Research Article

Split Viewer

J Plant Biotechnol (2024) 51:265-272

Published online October 11, 2024

https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2024.51.025.265

© The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology

Preparation of polyclonal antiserum to Tomato mosaic virus and its application as a viral diagnostic test

Boburbek Akhmadaliev · Bobir Abduvaliev · Bakhtiyor Adilov · Shakhnoza Aripova · Zarifa Kadirova · Bobur Abdikarimov · Tokhir Makhmudov · Anvar Sherimbetov · Dilshod Ruzmetov · Bahodir Eshchanov

1Unique Object Collection of Phytopathogens and Other Microorganisms, Institute of Genetics and Plant Experimental Biology, Academy of Sciences of Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, 111226, Uzbekistan
2Laboratory of Plant Immunity, Institute of Genetics and Plant Experimental Biology, Academy of Sciences of Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, 111226, Uzbekistan
3Research Institute of Vegetable, Melon Crops, and Potato, Tashkent, 111106, Uzbekistan
4National Center for Agricultural Knowledge and Innovations. Sh. Rashidov Street Building #1, A. Yassavi Community Gathering, Yuqorichirchiq district, Tashkent region, 111909, Uzbekistan

Correspondence to : B. Akhmadaliev (✉)
e-mail: ahmadaliyev_bobur@mail.ru

Received: 30 August 2024; Revised: 26 September 2024; Accepted: 26 September 2024; Published: 11 October 2024.

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

In recent years, the expansion of international seed exports of vegetable crops has led to the spread of both endemic and non-endemic strains of viruses globally. Among these, the Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) poses a significant threat to the global vegetable industry, particularly the tomato sector, resulting in substantial economic losses. Due to its high pathogenicity and rapid spread, ToMV has been detected in almost all countries, severely impacting the production of tomatoes and other vegetable crops. Creating a rapid and accurate diagnostic test for ToMV is crucial for preventing this infectious disease and developing control measures. A practical approach to mitigate ToMV’s impact involves early virus detection while the plant is asymptomatic. This study presents the results of research focused on the preparation of polyclonal antiserum, which is crucial for the immunodiagnostics of ToMV, ensuring high sensitivity and specificity. This modern approach offers high sensitivity, specificity, and rapid results, making it an effective testing system for farmers, researchers, and regulatory bodies concerned with virus detection. The ToMV antigen, purified through physicochemical methods, was administered along with an isotonic NaCl solution into the ear vein of an “Albinos” rabbit to produce the polyclonal antiserum. During immunization, the antigen quantity was gradually increased. The antiserum’s initial titer was 1:128, which increased to 1:512 after re-immunization. The developed polyclonal antiserum demonstrated high sensitivity in detecting ToMV. It was also successfully used to diagnose various tomato cultivars infected with ToMV.

Keywords Tobamovirus, Tomato mosaic virus, Antigen, Polyclonal antiserum, Antibody, Double immunodiffusion

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is an economically important vegetable grown worldwide in almost all climates and environments.

Tomato plants are affected by many pathogens (Blancard 2012; Jones et al. 2016), which cause serious economic losses to the quantity and quality of tomato production (Mrkvová et al. 2022; Panno et al. 2021; Tolman et al. 2004). 136 tomato virus species infect tomatoes naturally and they are the biggest threat to tomato production worldwide (Hanssen et al. 2010; Nadeem et al. 2022; Ullah et al. 2017; Ullah et al. 2019).

An important group of tomato pathogenic viruses is 37 virus species belonging to the Tobamovirus genus of the Virgaviridae family (ICTV 2021). Many tobamoviruses, such as Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV), Tobacco mild green mosaic virus (TMGMV), Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), Tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV), and Tomato mottle mosaic (ToMMV), infect tomatoes naturally (Hancinský et al. 2020; Luria et al. 2017; Mrkvová et al. 2022). Among them, the Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) is one of the highly persistent, infectious, cosmopolitan tobamoviruses and is the main limiting factor in tomato production in open fields and greenhouses (Nadeem et al. 2022; Ullah et al. 2019). Disease caused by ToMV infection has been detected in all tomato-growing areas worldwide and causes significant economic losses (Lyu et al. 2023).

The ToMV virion, like other tobamoviruses, is rod-shaped with a length of about 300 nm and a diameter of 18 nm. The viral genome consists of positive-stranded ssRNA, about 6400 nucleotides long. It encodes four proteins: a 130-kDa protein, its read-through product of 180 kDa, a 30-kDa protein, and the CP (17.5 kDa) (Ishibashi and Ishikawa 2016). The 130-kDa and 180-kDa proteins are involved in viral RNA replication and are collectively called replication proteins. The 30-kDa protein is essential for cell-to-cell transmission of the virus and is therefore called the movement protein (MP). ORF4 encodes a coat protein (CP) of approximately 17.5 kDa (Meshi et al. 1992; Mrkvová et al. 2022). In addition to the function of virion production, the coat protein of ToMV also plays a role in long-distance transmission of the virus (Li et al. 2005).

Tomato mosaic virus is the most virulent tobamovirus and has a wide host plant range. Diseases caused by ToMV infection usually do not cause the death of plants, but a mosaic of plant leaves, deformation of stems and fruits, and development of growth buds and roots are negatively affected (Ishibashi et al. 2023). The development of disease symptoms varies significantly depending on virus isolates and plant genotype, time of infection, light intensity, and temperature (Broadbent 1976; Zitter 2014). Leaves are light to dark green, sometimes accompanied by yellowing, curling, or tapering (Zitter 2014). Due to the uneven distribution of pigment in the fruits of tomato plants with mosaic disease, abnormal signs such as uneven ripening and internal darkening of the fruit occur, resulting in a decrease in their quality and loss of marketability (Broadbent and Cooper 1964; Ishibashi et al. 2023; Zitter 2014).

There are two main strategies to overcome the problems, the most important of which is the accurate and sensitive diagnosis of ToMV, which is the most important tool in managing virus diseases in tomato production.

To eliminate the problem of ToMV in agriculture, early diagnosis of the virus is the most appropriate and practical approach. In the development of science-based ways of fighting viruses, it is necessary to plant virus-free seeds, timely disposal of infected equipment, and use modern diagnostic methods, as well as the development of rapid methods for timely detection and identification of phytopathogenic viruses requires (Jovlieva et al. 2024). Immunodiagnostic methods are examples of the most common methods used to test large numbers of samples for viruses (Boonham et al. 2014; Rubio et al. 2020).

Highly specific methods for the detection of viruses are based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and together with the latest generation of sequencing technologies provide the possibility of accurate identification of viruses, detection of multiplex viruses, the amount of virus, as well as the discovery of newly emerging viruses (Mehetre et al. 2021; Rubio et al. 2020). The high specificity of PCR-based methods can sometimes lead to false-negative results as a result of mutations in the primer-binding genomic parts of the viral genome (Mrkvová et al. 2022). Immunological methods have several advantages over other methods due to their simplicity and the possibility of testing many samples at the same time (Fayziev et al. 2020; Jovlieva et al. 2024). To date, there are several phytoviruses in Uzbekistan: separation of phytopathogenic viruses such as Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV), Potato leafroll virus (PLRV), Potato virus X (PVX), Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV), Plum pox virus (PPV), Maize dwarf mosaic virus (MDMV) and a specific serum was prepared for them (Fayziev et al. 2020; Jovlieva et al. 2024; Kholmatova et al. 2024; Khusanov et al. 2020; Makhmudov et al. 2023; Sattorov et al. 2020; Sobirova et al. 2023). To date, plants such as N. tabacum and N. glutinosa L. have been used to obtain the purified preparation of ToMV.

Serological methods using polyclonal antibodies provide a versatile tool for the broad screening of phytopathogenic viruses that infect different crops (Souiri et al. 2014). The researcher does not have detailed information about the antigen strain used to produce the available commercial polyclonal antibodies for ToMV detection. Such information is obtained in the process of antiserum development, which begins with the identification, isolation, characterization, and immunization of the virus (Mrkvová et al. 2022).

Like other viruses, ToMV stores antigenic determinants in its protein coat. If a homogenous virus preparation purified from other viruses and plant proteins is injected into an animal’s body, protective proteins, i.e., antibodies, are synthesized in the animal’s blood against the virus. Artificial antibodies are of great importance in the serological diagnosis of plant viruses. This is because a specific antiserum is required for many immunological studies. Such necessary antisera often appear as a special protection, an “immune system” against various antigens (AG) in the body of several animals such as rabbits, rats, and white mice (Kerstin et al. 2010).

