industry (Gaosheng and Jingming 2012).
The primary metabolism of plants plays the important role of the synthesis of biologically active compounds called secondary metabolites. These products are not extensively involved in plant growth and development but are needed for specific functions such as conferring protection against environmental anomalies and stresses, as well as in plant defense against pathogens and herbivores. Owing to their ability and efficacy against pathogens, secondary metabolites are widely used as pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, these bioactive compounds are also utilized as food additives and agrochemical aromatics, emphasizing their importance for human life (Oksman-Caldentey et al 2004). There are three major groups of secondary metabolites: alkaloids (nitrogen and sulfur containing compounds), terpenoids, and phenolics. Normally, secondary metabolite production relies considerably on the developmental process and the physiological state of the plant, and yields are often very low (less than 1% in dry weight) (Rao et al., 2002; Thakur et al., 2013). Therefore, the development of alternative and highly creative strategies for overall plant cultivation is a very important social and economic challenge, especially for the high-output production of biologically essential bioactive compounds. For this reason, biotechnological approaches in plant cell, tissue, and organ culture have intensively been studied over the past several decades, as a prospective technology for the cultivation and production of pharmacologically beneficial plant bioactive compounds (Rao and Ravishankar 2002).
One approach that has been widely used for medicinal plant cultivation and production of highly valued compounds is micropropagation using in vitro culture. In 1934, White proposed the theory of totipotency for the first time. Then, in 1952~1953, Steward verified the theory using carrot cells cultivated in aseptic liquid media to induce and obtain the whole plant. Thereafter, cell, tissue, and organ culture has evolved as a highly prospective technology for the cultivation and production of useful secondary metabolites derived from plants. In particular, their rapid ability to sprout and special capability for producing many secondary plant metabolites has led to the wide use of organ culture techniques such as adventitious root culture for medicinal plants (Murthy et al. 2008). Adventitious root cultures show a higher constancy in the production of highly active compounds with more rapid growth than that of cell culture (Sivakumar, 2006). In addition, bioreactor system cultivation for plant bioactive compounds using adventitious root cultures has emerged as a technology with possible commercial applications (Paek et al. 2009).
In the following highlight, the development of adventitious root culture techniques is presented and the current progress and innovation in secondary metabolites production from medicinal plants using different treatments of adventitious root cultures is reviewed and discussed.
Plant roots have been demonstrated to be a plentiful resource of highly valued secondary metabolites that can be advantageous to human health (Bais et al. 2001). Adventitious roots are plant roots that arise from any organ other than the root itself, and form either during normal development or in response to environmental stresses, such as wounding, flooding, and mineral deficiency. They grow both underground and aerially and generally develop from leaves, stem nodes, and internodes. Adventitious roots serve many important roles for the plant and help the plant to survive even in environmentally adverse conditions.
Adventitious root formation has a complex molecular process involving numerous endogenous and exogenous physiological factors (Sorin et al. 2005). According to Zhang et al. (2017a), the formation stages of adventitious root can be divided into four steps: the root pre-emergence phase that includes molecular and biochemical process alterations occurring before any cytological occurrence until the emergence of primordial roots, the early phase of root development, the massive root growth phase, and the final phase of root configuration (Fig. 1). The process of induction and differentiation in the physiological stages of rooting can be triggered by changes in endogenous auxin concentrations and external addition of specific auxins (Praveen et al. 2009).
Developmental phases on the organogenesis of adventitious root formation. There are four steps of adventitious root formation and proliferation. First is the root pre-emergence stage which includes dedifferentiation (induction), formation of root initials (initiation), development of an organized root primordia, and emergence of root primordia (elongation). In this first process, some PGRs such as auxin, cytokinin, ABA, and ethylene play a critical role in the adventitious root formation. The subsequent process is the early phase of root formation, massive root growth, and final phase of root development
During the adventitious root formation, there are many changes in the endogenous subtances level. This is mainly related to the regulation of hormone levels which might play a role in it. In this case, auxin and ethylene primarily act as activators, while cytokinin and ethylene play more roles as inhibitors (Pop et al. 2011). These hormones can help or inhibit the adventitious root formation process based on their concentration. For example, in the elongation process during the root pre-emergence phase (Fig. 1), too high auxin concentration actually inhibits the elongation process. Meanwhile, ethylene can be a counterweight that can trigger an elongation process. This occurs because the relationship between auxin and ethylene is one of the factors that can promote the formation of adventitious root (Pan et al. 2002). Gene expression for adventitious root induction in plants is fundamentally affected by a complex of microRNAs that have a significant regulatory role in controlling auxin response factors. Hormonal controls take place after new root establishment using auxins at low concentrations. A small amount of auxin is still needed for preserving and supporting root meristem, and cytokinins are required to trigger the differentiation of root tissue.