High titer antiserum can be obtained by injecting purified virus antigen subcutaneously, intravenously, and intramuscularly in laboratory animals. Also, the intensity of the antiserum depends on the concentration of the antigen the frequency of immunization, and the process of re-immunization (Egorov et al. 1991; Jovlieva et al. 2024).

The complete process of preparation of polyclonal antiserum to ToMV is the aim of this experimental work, during the experiments, an effective polyclonal antiserum that can be used for the detection of ToMV was prepared, and we determined the sensitivity of the prepared antiserum for the serological detection of ToMV in different varieties of tomato plants.

ToMV was isolated from a tomato plant showing symptoms of virus infection from the tomato fields of Kybrai district, Tashkent region. The leaves of this plant were collected and stored at -80°C (BDF-86V588, Biobase, China). The nucleotide sequence of the ToMV isolate CP gene was determined by Senger sequencing and deposited in the GenBank nucleotide database (OR420713.1 available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OR420713.1?report=genbank&to=677).

Antigen preparation

To carry out the research, a 50 g sample of a tomato plant leaf, which was proven to contain ToMV by PCR, was ground in a porcelain mortar by adding phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.2) in a ratio of 1:1. The resulting homogenate is spun at 7,000 rpm. centrifuged (TG16.5, Bioridge, China) at high speed for 15 minutes. The supernatant was isolated and inoculated into the Chenopodium amaranticolor L. plant under laboratory conditions. One of the necroses formed on the leaf of the Ch. amaranticolor L. plant was isolated, re-homogenized, and mechanically infected with the Datura stramonium L. plant. The yellow mosaic symptom that appeared on the leaf of D. stramonium L. was removed from the existing leaf and homogenized. Biologically pure ToMV purified from the mixed infection was obtained by re-infection three times in the same manner. 1 kg of leaves of D. stramonium L. were collected and stored at -80°C. A purified preparation of ToMV was obtained from the collected leaves of D. stramonium L. using physicochemical and gel chromatography methods in laboratory conditions, the degree of purity and virus concentration was determined, and it was placed in separate test tubes at 1mg/ml and stored at -80°C.

Immunization of experimental rabbits. Healthy albino rabbits (weight 3 kg) were selected to receive polyclonal serum to ToMV. The virus preparation was injected into the rabbit body by ear vein immunization. This process was carried out as follows. When injecting into the rabbit’s ear vein, once a week, 1 mg/ml of the pure virus preparation was mixed with 1 ml of physiological solution (NaCl 0.9%) in a ratio of 1:1, for a total of 6 injections once a week. The amount of virus was increased at each injection period after the first injection. The immunization schedule used to obtain rabbit anti-ToMV sera is shown in Table 1 (Table 1).

Table 1 Scheme of rabbit immunization to obtain antiserum against ToMV

Injection numberThe dose of purified virus injected is mg/ml
1 time1
2 times2
3 times3
4 times4
5 times5
6 times6


10 days after the last injection, 45 ml of blood was collected from the right ear vein of the rabbit. Blood was allowed to clot at room temperature for 1 day, then stored overnight at 4°C. The shaped elements of the blood were carefully separated from the serum part and spun for 5 minutes at 1500 rpm to remove the remaining shaped elements from the serum. It was centrifuged for 15 minutes (Egorov et al. 1991), and 25 ml of blood antiserum was separated from the obtained 45 ml blood sample.

30 days after blood collection, pure virus preparation was reimmunized into the rabbit ear vein. In this case, an amount of the virus preparation equal to the last dose of the virus was injected with a physiological solution in a 1:1 ratio. 10 days after reimmunization, 45 ml of blood was taken for the second time, and the serum part was purified from blood cells as mentioned above. 25 ml of antiserum was separated from 45 ml of blood taken the second time and placed in 1 ml test tubes and stored at -20°C.

To obtain hyperimmune antisera, laboratory rabbits with ToMV isolate and blood sampling procedures were carried out together with the employees of the vivarium department of the “Republican State Center for Diagnosis of Animal Diseases and Food Safety”. Experiments on rabbits from laboratory animals were carried out in compliance with all the normative rules contained in “Veterinary Legislation”. The animals were under daily clinical observation. No discomfort was observed in laboratory animals during the experiment and after the study.

Determination of antiserum titer using the double immunodiffusion method. For detection of ToMV by double immunodiffusion, 20 µl of blood serum was taken and mixed with the same amount of 0.9% NaCl solution. This serum was diluted 2 times (1:2) and was taken from this serum for further dilution. In this way, blood serum was diluted 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16, 1:32, 1:64, 1:128, 1:256, 1:512, 1:1024, 1:2048.

1% agarose gel was prepared to determine the titer of antiserum by the double immunodiffusion method. For this, 1 g of agarose gel was removed and 99 ml of 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH = 7.2) was added and the gel was completely dissolved in a microwave oven. 25 ml of gel was poured into a separate container and mixed well by adding 1 ml of antibiotic (streptomycin) to prevent bacteria from growing in liquid agar cooled to 50-55°C. It was poured onto a 9 × 12 cm glass plate placed horizontally on a flat surface. After the agarose gel solidified, wells were prepared in a row using special stamps with a hole spacing of 5 mm, and 20 µl of diluted antiserum was placed in the first row of these wells, and the same amount of viral sap, i.e., antigen (AG) was placed opposite it, the plates were kept in a desiccator with 500 ml of water and 100 µl of chloroform under them for 48 hours.

Obtaining a pure preparation of local isolates of a particular virus is important for solving practical problems such as studying its biochemical properties, preparing specific antiserum, and developing immunodiagnostic methods. ToMV was gel filtered using TSK HW-75 gel to obtain a pure virus preparation. When the optical absorption index of the obtained virus preparation was measured in a spectrophotometer (Cary-60, Agilent, USA), it was found that the peak of absorption of the preparation, that is, the maximum 260 nm, this indicator corresponds to a nucleoprotein, and the ratio of 260/280 1,2, that is, it was found to be characteristic of viruses formed based on helical symmetry. To determine the virulence of the purified virus preparation, the leaves of the N.glutinosa plant were infected mechanically, and 48 hours after inoculation, necrosis with a size of 3-4 mm typical of ToMV was observed (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Virulence determination of purified ToMV preparation (a) N. glutinosa leaf inoculated with purified ToMV preparation; (b) control healthy leaf

The purified virus drug was injected into the rabbit body with the isotonic solution for 6 weeks, and polyclonal antiserum was obtained.

The obtained polyclonal antiserum was observed to be specific for ToMV. Tomatoes infected with ToMV reacted with the extracts of plants and formed precipitate lines, but it was observed that there was no reaction with extracts from healthy plants (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Determination of the specificity of the antiserum (As) obtained to ToMV (a) plant sap obtained from a healthy tomato leaf; (b) sample from a tomato leaf infected with ToMV

The titer of antiserum isolated from the first blood (52 days after the first immunization) of an Albinos breed rabbit injected into the ear vein was 1:128 when determined by the double immunodiffusion method, and the titer of the antiserum isolated from the blood after reimmunization increased several times, that is, antiserum in the ratio 1:512 it was observed that precipitation lines were formed when diluted, and no such line appeared in antiserum diluted 1:1024 and 1:2048 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Determination of antiserum titer obtained after reimmunization by the double immunodiffusion method. As = antiserum; Ag = antigen

The titer of the antiserum obtained initially and after the reimmunization process was compared, the obtained results are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Comparison of titer of isolated antiserum before and after reimmunization

Dilution factor of antiserum
C*1/21/41/81/161/321/641/1281/2561/5121/10241/2048
Antiserum obtained before reimmunization+++++++++++++++++++++----
Antiserum received after reimmunization++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--

Note: “++++” in the table indicates that the titer of antiserum (AS) is high, “+++” is moderately high, “++” is moderate, “+” is weak, “-” is the product of the precipitation line, and “*” indicates that undiluted antiserum was used as a control. means that it is not.



During the study, the titer of the ToMV antigen isolated from D.stramonium L. was also determined using the double immunodiffusion method and was evaluated based on the precipitation lines formed between AG-AS (Table 3).

Table 3 Titer of ToMV isolated from D. stramonium L. plant

Dilution factor of antiserum
C*1:21:41:81:161:321:641:1281:2561:5121:10241:2048
Dilution factor of antigenC**++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1:2++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1:4+++++++++++++++++++++++---
1:8+++++++++++++++++++----
1:16+++++++++++++++++-----
1:32++++++++++++++++-----
1:64+++++++++++++++------
1:128++++++++++--------
1:256+++++++--------
1:512+++----------
1:1024+-----------

Note: “++++” in the table indicates that the antiserum—antigen (AS—AG) reaction is high, “+++” is moderately high, “++” is moderate, “+” is weak, “-” is a precipitation line, “*” is the undiluted antiserum, and “**” is the undiluted antigen. represents the non-formulation of.



It can be seen from the result that the titer of ToMV isolated from the D.stramonium L. plant was 1:1024 when tested based on the obtained antiserum.

The specificity of the obtained antiserum and the resistance of different varieties of tomato to ToMV were carried out in 22 varieties of tomatoes mechanically infected with the purified preparation of ToMV. In this case, 20 days after inoculation, the virus was taken from ToMV-infected tomato leaves and placed in separate porcelain mortars, and the plant juice was separated. The presence of ToMV in the isolated plant sap was determined based on the experiments conducted by the double immunodiffusion method (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. Analysis of ToMV infection rate of tomato cultivars
Note: AS = antiserum; AG = antigen; a tomato sample artificially infected with the virus was used.

Precipitation reactions between antigen and antiserum showed the presence of ToMV infection in 18 out of 22 tested samples. From the 22 samples examined based on the precipitation lines formed by antiserum obtained from ToMV, Darkon, Revansh, Blogodatniy, Perst were not infected with the virus, TMK, Sevara, Agro, Tvenid, Finish, Tanimi, Lojayin F1, N-2274, Chelnok varieties are relatively resistant and Zakovat, Fakhriy, Magnat, L-200, Ofarin, Yakut, Surkhan 142, Charodey, Ofarin-2 varieties were found to be resistant to ToMV.

Antiserum with virus-specific antibodies can be prepared by isolating the antigen from the infected plant, purifying virus particles, and immunizing animals (Garcia-Calvo et al. 2021). A common problem in obtaining specific antibodies to plant viruses is obtaining purified virus antigens to immunize laboratory animals (Lima et al. 2001). Obtaining polyclonal antiserum is considered important for quick and accurate diagnosis of viruses by ELISA method in phytopathology and agricultural practice. Polyclonal antibodies recognize several similar isolates of the antigen being detected, which increases the sensitivity of the assays (Ascoli and Aggeler 2018).

As a result of similar studies, polyclonal antisera to Potato virus X (PVX) and Maize dwarf mosaic virus (MDMV) virus were obtained and used in virus detection (Jovlieva et al. 2024; Sobirova et al. 2023). These researchers obtained antiserum by injecting a purified virus preparation subcutaneously or between the muscles of a Shinshila rabbit. Lima et al. obtained a specific polyclonal antiserum by oral immunization of rabbits with a purified preparation of Cowpea severe mosaic virus (CPSMV) and Papaya lethal yellowing virus (PLYV) (Lima et al. 2001). According to Strobel and Mowat, when administered orally to an animal, only a very small amount of antigen is absorbed into the blood as antigens without being enzymatically degraded in the animal’s intestine (Strobel and Mowat 1998). For this reason, studies on antigen transfer into the blood without degradation are of great importance (Mestecky et al. 1997).

However, the results of our research showed that intravenous immunization is effective in obtaining virus-specific serum, that is, antiserum accumulates more in the rabbit’s body.

In general, the use of polyclonal antibody sera in the diagnosis of viruses can potentially detect other similar viruses, although sometimes with lower specificity. From the point of view of phytopathology and agricultural practice, it is very important to identify viruses present in plants, even if there are small changes in the virus genome that prevent them from being identified by more precise methods (Rubio et al. 2020).

Immunodiagnostic tests such as ELISA are suitable for primary mass screening of virus presence in plants, and molecular genetic methods with minimal sensitivity and high specificity are desirable to use after initial screening (Boben et al. 2007).

Different mechanisms against phytopathogenic viruses have been formed in plants, and regardless of which of these mechanisms, they are considered useful for protection against viral diseases caused by pathogens (Khalid et al. 2017; Lindbo and Falk 2017). In the course of our research, it was found that the Darkon, Revansh, Blogodatni, and Perst varieties of tomatoes have useful resistance mechanisms.

The antiserum obtained during this study can also be used in the broad screening of ToMV in different tomato cultivars using immunological methods. In our experiments, the antiserum obtained against ToMV is also suitable for the detection of ToMV spread and plant-virus interactions in agro ecological conditions.

From the analysis of the results of the conducted experiment, it became clear that it was possible to obtain high titer antiserum as a result of intravenous isotonic solution in obtaining antiserum used for the detection of ToMV. From the experiences of several authors on obtaining antiserum to viruses and the results of our research, it was concluded that the use of an albino breed of rabbit in the preparation of antiserum facilitates the process of immunization to the ear vein, and it is appropriate to use it in obtaining antiserum with a high titer compared to the Shinshila breed.

The development of diagnostic tools for the development of ToMV-resistant tomato varieties highlights the importance of basic plant protection research. It is important to develop diagnostic tools for identifying endemic strains to understand and evaluate the interaction between viruses and host plants.

This work was carried out with the financial support of the “IZ-2020122512 Development of immunodiagnostics of tomato mosaic virus” grant of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Innovation.