Actually, the mechanism of the adventitious root formation process is a very complicated process. Although the role of auxin in the formation of adventitious root is well known, some of the molecular processes that occur (particularly adventitious root formation-genes) are still unknown, therefore this mechanism represents an open for research area.
Adventitious root formation is one of the key steps of in vitro propagation and is used for the cultivation and production of many plant crops, including medicinal plants. Recent advances in propagation techniques have resulted in the production of high amounts of biologically active compounds, such as phenols, terpenoids, and alkaloids using plant cell, tissue, as well as organs cultures (Gantet et al. 1998). Due to their rapid growth and stable metabolite productivity, adventitious root cultures are considered the most promising method for biomass production (Carvalho and Curtis 1998). Root cultures frequently show better biosynthetic ability than plant cell suspension cultures, which have low yields of secondary metabolites (Kevers et al. 1999). For instance, adventitious roots of important medicinal plants raised by micropropagation display increased biomass proliferation, accumulation potential, and bioactive compounds production. Hence, in vitro culture of adventitious roots has the potential to be developed as a strategy for large-scale bioactive compound production. Moreover, plant roots are the main raw materials that contribute to herbal drug preparations, accounting for about 60% of herbal medicinal plants applied for ethno-medicine needs. Therefore, adventitious root culture establishment is highly useful because of its capability for micropropagation and germplasm preservation (Sudha and Seeni 2001).
Adventitious roots show better growth rates and constant production of secondary metabolites when induced under an aseptic artificial environment in the optimal phytohormone-augmented medium (Hahn et al. 2003). These roots generate high amounts of alkaloids, terpenoids, and phenols in their cell and tissue spaces and show high stability and growth rates, which can be easily produced in a suitable hormone-supplemented medium with a low quantity of inoculum (Sivakumar et al. 2006).
In some plant species, hairy root culture techniques using
Adventitious root cultures can be induced from field grown explants, in vitro grown explants, or from calluses. The types and combination of Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs) used play important roles in adventitious root culture formation. Lately, combinations of handling in cultivation processes such as elicitor supplementation, medium condition optimization, adjustment of precursor feeding, and bioreactor application are being studied for the generation of high-yield secondary metabolites. The development of adventitious root cultures by applying machine-driven bioreactor technology for all kinds of pharmacologically beneficial plants is important for the cultivation and production in huge quantities of plant-derived biologically active compounds to be used in various types of human healthcare and cosmetic products.
A list of pharmacologically valuable medicinal herbs where adventitious roots have been developed using various treatments and improvements for efficient and effective production of highly useful bioactive compounds has been compiled in Table 1.
Table 1 . List of medicinal plant species wherein adventitious roots have been developed through the exposure of various treatments and optimization strategies.
No. | Plant Species | Secondary Metabolites | Optimized Conditions (Media & PGRs) | Applied Bioreactor Types | Bioreactor Optimization Strategies | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Aloe-emodin & Chrysophanol | B5 +0.5 mg/L NAA+ 0.2 mg/L BA | - | - | Lee et al. 2011; 2013 | |
2 | Andrographolide | MS+ 2.7 µM NAA | - | - | Praveen et al. 2009 | |
3 | Pinostrobin | MS+0.5 mg/L NAA | - | - | Azhar et al. 2018; Yusuf et al. 2018 | |
4 | Catechin & Caffeine | ½ MS | - | - | Kim et al. 2013 | |