  1. Ascoli CA, Aggeler B (2018) Overlooked benefits of using polyclonal antibodies. BioTechniques 63:127-136
    CrossRef
  2. Blancard D (2012) Principal characteristics of pathogenic agents and methods of control. Tomato Diseases 2:413-650
    CrossRef
  3. Boben J, Kramberger P, Petrovič N, Cankar K, Peterka M, Štrancar A, Ravnikar M (2007) Detection and quantification of Tomato mosaic virus in irrigation waters. European Journal of Plant Pathology 118:59-71
    CrossRef
  4. Boonham N, Kreuze J, Winter S, van der Vlugt R, Bergervoet J, Tomlinson J, Mumford R (2014) Methods in virus diagnostics: From ELISA to next generation sequencing. Virus Res 86:20-31
    CrossRef
  5. Broadbent L (1976) Epidemiology and control of tomato mosaic virus. Annu Rev Phytopathol 14:75-96
    CrossRef
  6. Broadbent L, Cooper AJ (1964) The epidemiology of tomato mosaic: VI. The influence of tomato mosaic virus on root growth and the annual pattern of fruit production. Ann Appl Biol 54:31-43
    CrossRef
  7. Egorov AM, Osipov AP, Dzantnev BB, Gavrilova EM (1991) Theory and practice of enzyme immunoassay. Higher school, 288
  8. Fayziev V, Jovlieva D, Juraeva U, Shavkiev J, Eshboev F (2020) Effects of PVXN-UZ 915 necrotic isolate of Potato virus X on amount of pigments of Datura stramonium leaves. Journal of Critical Reviews 7(9):400-403
    CrossRef
  9. Garcia-Calvo E, García-García A, Madrid R, Martin R, García T (2021) From polyclonal sera to recombinant antibodies: A review of immunological detection of gluten in foodstuff. Foods 10:1-66
    CrossRef
  10. Hancinský R, Mihálik D, Mrkvová M, Candresse T, Glasa M (2020) Plant viruses infecting Solanaceae family members in the cultivated and wild environments: A review. Plants 9(5):667
    CrossRef
  11. Hanssen IM, Lapidot M, Thomma BP (2010) Emerging viral diseases of tomato crops. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 23:539-548. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-23-5-0539
    CrossRef
  12. ICTV (International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses) (2021) Positive-sense RNA viruses, Virgaviridae, genus: Tobamovirus. Available at https://ictv.global/report/chapter/virgaviridae/virgaviridae/tobamovirus
  13. Ishibashi K, Ishikawa M (2016) Replication of tobamovirus RNA. Annual Review of Phytopathology 54:55-78
    CrossRef
  14. Ishibashi K, Kubota K, Kano A, Ishikawa M (2023) Tobamoviruses: old and new threats to tomato cultivation. Journal of General Plant Pathology 89(6):305-321
    CrossRef
  15. Jones JB, Zitter TA, Momol TM, Miller SA (2016) Compendium of Tomato Disease and Pests. The American Phytopathological Society 176
    CrossRef
  16. Jovlieva D, Fayziev V, Vakhobov A, Ashurova K, Yusubaxmedov A, Tuychiboyev J, Mirzaeva Z, Nugmonova K (2024) Preparation of Polyclonal Antiserum for potato X virus. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity 8(1):268-278. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10206960
  17. Kerstin U, Verena S, Sergei V, Rainer F, Ulrich C (2010) Immunogenic properties of chimeric potato virus X particles displaying the Hepatitis C virus hypervariable region I peptide R9. Journal of Virological Methods 166:12-20
    CrossRef
  18. Khalid A, Zhang Q, Yasir M, Li F (2017) Small RNA-based genetic engineering for plant viral resistance: application in crop protection. Front Microbiol 8:43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00043
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Kholmatova M, Fayziev V, Akhmadaliev B, Absamatov T, Temirov A, Tangriev T, Jovlieva D, Askarova M (2024) Molecular identification of potato leaf roll virus and its impact on important nutrients in tubers. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity 8(3):149-161. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11398192
    CrossRef
  20. Khusanov TS, Kadirova ZN, Davronov KS, Akhmedova ZR (2020) Analysis Of Lysimetric Parameters Of The Effect Of Chemical And Biological Drugs Against Alfalfa Mosaic Virus. The American Journal Of Agriculture And Biomedical Engineering 2(07):25-29
    CrossRef
  21. Li Y, Wu MY, Song HH, Hu X, Qiu BS (2005) Identification of a tobacco protein interacting with tomato mosaic virus coat protein and facilitating the long-distance movement of virus. Arch Virol 150:1993-2008
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Lima JAA, Lima RCA, Goncalves MFB (2001) Production of polyclonal antisera specific to plant viruses by rabbit oral immunization. Fitopatol Bras 26:774-777
    CrossRef
  23. Lindbo JA, Falk BW (2017) The impact of "coat protein-mediated virus resistance" in applied plant pathology and basic research. Phytopathology 107:624-634. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-12-16-0442-RVW
    CrossRef
  24. Luria N, Smith E, Reingold V, Bekelman I, Lapidot M, Levin I, Elad N, Tam Y, Sela N, Abu-Ras A, Ezra N, Haberman A, Yitzhak L, Lachman O, Dombrovsky A (2017) A New Israeli Tobamovirus Isolate Infects Tomato Plants Harboring Tm-22 Resistance Genes. PloS one 12(1):e0170429
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Lyu J, Yang Y, Sun X, Jiang S, Hong H, Zhu X, Liu Y (2023) Genetic Variability and Molecular Evolution of Tomato Mosaic Virus Populations in Three Northern China Provinces. Viruses 15(7):1617
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Makhmudov T, Kadirova ZN, Adilov BS, Abdikarimov BQ, Abduvaliev BA, Ziyaev ZM, Sherimbetov AG, Kurganov S (2023) Мolecular identification based on coat protein sequences of the barley yеllow dwarf virus from Uzbekistan. Pak J Phytopathol 35(1):127-135
    CrossRef
  27. Mehetre GT, Leo VV, Singh G, Sorokan A, Maksimov I, Yadav MK, Upadhyaya K, Hashem A, Alsaleh AN, Dawoud TM, Almaary KS, Singh BP (2021) Current Developments and Challenges in Plant Viral Diagnostics: A Systematic Review. Viruses 13(3):412. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13030412.
    CrossRef
  28. Meshi T, Watanabe Y, Okada Y (1992) Molecular pathology of tobacco mosaic virus revealed by biologically active cDNAs. In Genetic Engineering with Plant Viruses 149-186
  29. Mestecky J, Michalek SM, Moldoveanu Z, Russell MW (1997) Routes of immunization and antigen delivery systems for optimal mucosal immune responses in humans. Behring Institute Mitteilungen 98:33-43
  30. Mrkvová M, Hančinský R, Grešíková S, Kaňuková Š, Barilla J, Glasa M, Hauptvogel P, Kraic J, Mihálik D (2022) Evaluation of New Polyclonal Antibody Developed for Serological Diagnostics of Tomato Mosaic Virus. Viruses 14(6):1331. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14061331
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Nadeem S, Ullah N, Akhtar KP, Hameed A, Saleem MY (2022) Evaluation of Tomato Hybrids for Resistance against Tomato Mosaic Virus (ToMV). Journal of Botanical Research 4(2):1-11. https://doi.org/10.30564/jbr.v4i2.4579
    CrossRef
  32. Panno S, Davino S, Caruso AG, Bertacca S, Crnogorac A, Mandić A, Noris E, Matić SA (2021) A review of the most common and economically important diseases that undermine the cultivation of tomato crop in the Mediterranean basin. Agronomy 11(11):2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112188
    CrossRef
  33. Rubio L, Galipienso L, Ferriol I (2020) Detection of plant viruses and disease management: Relevance of genetic diversity and evolution. Frontiers in plant science 11:1092. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01092
    CrossRef
  34. Sattorov M, Sheveleva AA, Fayziev V, Chirkov S (2020) First report of Plum pox virus on plum in Uzbekistan. Plant Disease 104(9):2533. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-20-0456-PDN
    CrossRef
  35. Sobirova ZSh, Mutalov KA, Temirov AA, Shonazarova NI, Suyunova GU, Fayzieva NB, Berdikulova NR (2023) Molecular identification of MDMV and its effects on physiological properties of Zea mays L. SABRAO J Breed 55(6):1878-1885
    CrossRef
  36. Souiri A, Zemzami M, Amzazi S, Ennaji MM (2014) Polyclonal and monoclonal antibody-based methods for detection of plant viruses. Eur J Sci Res 123:281-295
  37. Strobel S, Mowat AMCL (1998) Immune responses to dietary antigens: Oral tolerance. Immunology Today 19:173-181
    CrossRef
  38. Tolman JH, McLeod DGR, Harris CR (2004) Cost of crop losses in processing tomato and cabbage in southwestern Ontario due to insects, weeds and/or diseases. Can J Plant Sci 84:915-921. https://doi.org/10.4141/P03-002
    CrossRef
  39. Ullah N, Akhtar KP, Saleem MY, Habib M (2019) Characterization of tomato mosaic virus and search for its resistance in Solanum species. European journal of plant pathology 155:1195-1209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-019-01848-2
    CrossRef
  40. Ullah N, Ali ASAD, Ahmad M, Fahim M, Din N, Ahmad F (2017) Evaluation of tomato genotypes against tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) and its effect on yield contributing parameters. Pak J Bot 49(4):1585-1592
  41. Zitter TA (2014) Tobacco mosaic virus and tomato mosaic virus. Compendium of tomato diseases and pests. APS Press, 90-91

Article

Research Article

J Plant Biotechnol 2024; 51(1): 265-272

Published online October 11, 2024 https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2024.51.025.265

Copyright © The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology.

Preparation of polyclonal antiserum to Tomato mosaic virus and its application as a viral diagnostic test

Boburbek Akhmadaliev · Bobir Abduvaliev · Bakhtiyor Adilov · Shakhnoza Aripova · Zarifa Kadirova · Bobur Abdikarimov · Tokhir Makhmudov · Anvar Sherimbetov · Dilshod Ruzmetov · Bahodir Eshchanov

1Unique Object Collection of Phytopathogens and Other Microorganisms, Institute of Genetics and Plant Experimental Biology, Academy of Sciences of Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, 111226, Uzbekistan
2Laboratory of Plant Immunity, Institute of Genetics and Plant Experimental Biology, Academy of Sciences of Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, 111226, Uzbekistan
3Research Institute of Vegetable, Melon Crops, and Potato, Tashkent, 111106, Uzbekistan
4National Center for Agricultural Knowledge and Innovations. Sh. Rashidov Street Building #1, A. Yassavi Community Gathering, Yuqorichirchiq district, Tashkent region, 111909, Uzbekistan

Correspondence to:B. Akhmadaliev (✉)
e-mail: ahmadaliyev_bobur@mail.ru

Received: 30 August 2024; Revised: 26 September 2024; Accepted: 26 September 2024; Published: 11 October 2024.