5 | Asiaticoside | MS+7 mg/L IBA | - | - | Ling et al. 2009 | |
6 | Stigmasterol & Hecogenin | MS+3 mg/L IBA | - | - | Bathoju and Giri 2012 | |
7 | Resinoid | MS+0.5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Nagarajan et al. 2011 | |
8 | Eugenol & Farnesol | ½ MS+2 mg/L IBA | - | - | Manokari and Shekhawa 2016 | |
9 | Flavonoid | ½ MS+2 mg/L IBA | - | - | Wu et al. 2006 | |
10 | Caffeic acid derivates | ½ MS+1 mg/L IBA | BTBB | •Media replenishment: 0.5 MS | Wu et al. 2007 | |
•Aeration rate: 0.1 vvm | ||||||
11 | Quassinoid | MS+3 mg/L NAA | - | - | Hussein et al. 2012 | |
12 | Apigenin, Gallic acid, Rutin | MS+1 mg/L NAA | - | - | Khan et al. 2017 | |
13 | Kaempfrerol & Myricetin | MS+3 mg/L NAA+1 mg/L IBA | BTBB & TIS Bioreactor | A. BTBB | Faizah et al. 2018 | |
•Aeration rate: 0.2 vvm | ||||||
B. TIS Bioreactor | ||||||
•Immersion frequency: 15 min each 12 h | ||||||
•Sucrose concentration: 5% | ||||||
14 | Hypericin, Quercetin, Hyperoside | MS+1 mg/L IBA | BTBB | •Inoculum density: 6 g/L FW | Cui et al. 2010 | |
•Sucrose concentration: 3% | ||||||
•Aeration volume: 0.1 vvm | ||||||
15 | Flavonoids & Phenolics | MS+5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Hasan et al. 2014 | |
16 | Luffin | MS+1 mg/L IBA+1 mg/L NAA | - | - | Umamaheswari et al. 2014 | |
17 | 2-hydroxy-4-methoxy benzaldehyde | MS+2.5 µM IAA | - | - | Baskaran et al. 2016 | |
18 | Antrhaquinones, Phenolic, Flavonoid | MS+5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Baque et al. 2012 | |
19 | Rosmarinic acid | MS+3 mg/L IAA | - | - | Ling et al. 2009 | |
20 | Ginsenoside | MS+25 µM IBA | BTBB | •Co-culture system | Wu et al. 2008 | |
•Co-culture Inoculum ratio 4:1 | ||||||
21 | Ginsenoside | MS+3 mg/L IBA+1 mg/L NAA | - | - | Wang et al. 2016 | |
22 | Tanshinone | MS+2 mg/L NAA | - | - | Zaker et al. 2015 | |
23 | Podophyllotoxin | MS+1.5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Rajesh et al. 2012 | |
24 | Antrhaquinones, Phenolic, Flavonoid | MS+9.4 µM IBA | BTBB | •Culture period: 4 weeks | Ho et al. 2017, 2018 | |
25 | Prunellin | MS+0.5 mg/L NAA | - | - | Fazal et al. 2014 | |
26 | Triterpenoid Saponin | B5+0.05 mg/L IBA+0.1 mg/L NAA | - | - | Zhang et al. 2017b | |
27 | Psoralen | MS+3 µM IBA | - | - | Baskaran and Jayabalan N 2009 | |
28 | Anthocyanin | MS+0.5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Betsui et al. 2004 | |
39 | Antrhaquinones, Phenolic | MS | - | - | Bicer et al. 2017 | |
30 | Antrhaquinones, Flavonoids | MS+5 µM NAA | - | - | Mahdieh et al. 2015 | |
31 | Scopolamine | B5+0.1 mg/L IBA | Bubble Column Bioreactor | •Inoculum density: 3 g/L | Kang et al. 2004; Jung et al. 2003; Min et al. 2007 | |
•Aeration rates: 0.4 vvm | ||||||
•Culture period: 3 weeks | ||||||
32 | Silymarin | MS+2 mg/L IBA | - | - | Riasat et al. 2015 | |
33 | Saponin | MS+2 mg/L IBA | BTBB | NaHCO3 supplementation | Solim et al. 2017 | |
34 | sesquiterpene lactones | ½ MS+2 mg/L IBA | - | - | Khalafalla et al. 2009 | |
35 | Whitanolide | ½ MS+ 0.5 mg/L IBA+0.25 mg/L IAA | - | - | Thilip et al. 2015 |
Optimal growth and morphogenesis of tissues may vary among different plants according to their nutritional requirements. For this reason, there are many factors influencing the optimal conditions for adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. These factors include the type and strength of the media used, the category, concentration, and characteristics of carbon source supplied, pH adjustment, and inoculum density. Various culture media are widely used for secondary metabolite studies to optimize nutritional requirements for the induction and proliferation of plant cells, tissues, and organs (Park et al. 2004). Diverse categories of media have significantly different effects on the growth and development of in vitro grown adventitious roots. Furthermore, various media properties such as media type, media salt strength, sucrose composition, and pH have been applied and broadly studied in terms of organ cultures, particularly in the adventitious root cultivation of herbal plants.
Different types of culture media have various effects on induction and proliferation of adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. It has been reported, MS media was very suitable for the induction and proliferation of the adventitious root culture of
In addition to choice of media used, the concentration of carbon sources needed for adventitious roots formation also varies for each species of medicinal plants. This happens because the ability of each plant species to absorb and process carbon source metabolism varies between one another. For example, 50 g/L sucrose concentration was very suitable for adventitious root culture of
A study on the effect of sucrose concentrations for optimizing the adventitious root culture of medicinal plants was also undertaken for
The formation of adventitious roots mainly depends on anatomical status. Induction and differentiation pathways in the rooting process can be stimulated by artificially providing certain auxin hormones (Praveen et al. 2009). In addition, physiological stages of rooting can be affected by changes in endogenous auxin concentrations (Fig. 1). Auxin is a plant hormone that has several functions in different cellular processes, especially in controlling the growth, development and proliferation of a plant cell. This hormone comes from the amino acid tryptophan. The most widely distributed auxin and has been widely used, namely indoleacetic acid (IAA) and indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). After successfully studied the original structure of auxin, the scientist then succeeded in making artificial auxin called synthetic growth regulators. Two types of auxin synthetic which play a role in the rooting process, for example 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D).
Many studies have also shown that the efficacy of diverse auxins for the establishment and propagation of in vitro grown adventitious roots varies by the family and species of the plant (Baskaran and Jayabalan 2009). In addition, the type of auxin also greatly influences the process of induction and proliferation of the adventitious root culture. Based on various reports presented in table 1, IBA is the most suitable auxin for induction and development of adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. IBA, compared to other types of auxin, is a hormone that is very suitable for the adventitious root culture of
Besides IBA, NAA also has a significant influence on induction and proliferation of adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. It has been reported that NAA is the best auxin hormone for establishment of adventurous root culture of
Compared to IBA and NAA, the naturally occurring auxin hormone IAA apparently has the lowest efficacy in promoting adventitious root culture of medicinal plant. IAA only superior when its applied for the establishment of adventititous root culture of
Stress levels are an important factor for the growth and development of medicinal plants, especially for secondary metabolite accumulation and therapeutic activity. Plant stress responses can be actively stimulated using elicitation techniques to generate the desired metabolic process response in the biosynthetic pathway. Stress factors that raise or enhance the biosynthesis of a specific secondary metabolite compound when applied in small quantities are called elicitors. The specific compounds influenced by elicitors have a significant role in the adaptation of plants to environmental pressure. Elicitation is considered the most practical and feasible strategy among several biotechnological approaches that have been studied and employed for productivity improvement of appealing biologically active compounds from cells, organs, and whole plant components. In general, there are two groups of elicitors, namely, biotic and abiotic elicitors. Biotic elicitors are substances of biological origin such as fungi, bacteria, yeast, and polysaccharides derived from the plant cell walls (e.g., cellulose, pectin, and chitin). However, abiotic elicitors include substances of non-biological origin and are grouped as hormonal, physical, and chemical factors. The explanations below summarize the studies of in vitro grown adventitious roots of medicinal plants in which elicitation strategies played a role (Table 2).
Table 2 . List of medicinal plant species wherein elicitation strategies have been applied into adventitious root cultures.
No. | Species | Secondary Metabolites | Applied Elicitors | Highest Increment of Metabolite Yield | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Aloe-emodin & Chrysophanol | SA, MJ, Ethephon | •Aloe-emodin Increased approximately 10-fold by SA | Lee et al. 2013 | |
•Chrysophanol increased 5-13 fold by SA | |||||
2 | Apigenin, Rutin | MJ & PAA | •Apigenin increased 1.6-fold by MJ | Khan et al. 2017 | |
•Gallic acid increased 5.3-fold by MJ | |||||
3 | Kaempfrerol & Quercetin | Saccharomiyces sereviciae, CuSO4 | •Kaempferol increased 13.3-fold by CuSO4 | Faizah et al. 2018 | |
•Querectin increased 1.9-fold by | |||||
4 | Phenols | MJ, SA, Lactabumin hydrolysate | •Total Phenolic compounds increased 1.2-fold by MJ | Cui et al. 2010 | |
5 | Antrhaquinones, Phenolic, Flavonoid | Chitosan & Pectin | •Antrhaquinones increased 1.4-fold by chitosan | Baque et al. 2012 | |