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In recent years, the expansion of international seed exports of vegetable crops has led to the spread of both endemic and non-endemic strains of viruses globally. Among these, the Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) poses a significant threat to the global vegetable industry, particularly the tomato sector, resulting in substantial economic losses. Due to its high pathogenicity and rapid spread, ToMV has been detected in almost all countries, severely impacting the production of tomatoes and other vegetable crops. Creating a rapid and accurate diagnostic test for ToMV is crucial for preventing this infectious disease and developing control measures. A practical approach to mitigate ToMV’s impact involves early virus detection while the plant is asymptomatic. This study presents the results of research focused on the preparation of polyclonal antiserum, which is crucial for the immunodiagnostics of ToMV, ensuring high sensitivity and specificity. This modern approach offers high sensitivity, specificity, and rapid results, making it an effective testing system for farmers, researchers, and regulatory bodies concerned with virus detection. The ToMV antigen, purified through physicochemical methods, was administered along with an isotonic NaCl solution into the ear vein of an “Albinos” rabbit to produce the polyclonal antiserum. During immunization, the antigen quantity was gradually increased. The antiserum’s initial titer was 1:128, which increased to 1:512 after re-immunization. The developed polyclonal antiserum demonstrated high sensitivity in detecting ToMV. It was also successfully used to diagnose various tomato cultivars infected with ToMV.

Keywords: Tobamovirus, Tomato mosaic virus, Antigen, Polyclonal antiserum, Antibody, Double immunodiffusion

Introduction

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is an economically important vegetable grown worldwide in almost all climates and environments.

Tomato plants are affected by many pathogens (Blancard 2012; Jones et al. 2016), which cause serious economic losses to the quantity and quality of tomato production (Mrkvová et al. 2022; Panno et al. 2021; Tolman et al. 2004). 136 tomato virus species infect tomatoes naturally and they are the biggest threat to tomato production worldwide (Hanssen et al. 2010; Nadeem et al. 2022; Ullah et al. 2017; Ullah et al. 2019).

An important group of tomato pathogenic viruses is 37 virus species belonging to the Tobamovirus genus of the Virgaviridae family (ICTV 2021). Many tobamoviruses, such as Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV), Tobacco mild green mosaic virus (TMGMV), Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), Tomato brown rugose fruit virus (ToBRFV), and Tomato mottle mosaic (ToMMV), infect tomatoes naturally (Hancinský et al. 2020; Luria et al. 2017; Mrkvová et al. 2022). Among them, the Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) is one of the highly persistent, infectious, cosmopolitan tobamoviruses and is the main limiting factor in tomato production in open fields and greenhouses (Nadeem et al. 2022; Ullah et al. 2019). Disease caused by ToMV infection has been detected in all tomato-growing areas worldwide and causes significant economic losses (Lyu et al. 2023).

The ToMV virion, like other tobamoviruses, is rod-shaped with a length of about 300 nm and a diameter of 18 nm. The viral genome consists of positive-stranded ssRNA, about 6400 nucleotides long. It encodes four proteins: a 130-kDa protein, its read-through product of 180 kDa, a 30-kDa protein, and the CP (17.5 kDa) (Ishibashi and Ishikawa 2016). The 130-kDa and 180-kDa proteins are involved in viral RNA replication and are collectively called replication proteins. The 30-kDa protein is essential for cell-to-cell transmission of the virus and is therefore called the movement protein (MP). ORF4 encodes a coat protein (CP) of approximately 17.5 kDa (Meshi et al. 1992; Mrkvová et al. 2022). In addition to the function of virion production, the coat protein of ToMV also plays a role in long-distance transmission of the virus (Li et al. 2005).

Tomato mosaic virus is the most virulent tobamovirus and has a wide host plant range. Diseases caused by ToMV infection usually do not cause the death of plants, but a mosaic of plant leaves, deformation of stems and fruits, and development of growth buds and roots are negatively affected (Ishibashi et al. 2023). The development of disease symptoms varies significantly depending on virus isolates and plant genotype, time of infection, light intensity, and temperature (Broadbent 1976; Zitter 2014). Leaves are light to dark green, sometimes accompanied by yellowing, curling, or tapering (Zitter 2014). Due to the uneven distribution of pigment in the fruits of tomato plants with mosaic disease, abnormal signs such as uneven ripening and internal darkening of the fruit occur, resulting in a decrease in their quality and loss of marketability (Broadbent and Cooper 1964; Ishibashi et al. 2023; Zitter 2014).

There are two main strategies to overcome the problems, the most important of which is the accurate and sensitive diagnosis of ToMV, which is the most important tool in managing virus diseases in tomato production.

To eliminate the problem of ToMV in agriculture, early diagnosis of the virus is the most appropriate and practical approach. In the development of science-based ways of fighting viruses, it is necessary to plant virus-free seeds, timely disposal of infected equipment, and use modern diagnostic methods, as well as the development of rapid methods for timely detection and identification of phytopathogenic viruses requires (Jovlieva et al. 2024). Immunodiagnostic methods are examples of the most common methods used to test large numbers of samples for viruses (Boonham et al. 2014; Rubio et al. 2020).

Highly specific methods for the detection of viruses are based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and together with the latest generation of sequencing technologies provide the possibility of accurate identification of viruses, detection of multiplex viruses, the amount of virus, as well as the discovery of newly emerging viruses (Mehetre et al. 2021; Rubio et al. 2020). The high specificity of PCR-based methods can sometimes lead to false-negative results as a result of mutations in the primer-binding genomic parts of the viral genome (Mrkvová et al. 2022). Immunological methods have several advantages over other methods due to their simplicity and the possibility of testing many samples at the same time (Fayziev et al. 2020; Jovlieva et al. 2024). To date, there are several phytoviruses in Uzbekistan: separation of phytopathogenic viruses such as Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV), Potato leafroll virus (PLRV), Potato virus X (PVX), Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV), Plum pox virus (PPV), Maize dwarf mosaic virus (MDMV) and a specific serum was prepared for them (Fayziev et al. 2020; Jovlieva et al. 2024; Kholmatova et al. 2024; Khusanov et al. 2020; Makhmudov et al. 2023; Sattorov et al. 2020; Sobirova et al. 2023). To date, plants such as N. tabacum and N. glutinosa L. have been used to obtain the purified preparation of ToMV.

Serological methods using polyclonal antibodies provide a versatile tool for the broad screening of phytopathogenic viruses that infect different crops (Souiri et al. 2014). The researcher does not have detailed information about the antigen strain used to produce the available commercial polyclonal antibodies for ToMV detection. Such information is obtained in the process of antiserum development, which begins with the identification, isolation, characterization, and immunization of the virus (Mrkvová et al. 2022).

Like other viruses, ToMV stores antigenic determinants in its protein coat. If a homogenous virus preparation purified from other viruses and plant proteins is injected into an animal’s body, protective proteins, i.e., antibodies, are synthesized in the animal’s blood against the virus. Artificial antibodies are of great importance in the serological diagnosis of plant viruses. This is because a specific antiserum is required for many immunological studies. Such necessary antisera often appear as a special protection, an “immune system” against various antigens (AG) in the body of several animals such as rabbits, rats, and white mice (Kerstin et al. 2010).

High titer antiserum can be obtained by injecting purified virus antigen subcutaneously, intravenously, and intramuscularly in laboratory animals. Also, the intensity of the antiserum depends on the concentration of the antigen the frequency of immunization, and the process of re-immunization (Egorov et al. 1991; Jovlieva et al. 2024).

The complete process of preparation of polyclonal antiserum to ToMV is the aim of this experimental work, during the experiments, an effective polyclonal antiserum that can be used for the detection of ToMV was prepared, and we determined the sensitivity of the prepared antiserum for the serological detection of ToMV in different varieties of tomato plants.

Materials and Methods

ToMV was isolated from a tomato plant showing symptoms of virus infection from the tomato fields of Kybrai district, Tashkent region. The leaves of this plant were collected and stored at -80°C (BDF-86V588, Biobase, China). The nucleotide sequence of the ToMV isolate CP gene was determined by Senger sequencing and deposited in the GenBank nucleotide database (OR420713.1 available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OR420713.1?report=genbank&to=677).