•Phenolic increased 1.08-fold by chitosan | |||||
•Flavonoid increased 1.12-fold by chitosan | |||||
6 | Ginsenoside | MJ | •Ginsenoside increased 8-fold | Wu et al. 2008 | |
7 | Ginsenoside | MJ | •Ginsenoside increased 5.24-fold | Wang et al. 2016 | |
8 | Tanshinone | MJ,AgNO3, Sorbitol, Yeast Extract | •Cryptotanshinone increased 3.63-fold by Yeast Extract | Zaker et al. 2015 | |
•Tanshinone IIA increased 1.91-fold by AgNO3 | |||||
9 | Phenolic | MJ, SA, Yeast Extract, Chitosan | •Total phenolic increased 1.42-fold by MJ | Ho et al. 2018 | |
10 | Triterpenoid Saponin | Oxalic acid | •Total saponin increased 1.65 fold | Zhang et al. 2017b | |
11 | Antrhaquinones | MJ & Caffeic acid | •Total Antrhaquinones increased 2-fold by combination of MJ & Caffeic acid | Bicer et al. 2017 | |
12 | Scopolamine | MJ, SA, Bacteria | •Scopolamine increased approximately 1.4-fold by MJ | Kang et al. 2004; Jung et al. 2003 | |
•Hyosiamine increased approximately 2.2-fold by MJ |
Some abiotic elicitors such as MJ, SA, CuSO4, AgNO3, sorbitol, caffeic acid, oxalic acid, phenyl acetic acid (PAA), and ethephon have been applied to improve the biosynthesis and accumulation of secondary metabolites produced by adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. Almost all the studies that have been carried out, aim to compare the various types and concentrations of elicitor in order to obtain the most optimal elicitation strategy to increase the production of bioactive compounds. Among the various types of abiotic elicitors mentioned above, MJ was the most suitable type of abiotic elicitor for most adventitious root culture of medicinal plants such as
Besides MJ, SA also showed good efficacy in increasing secondary metabolite accumulation in adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. SA could increase the production of Aloe-emodin by 10-fold and chrysophanol by 13-fold in
In addition to MJ and SA, compounds containing heavy metals such as CuSO4 and AgNO4 also showed good ability as an abiotic elicitor for adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. Heavy metals can induce changes in plant metabolic processes and affect the production of proteins, sugars, photosynthetic pigments, and secondary metabolites (Thakur et al. 2019). It has been reported that CuSO4 could increase kaempferol production in adventitious root culture of
Ethephon, Caffeic acid, and Oxalic acid are also abiotic elicitors which can be considered to be applied in order to increase bioactive compounds from adventitious root culture of medicinal plants. Although its efficacy was still below MJ and SA, these compounds could still increase the accumulation of secondary metabolites (Lee et al. 2013; Bicer et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2017b). In addition, to produce optimal effects, a combination of several abiotic elicitors can be considered. For example, a combination of MJ and caffeic acid could increase the production of antraquinones in 2-fold adventitious root culture of
Biotic elicitors are elicitors that come from living organisms. Biotic elicitors can pair with receptors and act by activating or deactivating enzymes or ion channels (Thakur et al. 2019). Some biotic elicitors have been shown to increase the production of secondary metabolites in adventitious root culture of medicinal plants, namely yeast extract (
The effect of chitosan and pectin on the increase in secondary metabolite production has been demonstrated in the adventitious root culture of
The rapid advancement in the field of biotechnology research has facilitated the production of secondary metabolites from medicinal plants using cell, tissue, and organ cultures. To meet the increasing needs of the global market for drug compounds, it is important to produce these compounds in large quantities. In this context, adoption of a laboratory-scale production system for commercial scale production is a challenge. Researchers have applied bioreactor technology to scale up the production of bioactive compounds from plants. The bioreactor system is far more profitable compared to growing plants conventionally in nature because the entire process occurs in a bioreactor that can be controlled to produce high-quality yields in large quantities. Therefore, to successfully cultivate cell, tissue, and organ cultures of plants, as well as to produce bioactive compounds in the bioreactor, several engineering parameters such as aeration, fluid mixing, carbon dioxide evolution rate, temperature, shear sensitivity, pH, and dissolved oxygen must be considered (Fig. 2).
Scale-up production strategy for adventitious root culture production using the bioreactor. Adventitious roots induced from explants in solid medium are subcultured into liquid medium on the flask until eventually transferred into the bioreactor system from small-scale to production-scale. Some parameters such as medium properties, PGRs, and elicitation must be evaluated in to achieve optimized condition for the culture. To enhance the yield production, some engineering parameters on the bioreactor should be optimized as well such as aeration, inoculum density, culture period, fluid mixing, shear sensitivity, etc.