Antigen preparation

To carry out the research, a 50 g sample of a tomato plant leaf, which was proven to contain ToMV by PCR, was ground in a porcelain mortar by adding phosphate buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.2) in a ratio of 1:1. The resulting homogenate is spun at 7,000 rpm. centrifuged (TG16.5, Bioridge, China) at high speed for 15 minutes. The supernatant was isolated and inoculated into the Chenopodium amaranticolor L. plant under laboratory conditions. One of the necroses formed on the leaf of the Ch. amaranticolor L. plant was isolated, re-homogenized, and mechanically infected with the Datura stramonium L. plant. The yellow mosaic symptom that appeared on the leaf of D. stramonium L. was removed from the existing leaf and homogenized. Biologically pure ToMV purified from the mixed infection was obtained by re-infection three times in the same manner. 1 kg of leaves of D. stramonium L. were collected and stored at -80°C. A purified preparation of ToMV was obtained from the collected leaves of D. stramonium L. using physicochemical and gel chromatography methods in laboratory conditions, the degree of purity and virus concentration was determined, and it was placed in separate test tubes at 1mg/ml and stored at -80°C.

Immunization of experimental rabbits. Healthy albino rabbits (weight 3 kg) were selected to receive polyclonal serum to ToMV. The virus preparation was injected into the rabbit body by ear vein immunization. This process was carried out as follows. When injecting into the rabbit’s ear vein, once a week, 1 mg/ml of the pure virus preparation was mixed with 1 ml of physiological solution (NaCl 0.9%) in a ratio of 1:1, for a total of 6 injections once a week. The amount of virus was increased at each injection period after the first injection. The immunization schedule used to obtain rabbit anti-ToMV sera is shown in Table 1 (Table 1).

Table 1 . Scheme of rabbit immunization to obtain antiserum against ToMV.

Injection numberThe dose of purified virus injected is mg/ml
1 time1
2 times2
3 times3
4 times4
5 times5
6 times6


10 days after the last injection, 45 ml of blood was collected from the right ear vein of the rabbit. Blood was allowed to clot at room temperature for 1 day, then stored overnight at 4°C. The shaped elements of the blood were carefully separated from the serum part and spun for 5 minutes at 1500 rpm to remove the remaining shaped elements from the serum. It was centrifuged for 15 minutes (Egorov et al. 1991), and 25 ml of blood antiserum was separated from the obtained 45 ml blood sample.

30 days after blood collection, pure virus preparation was reimmunized into the rabbit ear vein. In this case, an amount of the virus preparation equal to the last dose of the virus was injected with a physiological solution in a 1:1 ratio. 10 days after reimmunization, 45 ml of blood was taken for the second time, and the serum part was purified from blood cells as mentioned above. 25 ml of antiserum was separated from 45 ml of blood taken the second time and placed in 1 ml test tubes and stored at -20°C.

To obtain hyperimmune antisera, laboratory rabbits with ToMV isolate and blood sampling procedures were carried out together with the employees of the vivarium department of the “Republican State Center for Diagnosis of Animal Diseases and Food Safety”. Experiments on rabbits from laboratory animals were carried out in compliance with all the normative rules contained in “Veterinary Legislation”. The animals were under daily clinical observation. No discomfort was observed in laboratory animals during the experiment and after the study.

Determination of antiserum titer using the double immunodiffusion method. For detection of ToMV by double immunodiffusion, 20 µl of blood serum was taken and mixed with the same amount of 0.9% NaCl solution. This serum was diluted 2 times (1:2) and was taken from this serum for further dilution. In this way, blood serum was diluted 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16, 1:32, 1:64, 1:128, 1:256, 1:512, 1:1024, 1:2048.

1% agarose gel was prepared to determine the titer of antiserum by the double immunodiffusion method. For this, 1 g of agarose gel was removed and 99 ml of 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH = 7.2) was added and the gel was completely dissolved in a microwave oven. 25 ml of gel was poured into a separate container and mixed well by adding 1 ml of antibiotic (streptomycin) to prevent bacteria from growing in liquid agar cooled to 50-55°C. It was poured onto a 9 × 12 cm glass plate placed horizontally on a flat surface. After the agarose gel solidified, wells were prepared in a row using special stamps with a hole spacing of 5 mm, and 20 µl of diluted antiserum was placed in the first row of these wells, and the same amount of viral sap, i.e., antigen (AG) was placed opposite it, the plates were kept in a desiccator with 500 ml of water and 100 µl of chloroform under them for 48 hours.

Results

Obtaining a pure preparation of local isolates of a particular virus is important for solving practical problems such as studying its biochemical properties, preparing specific antiserum, and developing immunodiagnostic methods. ToMV was gel filtered using TSK HW-75 gel to obtain a pure virus preparation. When the optical absorption index of the obtained virus preparation was measured in a spectrophotometer (Cary-60, Agilent, USA), it was found that the peak of absorption of the preparation, that is, the maximum 260 nm, this indicator corresponds to a nucleoprotein, and the ratio of 260/280 1,2, that is, it was found to be characteristic of viruses formed based on helical symmetry. To determine the virulence of the purified virus preparation, the leaves of the N.glutinosa plant were infected mechanically, and 48 hours after inoculation, necrosis with a size of 3-4 mm typical of ToMV was observed (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Virulence determination of purified ToMV preparation (a) N. glutinosa leaf inoculated with purified ToMV preparation; (b) control healthy leaf

The purified virus drug was injected into the rabbit body with the isotonic solution for 6 weeks, and polyclonal antiserum was obtained.

The obtained polyclonal antiserum was observed to be specific for ToMV. Tomatoes infected with ToMV reacted with the extracts of plants and formed precipitate lines, but it was observed that there was no reaction with extracts from healthy plants (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Determination of the specificity of the antiserum (As) obtained to ToMV (a) plant sap obtained from a healthy tomato leaf; (b) sample from a tomato leaf infected with ToMV

The titer of antiserum isolated from the first blood (52 days after the first immunization) of an Albinos breed rabbit injected into the ear vein was 1:128 when determined by the double immunodiffusion method, and the titer of the antiserum isolated from the blood after reimmunization increased several times, that is, antiserum in the ratio 1:512 it was observed that precipitation lines were formed when diluted, and no such line appeared in antiserum diluted 1:1024 and 1:2048 (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Determination of antiserum titer obtained after reimmunization by the double immunodiffusion method. As = antiserum; Ag = antigen

The titer of the antiserum obtained initially and after the reimmunization process was compared, the obtained results are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 . Comparison of titer of isolated antiserum before and after reimmunization.

Dilution factor of antiserum
C*1/21/41/81/161/321/641/1281/2561/5121/10241/2048
Antiserum obtained before reimmunization+++++++++++++++++++++----
Antiserum received after reimmunization++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--

Note: “++++” in the table indicates that the titer of antiserum (AS) is high, “+++” is moderately high, “++” is moderate, “+” is weak, “-” is the product of the precipitation line, and “*” indicates that undiluted antiserum was used as a control. means that it is not..



During the study, the titer of the ToMV antigen isolated from D.stramonium L. was also determined using the double immunodiffusion method and was evaluated based on the precipitation lines formed between AG-AS (Table 3).

Table 3 . Titer of ToMV isolated from D. stramonium L. plant.

Dilution factor of antiserum
C*1:21:41:81:161:321:641:1281:2561:5121:10241:2048
Dilution factor of antigenC**++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1:2++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1:4+++++++++++++++++++++++---
1:8+++++++++++++++++++----
1:16+++++++++++++++++-----
1:32++++++++++++++++-----
1:64+++++++++++++++------
1:128++++++++++--------
1:256+++++++--------
1:512+++----------
1:1024+-----------

Note: “++++” in the table indicates that the antiserum—antigen (AS—AG) reaction is high, “+++” is moderately high, “++” is moderate, “+” is weak, “-” is a precipitation line, “*” is the undiluted antiserum, and “**” is the undiluted antigen. represents the non-formulation of..



It can be seen from the result that the titer of ToMV isolated from the D.stramonium L. plant was 1:1024 when tested based on the obtained antiserum.

The specificity of the obtained antiserum and the resistance of different varieties of tomato to ToMV were carried out in 22 varieties of tomatoes mechanically infected with the purified preparation of ToMV. In this case, 20 days after inoculation, the virus was taken from ToMV-infected tomato leaves and placed in separate porcelain mortars, and the plant juice was separated. The presence of ToMV in the isolated plant sap was determined based on the experiments conducted by the double immunodiffusion method (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. Analysis of ToMV infection rate of tomato cultivars
Note: AS = antiserum; AG = antigen; a tomato sample artificially infected with the virus was used.

Precipitation reactions between antigen and antiserum showed the presence of ToMV infection in 18 out of 22 tested samples. From the 22 samples examined based on the precipitation lines formed by antiserum obtained from ToMV, Darkon, Revansh, Blogodatniy, Perst were not infected with the virus, TMK, Sevara, Agro, Tvenid, Finish, Tanimi, Lojayin F1, N-2274, Chelnok varieties are relatively resistant and Zakovat, Fakhriy, Magnat, L-200, Ofarin, Yakut, Surkhan 142, Charodey, Ofarin-2 varieties were found to be resistant to ToMV.

Discussion

Antiserum with virus-specific antibodies can be prepared by isolating the antigen from the infected plant, purifying virus particles, and immunizing animals (Garcia-Calvo et al. 2021). A common problem in obtaining specific antibodies to plant viruses is obtaining purified virus antigens to immunize laboratory animals (Lima et al. 2001). Obtaining polyclonal antiserum is considered important for quick and accurate diagnosis of viruses by ELISA method in phytopathology and agricultural practice. Polyclonal antibodies recognize several similar isolates of the antigen being detected, which increases the sensitivity of the assays (Ascoli and Aggeler 2018).

As a result of similar studies, polyclonal antisera to Potato virus X (PVX) and Maize dwarf mosaic virus (MDMV) virus were obtained and used in virus detection (Jovlieva et al. 2024; Sobirova et al. 2023). These researchers obtained antiserum by injecting a purified virus preparation subcutaneously or between the muscles of a Shinshila rabbit. Lima et al. obtained a specific polyclonal antiserum by oral immunization of rabbits with a purified preparation of Cowpea severe mosaic virus (CPSMV) and Papaya lethal yellowing virus (PLYV) (Lima et al. 2001). According to Strobel and Mowat, when administered orally to an animal, only a very small amount of antigen is absorbed into the blood as antigens without being enzymatically degraded in the animal’s intestine (Strobel and Mowat 1998). For this reason, studies on antigen transfer into the blood without degradation are of great importance (Mestecky et al. 1997).

However, the results of our research showed that intravenous immunization is effective in obtaining virus-specific serum, that is, antiserum accumulates more in the rabbit’s body.

In general, the use of polyclonal antibody sera in the diagnosis of viruses can potentially detect other similar viruses, although sometimes with lower specificity. From the point of view of phytopathology and agricultural practice, it is very important to identify viruses present in plants, even if there are small changes in the virus genome that prevent them from being identified by more precise methods (Rubio et al. 2020).

Immunodiagnostic tests such as ELISA are suitable for primary mass screening of virus presence in plants, and molecular genetic methods with minimal sensitivity and high specificity are desirable to use after initial screening (Boben et al. 2007).

Different mechanisms against phytopathogenic viruses have been formed in plants, and regardless of which of these mechanisms, they are considered useful for protection against viral diseases caused by pathogens (Khalid et al. 2017; Lindbo and Falk 2017). In the course of our research, it was found that the Darkon, Revansh, Blogodatni, and Perst varieties of tomatoes have useful resistance mechanisms.

Conclusion

The antiserum obtained during this study can also be used in the broad screening of ToMV in different tomato cultivars using immunological methods. In our experiments, the antiserum obtained against ToMV is also suitable for the detection of ToMV spread and plant-virus interactions in agro ecological conditions.

From the analysis of the results of the conducted experiment, it became clear that it was possible to obtain high titer antiserum as a result of intravenous isotonic solution in obtaining antiserum used for the detection of ToMV. From the experiences of several authors on obtaining antiserum to viruses and the results of our research, it was concluded that the use of an albino breed of rabbit in the preparation of antiserum facilitates the process of immunization to the ear vein, and it is appropriate to use it in obtaining antiserum with a high titer compared to the Shinshila breed.

The development of diagnostic tools for the development of ToMV-resistant tomato varieties highlights the importance of basic plant protection research. It is important to develop diagnostic tools for identifying endemic strains to understand and evaluate the interaction between viruses and host plants.

Acknowledgement

This work was carried out with the financial support of the “IZ-2020122512 Development of immunodiagnostics of tomato mosaic virus” grant of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Innovation.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Virulence determination of purified ToMV preparation (a) N. glutinosa leaf inoculated with purified ToMV preparation; (b) control healthy leaf
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2024; 51: 265-272https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2024.51.025.265

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Determination of the specificity of the antiserum (As) obtained to ToMV (a) plant sap obtained from a healthy tomato leaf; (b) sample from a tomato leaf infected with ToMV
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2024; 51: 265-272https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2024.51.025.265

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Determination of antiserum titer obtained after reimmunization by the double immunodiffusion method. As = antiserum; Ag = antigen
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2024; 51: 265-272https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2024.51.025.265

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Analysis of ToMV infection rate of tomato cultivars
Note: AS = antiserum; AG = antigen; a tomato sample artificially infected with the virus was used.
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2024; 51: 265-272https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2024.51.025.265

Table 1 . Scheme of rabbit immunization to obtain antiserum against ToMV.

Injection numberThe dose of purified virus injected is mg/ml
1 time1
2 times2
3 times3
4 times4
5 times5
6 times6

Table 2 . Comparison of titer of isolated antiserum before and after reimmunization.

Dilution factor of antiserum
C*1/21/41/81/161/321/641/1281/2561/5121/10241/2048
Antiserum obtained before reimmunization+++++++++++++++++++++----
Antiserum received after reimmunization++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--

Note: “++++” in the table indicates that the titer of antiserum (AS) is high, “+++” is moderately high, “++” is moderate, “+” is weak, “-” is the product of the precipitation line, and “*” indicates that undiluted antiserum was used as a control. means that it is not..


Table 3 . Titer of ToMV isolated from D. stramonium L. plant.

Dilution factor of antiserum
C*1:21:41:81:161:321:641:1281:2561:5121:10241:2048
Dilution factor of antigenC**++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1:2++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1:4+++++++++++++++++++++++---
1:8+++++++++++++++++++----
1:16+++++++++++++++++-----
1:32++++++++++++++++-----
1:64+++++++++++++++------
1:128++++++++++--------
1:256+++++++--------
1:512+++----------
1:1024+-----------

Note: “++++” in the table indicates that the antiserum—antigen (AS—AG) reaction is high, “+++” is moderately high, “++” is moderate, “+” is weak, “-” is a precipitation line, “*” is the undiluted antiserum, and “**” is the undiluted antigen. represents the non-formulation of..