More specifically, bioreactor technology has been applied to produce secondary metabolites from medicinal plants. Manuhara et al. (2017) compared the biomass production of adventitious roots of
Large-scale culture using the bioreactor system was also adopted for adventitious root culture of
Scale-up cultivation of
Several years ago, a study on bioreactor application in medicinal plants was also performed for adventitious root culture of
Other medicinal plant species for which bioreactor technology was studied are listed in Table 1. These works on scale up production systems using bioreactors for adventitious root cultures of medicinal plants can pave the way for future advancement of biotechnological industries. These can fulfill the increasing requirement for natural drug raw materials, particularly in the pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries.
Implementation of adventitious root cultures in basic and applied research of numerous medicinal plant species has been increasing rapidly. This is because application of biotechnology, particularly in vitro culture techniques for mass propagation of medicinal plant species and for the production of secondary metabolites has become industrially worthwhile.
Successful propagation of adventitious root cultures for the fabrication of medicinally useful secondary metabolites demands the selection of a suitable bioreactor. Preference specifications are determined according to a number of elements intrinsic to certain plant cell or tissue cultures and are affected by the ultimate objectives of the study. Due to the particular characteristics of plant adventitious root cultures, bioreactor systems may remarkably differ from those applied for culturing animal cells or microorganisms. Further, the distinction between one adventitious root culture to another can be massive; it is thus clear that the optimal bioreactor systems for plant adventitious root cultures differ based on the properties of the plant species. For the mass production of valuable secondary metabolites, the process needs to be optimized and scaled up to an economically justifiable size, which is normally done by increasing the size of the bioreactor or by parallelizing the bioreactor. Furthermore, the effective use of artificial neural networks (ANN) based on prior approximations of culture conditions can improve the entire production process of secondary metabolite synthesis through adventitious root culture (Prakash et al. 2010). Eventually, several strategies such as integrated bioreactor technology, metabolic and bioreactor engineering, genetic transformation, two-phase and two-stage culture systems, and precursor feeding can be further applied to enhance the synthesis of medicinal secondary metabolites (Baque et al. 2012).
In future developments in plant-derived secondary metabolite production, the combination of mining, accessing, and conservation of plant genetic resources and optimization strategies in the production process itself could be the prime concerns. The availability of more cost-efficient, high throughput “omics” technologies (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metagenomics), along with bioinformatics, has provided new opportunities and tools to obtain deeper insights into the mechanisms and interactions of pivotal genes for the synthesis of secondary metabolites of interest. Application of “omics” to plant tissue culture will certainly help to unravel complex developmental processes such as organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis, which will probably enable to improve the efficiency of regeneration protocols for recalcitrant species. Additionally, metabolomics applied to tissue culture will facilitate the extraction and characterization of complex mixtures of natural plant products of industrial interest. These technologies have been applied for adventitious root culture of
The rapid advancement in biotechnology has rendered adventitious root cultures as one of the main choices for secondary metabolite production from medicinal plants. Many studies have been conducted to produce active compounds from medicinal plants using adventitious root culture techniques. Different improvements and process optimizations have been examined to enhance the secondary metabolites production in adventitious root cultures. However, both physical and chemical optimization is essential to produce abundant and high-quality yields. These optimization processes include proper culture conditions, the suitability of the type of media used, elicitation, and other influential parameters. In addition, scale-up production using bioreactors is also important to meet the market demands for natural drugs to cure various diseases. However, the scale-up process still needs to be optimized before it is applied for industrial production.
This work was supported by Development of Foundational Techniques for the Domestic Production of Herbal Medicines (K18405), Applicational Development of Standardized Herbal Resources (KSN1911420), Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine through the Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea.
Developmental phases on the organogenesis of adventitious root formation. There are four steps of adventitious root formation and proliferation. First is the root pre-emergence stage which includes dedifferentiation (induction), formation of root initials (initiation), development of an organized root primordia, and emergence of root primordia (elongation). In this first process, some PGRs such as auxin, cytokinin, ABA, and ethylene play a critical role in the adventitious root formation. The subsequent process is the early phase of root formation, massive root growth, and final phase of root development
Scale-up production strategy for adventitious root culture production using the bioreactor. Adventitious roots induced from explants in solid medium are subcultured into liquid medium on the flask until eventually transferred into the bioreactor system from small-scale to production-scale. Some parameters such as medium properties, PGRs, and elicitation must be evaluated in to achieve optimized condition for the culture. To enhance the yield production, some engineering parameters on the bioreactor should be optimized as well such as aeration, inoculum density, culture period, fluid mixing, shear sensitivity, etc.
Table 1 . List of medicinal plant species wherein adventitious roots have been developed through the exposure of various treatments and optimization strategies.
No. | Plant Species | Secondary Metabolites | Optimized Conditions (Media & PGRs) | Applied Bioreactor Types | Bioreactor Optimization Strategies | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Aloe-emodin & Chrysophanol | B5 +0.5 mg/L NAA+ 0.2 mg/L BA | - | - | Lee et al. 2011; 2013 | |
2 | Andrographolide | MS+ 2.7 µM NAA | - | - | Praveen et al. 2009 | |
3 | Pinostrobin | MS+0.5 mg/L NAA | - | - | Azhar et al. 2018; Yusuf et al. 2018 | |
4 | Catechin & Caffeine | ½ MS | - | - | Kim et al. 2013 | |
5 | Asiaticoside | MS+7 mg/L IBA | - | - | Ling et al. 2009 | |
6 | Stigmasterol & Hecogenin | MS+3 mg/L IBA | - | - | Bathoju and Giri 2012 | |
7 | Resinoid | MS+0.5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Nagarajan et al. 2011 | |
8 | Eugenol & Farnesol | ½ MS+2 mg/L IBA | - | - | Manokari and Shekhawa 2016 | |
9 | Flavonoid | ½ MS+2 mg/L IBA | - | - | Wu et al. 2006 | |
10 | Caffeic acid derivates | ½ MS+1 mg/L IBA | BTBB | •Media replenishment: 0.5 MS | Wu et al. 2007 | |
•Aeration rate: 0.1 vvm | ||||||
11 | Quassinoid | MS+3 mg/L NAA | - | - | Hussein et al. 2012 | |
12 | Apigenin, Gallic acid, Rutin | MS+1 mg/L NAA | - | - | Khan et al. 2017 | |
13 | Kaempfrerol & Myricetin | MS+3 mg/L NAA+1 mg/L IBA | BTBB & TIS Bioreactor | A. BTBB | Faizah et al. 2018 | |
•Aeration rate: 0.2 vvm | ||||||
B. TIS Bioreactor | ||||||
•Immersion frequency: 15 min each 12 h | ||||||
•Sucrose concentration: 5% | ||||||
14 | Hypericin, Quercetin, Hyperoside | MS+1 mg/L IBA | BTBB | •Inoculum density: 6 g/L FW | Cui et al. 2010 | |
•Sucrose concentration: 3% | ||||||
•Aeration volume: 0.1 vvm | ||||||
15 | Flavonoids & Phenolics | MS+5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Hasan et al. 2014 | |
16 | Luffin | MS+1 mg/L IBA+1 mg/L NAA | - | - | Umamaheswari et al. 2014 | |
17 | 2-hydroxy-4-methoxy benzaldehyde | MS+2.5 µM IAA | - | - | Baskaran et al. 2016 | |
18 | Antrhaquinones, Phenolic, Flavonoid | MS+5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Baque et al. 2012 | |
19 | Rosmarinic acid | MS+3 mg/L IAA | - | - | Ling et al. 2009 | |
20 | Ginsenoside | MS+25 µM IBA | BTBB | •Co-culture system | Wu et al. 2008 | |
•Co-culture Inoculum ratio 4:1 | ||||||
21 | Ginsenoside | MS+3 mg/L IBA+1 mg/L NAA | - | - | Wang et al. 2016 | |
22 | Tanshinone | MS+2 mg/L NAA | - | - | Zaker et al. 2015 | |
23 | Podophyllotoxin | MS+1.5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Rajesh et al. 2012 | |
24 | Antrhaquinones, Phenolic, Flavonoid | MS+9.4 µM IBA | BTBB | •Culture period: 4 weeks | Ho et al. 2017, 2018 | |
25 | Prunellin | MS+0.5 mg/L NAA | - | - | Fazal et al. 2014 | |
26 | Triterpenoid Saponin | B5+0.05 mg/L IBA+0.1 mg/L NAA | - | - | Zhang et al. 2017b | |
27 | Psoralen | MS+3 µM IBA | - | - | Baskaran and Jayabalan N 2009 | |
28 | Anthocyanin | MS+0.5 mg/L IBA | - | - | Betsui et al. 2004 | |
39 | Antrhaquinones, Phenolic | MS | - | - | Bicer et al. 2017 | |
30 | Antrhaquinones, Flavonoids | MS+5 µM NAA | - | - | Mahdieh et al. 2015 | |
31 | Scopolamine | B5+0.1 mg/L IBA | Bubble Column Bioreactor | •Inoculum density: 3 g/L | Kang et al. 2004; Jung et al. 2003; Min et al. 2007 | |
•Aeration rates: 0.4 vvm | ||||||
•Culture period: 3 weeks | ||||||
32 | Silymarin | MS+2 mg/L IBA | - | - | Riasat et al. 2015 | |
33 | Saponin | MS+2 mg/L IBA | BTBB | NaHCO3 supplementation | Solim et al. 2017 | |
34 | sesquiterpene lactones | ½ MS+2 mg/L IBA | - | - | Khalafalla et al. 2009 | |
35 | Whitanolide | ½ MS+ 0.5 mg/L IBA+0.25 mg/L IAA | - | - | Thilip et al. 2015 |
Table 2 . List of medicinal plant species wherein elicitation strategies have been applied into adventitious root cultures.