References

  1. Ascoli CA, Aggeler B (2018) Overlooked benefits of using polyclonal antibodies. BioTechniques 63:127-136
    CrossRef
  2. Blancard D (2012) Principal characteristics of pathogenic agents and methods of control. Tomato Diseases 2:413-650
    CrossRef
  3. Boben J, Kramberger P, Petrovič N, Cankar K, Peterka M, Štrancar A, Ravnikar M (2007) Detection and quantification of Tomato mosaic virus in irrigation waters. European Journal of Plant Pathology 118:59-71
    CrossRef
  4. Boonham N, Kreuze J, Winter S, van der Vlugt R, Bergervoet J, Tomlinson J, Mumford R (2014) Methods in virus diagnostics: From ELISA to next generation sequencing. Virus Res 86:20-31
    CrossRef
  5. Broadbent L (1976) Epidemiology and control of tomato mosaic virus. Annu Rev Phytopathol 14:75-96
    CrossRef
  6. Broadbent L, Cooper AJ (1964) The epidemiology of tomato mosaic: VI. The influence of tomato mosaic virus on root growth and the annual pattern of fruit production. Ann Appl Biol 54:31-43
    CrossRef
  7. Egorov AM, Osipov AP, Dzantnev BB, Gavrilova EM (1991) Theory and practice of enzyme immunoassay. Higher school, 288
  8. Fayziev V, Jovlieva D, Juraeva U, Shavkiev J, Eshboev F (2020) Effects of PVXN-UZ 915 necrotic isolate of Potato virus X on amount of pigments of Datura stramonium leaves. Journal of Critical Reviews 7(9):400-403
    CrossRef
  9. Garcia-Calvo E, García-García A, Madrid R, Martin R, García T (2021) From polyclonal sera to recombinant antibodies: A review of immunological detection of gluten in foodstuff. Foods 10:1-66
    CrossRef
  10. Hancinský R, Mihálik D, Mrkvová M, Candresse T, Glasa M (2020) Plant viruses infecting Solanaceae family members in the cultivated and wild environments: A review. Plants 9(5):667
    CrossRef
  11. Hanssen IM, Lapidot M, Thomma BP (2010) Emerging viral diseases of tomato crops. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 23:539-548. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-23-5-0539
    CrossRef
  12. ICTV (International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses) (2021) Positive-sense RNA viruses, Virgaviridae, genus: Tobamovirus. Available at https://ictv.global/report/chapter/virgaviridae/virgaviridae/tobamovirus
  13. Ishibashi K, Ishikawa M (2016) Replication of tobamovirus RNA. Annual Review of Phytopathology 54:55-78
    CrossRef
  14. Ishibashi K, Kubota K, Kano A, Ishikawa M (2023) Tobamoviruses: old and new threats to tomato cultivation. Journal of General Plant Pathology 89(6):305-321
    CrossRef
  15. Jones JB, Zitter TA, Momol TM, Miller SA (2016) Compendium of Tomato Disease and Pests. The American Phytopathological Society 176
    CrossRef
  16. Jovlieva D, Fayziev V, Vakhobov A, Ashurova K, Yusubaxmedov A, Tuychiboyev J, Mirzaeva Z, Nugmonova K (2024) Preparation of Polyclonal Antiserum for potato X virus. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity 8(1):268-278. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10206960
  17. Kerstin U, Verena S, Sergei V, Rainer F, Ulrich C (2010) Immunogenic properties of chimeric potato virus X particles displaying the Hepatitis C virus hypervariable region I peptide R9. Journal of Virological Methods 166:12-20
    CrossRef
  18. Khalid A, Zhang Q, Yasir M, Li F (2017) Small RNA-based genetic engineering for plant viral resistance: application in crop protection. Front Microbiol 8:43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00043
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Kholmatova M, Fayziev V, Akhmadaliev B, Absamatov T, Temirov A, Tangriev T, Jovlieva D, Askarova M (2024) Molecular identification of potato leaf roll virus and its impact on important nutrients in tubers. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity 8(3):149-161. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11398192
    CrossRef
  20. Khusanov TS, Kadirova ZN, Davronov KS, Akhmedova ZR (2020) Analysis Of Lysimetric Parameters Of The Effect Of Chemical And Biological Drugs Against Alfalfa Mosaic Virus. The American Journal Of Agriculture And Biomedical Engineering 2(07):25-29
    CrossRef
  21. Li Y, Wu MY, Song HH, Hu X, Qiu BS (2005) Identification of a tobacco protein interacting with tomato mosaic virus coat protein and facilitating the long-distance movement of virus. Arch Virol 150:1993-2008
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Lima JAA, Lima RCA, Goncalves MFB (2001) Production of polyclonal antisera specific to plant viruses by rabbit oral immunization. Fitopatol Bras 26:774-777
    CrossRef
  23. Lindbo JA, Falk BW (2017) The impact of "coat protein-mediated virus resistance" in applied plant pathology and basic research. Phytopathology 107:624-634. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-12-16-0442-RVW
    CrossRef
  24. Luria N, Smith E, Reingold V, Bekelman I, Lapidot M, Levin I, Elad N, Tam Y, Sela N, Abu-Ras A, Ezra N, Haberman A, Yitzhak L, Lachman O, Dombrovsky A (2017) A New Israeli Tobamovirus Isolate Infects Tomato Plants Harboring Tm-22 Resistance Genes. PloS one 12(1):e0170429
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Lyu J, Yang Y, Sun X, Jiang S, Hong H, Zhu X, Liu Y (2023) Genetic Variability and Molecular Evolution of Tomato Mosaic Virus Populations in Three Northern China Provinces. Viruses 15(7):1617
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  26. Makhmudov T, Kadirova ZN, Adilov BS, Abdikarimov BQ, Abduvaliev BA, Ziyaev ZM, Sherimbetov AG, Kurganov S (2023) Мolecular identification based on coat protein sequences of the barley yеllow dwarf virus from Uzbekistan. Pak J Phytopathol 35(1):127-135
    CrossRef
  27. Mehetre GT, Leo VV, Singh G, Sorokan A, Maksimov I, Yadav MK, Upadhyaya K, Hashem A, Alsaleh AN, Dawoud TM, Almaary KS, Singh BP (2021) Current Developments and Challenges in Plant Viral Diagnostics: A Systematic Review. Viruses 13(3):412. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13030412.
    CrossRef
  28. Meshi T, Watanabe Y, Okada Y (1992) Molecular pathology of tobacco mosaic virus revealed by biologically active cDNAs. In Genetic Engineering with Plant Viruses 149-186
  29. Mestecky J, Michalek SM, Moldoveanu Z, Russell MW (1997) Routes of immunization and antigen delivery systems for optimal mucosal immune responses in humans. Behring Institute Mitteilungen 98:33-43
  30. Mrkvová M, Hančinský R, Grešíková S, Kaňuková Š, Barilla J, Glasa M, Hauptvogel P, Kraic J, Mihálik D (2022) Evaluation of New Polyclonal Antibody Developed for Serological Diagnostics of Tomato Mosaic Virus. Viruses 14(6):1331. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14061331
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  31. Nadeem S, Ullah N, Akhtar KP, Hameed A, Saleem MY (2022) Evaluation of Tomato Hybrids for Resistance against Tomato Mosaic Virus (ToMV). Journal of Botanical Research 4(2):1-11. https://doi.org/10.30564/jbr.v4i2.4579
    CrossRef
  32. Panno S, Davino S, Caruso AG, Bertacca S, Crnogorac A, Mandić A, Noris E, Matić SA (2021) A review of the most common and economically important diseases that undermine the cultivation of tomato crop in the Mediterranean basin. Agronomy 11(11):2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112188
    CrossRef
  33. Rubio L, Galipienso L, Ferriol I (2020) Detection of plant viruses and disease management: Relevance of genetic diversity and evolution. Frontiers in plant science 11:1092. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01092
    CrossRef
  34. Sattorov M, Sheveleva AA, Fayziev V, Chirkov S (2020) First report of Plum pox virus on plum in Uzbekistan. Plant Disease 104(9):2533. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-20-0456-PDN
    CrossRef
  35. Sobirova ZSh, Mutalov KA, Temirov AA, Shonazarova NI, Suyunova GU, Fayzieva NB, Berdikulova NR (2023) Molecular identification of MDMV and its effects on physiological properties of Zea mays L. SABRAO J Breed 55(6):1878-1885
    CrossRef
  36. Souiri A, Zemzami M, Amzazi S, Ennaji MM (2014) Polyclonal and monoclonal antibody-based methods for detection of plant viruses. Eur J Sci Res 123:281-295
  37. Strobel S, Mowat AMCL (1998) Immune responses to dietary antigens: Oral tolerance. Immunology Today 19:173-181
    CrossRef
  38. Tolman JH, McLeod DGR, Harris CR (2004) Cost of crop losses in processing tomato and cabbage in southwestern Ontario due to insects, weeds and/or diseases. Can J Plant Sci 84:915-921. https://doi.org/10.4141/P03-002
    CrossRef
  39. Ullah N, Akhtar KP, Saleem MY, Habib M (2019) Characterization of tomato mosaic virus and search for its resistance in Solanum species. European journal of plant pathology 155:1195-1209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-019-01848-2
    CrossRef
  40. Ullah N, Ali ASAD, Ahmad M, Fahim M, Din N, Ahmad F (2017) Evaluation of tomato genotypes against tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) and its effect on yield contributing parameters. Pak J Bot 49(4):1585-1592
  41. Zitter TA (2014) Tobacco mosaic virus and tomato mosaic virus. Compendium of tomato diseases and pests. APS Press, 90-91
JPB
Vol 51. 2024

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Journal of

Plant Biotechnology

pISSN 1229-2818
eISSN 2384-1397
qr-code Download