No. | Species | Secondary Metabolites | Applied Elicitors | Highest Increment of Metabolite Yield | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Aloe-emodin & Chrysophanol | SA, MJ, Ethephon | •Aloe-emodin Increased approximately 10-fold by SA | Lee et al. 2013 | |
•Chrysophanol increased 5-13 fold by SA | |||||
2 | Apigenin, Rutin | MJ & PAA | •Apigenin increased 1.6-fold by MJ | Khan et al. 2017 | |
•Gallic acid increased 5.3-fold by MJ | |||||
3 | Kaempfrerol & Quercetin | Saccharomiyces sereviciae, CuSO4 | •Kaempferol increased 13.3-fold by CuSO4 | Faizah et al. 2018 | |
•Querectin increased 1.9-fold by | |||||
4 | Phenols | MJ, SA, Lactabumin hydrolysate | •Total Phenolic compounds increased 1.2-fold by MJ | Cui et al. 2010 | |
5 | Antrhaquinones, Phenolic, Flavonoid | Chitosan & Pectin | •Antrhaquinones increased 1.4-fold by chitosan | Baque et al. 2012 | |
•Phenolic increased 1.08-fold by chitosan | |||||
•Flavonoid increased 1.12-fold by chitosan | |||||
6 | Ginsenoside | MJ | •Ginsenoside increased 8-fold | Wu et al. 2008 | |
7 | Ginsenoside | MJ | •Ginsenoside increased 5.24-fold | Wang et al. 2016 | |
8 | Tanshinone | MJ,AgNO3, Sorbitol, Yeast Extract | •Cryptotanshinone increased 3.63-fold by Yeast Extract | Zaker et al. 2015 | |
•Tanshinone IIA increased 1.91-fold by AgNO3 | |||||
9 | Phenolic | MJ, SA, Yeast Extract, Chitosan | •Total phenolic increased 1.42-fold by MJ | Ho et al. 2018 | |
10 | Triterpenoid Saponin | Oxalic acid | •Total saponin increased 1.65 fold | Zhang et al. 2017b | |
11 | Antrhaquinones | MJ & Caffeic acid | •Total Antrhaquinones increased 2-fold by combination of MJ & Caffeic acid | Bicer et al. 2017 | |
12 | Scopolamine | MJ, SA, Bacteria | •Scopolamine increased approximately 1.4-fold by MJ | Kang et al. 2004; Jung et al. 2003 | |
•Hyosiamine increased approximately 2.2-fold by MJ |
Roggers Gang·Youngmin Kang
J Plant Biotechnol 2022; 49(1): 3-14Yun-Hee Kim, Yong-Wook Shin, and Shin-Woo Lee
J Plant Biotechnol 2018; 45(1): 9-16
Journal of
Plant BiotechnologyDevelopmental phases on the organogenesis of adventitious root formation. There are four steps of adventitious root formation and proliferation. First is the root pre-emergence stage which includes dedifferentiation (induction), formation of root initials (initiation), development of an organized root primordia, and emergence of root primordia (elongation). In this first process, some PGRs such as auxin, cytokinin, ABA, and ethylene play a critical role in the adventitious root formation. The subsequent process is the early phase of root formation, massive root growth, and final phase of root development
|@|~(^,^)~|@|Scale-up production strategy for adventitious root culture production using the bioreactor. Adventitious roots induced from explants in solid medium are subcultured into liquid medium on the flask until eventually transferred into the bioreactor system from small-scale to production-scale. Some parameters such as medium properties, PGRs, and elicitation must be evaluated in to achieve optimized condition for the culture. To enhance the yield production, some engineering parameters on the bioreactor should be optimized as well such as aeration, inoculum density, culture period, fluid mixing, shear sensitivity, etc.