Research Article

Split Viewer

J Plant Biotechnol (2025) 52:009-015

Published online February 5, 2025

https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2025.52.002.009

© The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology

Effect of plant growth regulators, sucrose, and silver nitrate on in vitro rose flowering

Linh Minh Hong Tran

Department of Plant Physiology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Correspondence to : M. H. T. Linh (✉)
e-mail: tmhlinh@hcmus.edu.vn

Received: 28 October 2024; Revised: 10 December 2024; Accepted: 26 December 2024; Published: 5 February 2025.

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Rosa hybrida (rose) is one of the most widely used species in the cut flower industry worldwide. Therefore, the micropropagation of R. hybrida L. has been extensively studied. However, studies that focus on the in vitro flowering of roses are scarce. In this study, various concentrations of 6-benzyladenine (BA) were used to promote shoot multiplication from rose stem nodes. A concentration of 0.5 mg/L of BA yielded the greatest shoot height and was then used in subsequent flowering experiments. Sucrose, BA, and silver nitrate (AgNO3) were used individually or in combination to supplement Murashige and Skoog medium for flowering experiments from shoots. The shoot height, fresh weight, dry weight, and flowering percentage were recorded after treatments. The rate of flowering was the highest (60.74%) when 1.0 mg/L BA, 1.0 mg/L AgNO3, and 40 g/L sucrose were added to the culture medium. Additionally, abnormal flowers in small shapes and unusual colors were observed. Flowering was also observed in treatments with higher concentrations; however, the flowers developed more abnormally.

Keywords Abnormal flower, Rosa hybrida, Cytokinins, in vitro flower, Sucrose, AgNO3

Roses, with their vibrant colors, delicate petals, and captivating fragrances, have remained a beloved choice for ornamental purposes across various cultures and regions worldwide for hundreds of years. Rose is a significant commercial ornamental crop of the Rosa genus, which belongs to the subfamily Rosoideae in the Rosaceae family (Leus et al. 2018). In vitro flowering refers to the process of inducing and studying the flowering of plants in a controlled laboratory environment, rather than in their natural habitat. This method provides researchers with a valuable tool for dissecting the intricate processes involved in plant flowering, such as the transition from vegetative growth to reproductive growth, the development of floral structures, and senescence (Nguyen and Van 2020). By examining these phenomena in a controlled setting, scientists can understand the genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors that influence plant flowering, ultimately contributing to advancements in agriculture, horticulture, and plant biology. Many previous studies have demonstrated that the addition of auxin and cytokinin to the culture medium increases the flowering rate (Vu et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2002, Zeng et al. 2013) using a sucrose concentration of 50 g/L, 3.0 mg/L BA, and 0.1 mg/L NAA, resulting in a 68.33% in vitro flowering shoot percentage (Zeng et al. 2013). Other studies focused on obtaining the highest percentage of flowering on MS medium supplemented with 3.0 mg/L BA, 0.1 mg/L NAA, and 30 g/L sucrose (Vu et al. 2006). At a concentration of 2.0 mg/L, AgNO3 effectively induced 50% of rose shoots to undergo in vitro flowering. After this, higher concentrations also exhibited induction of flowering, albeit accompanied by imperfect flower development (Matos et al. 2021). The preceding in vitro flowering studies in ornamental plants, such as Dendrobium Sonia 17 (Tee et al. 2008), Gentiana species (Zhang and Leung 2000), and Rosa species (Zeng et al. 2013), indicate that the various cytokinins investigated, BA demonstrates significant potential as an inducer of in vitro floral buds (Sreelekshmi and Siril 2021).

In vitro flowering studies have many limitations such as ethylene biosynthesis, causing leaf drop and yellowing... Therefore,

chemical inhibitors of ethylene action can be used in the culture medium to reduce these symptoms. Silver (Ag) is added to culture media to prevent bacterial contamination and to address abnormalities during micropropagation. The Ag+ ions found in silver nitrate (AgNO3) and silver thiosulfate (Ag2SO4) are typically incorporated into culture media. The ethylene receptor (ETR1) has a binding site for copper ions (Cu2+) that is crucial for ethylene signaling. When Cu2+ is replaced with Ag+, it blocks the receptor and inhibits the ethylene signals in plants (Kumar et al. 2009). Sugars produced through photosynthesis regulate essential biological processes during growth and development, such as flowering time, initiation of senescence, embryogenesis, seed germination, seedling growth, and tuber formation (Wingler et al. 2018; Yoon et al. 2020). Sucrose plays a crucial role in governing various developmental and metabolic processes in plants. In some other reports, the role of sucrose in the in vitro flowering process was also studied. For example, Vu et al. (2006) showed that a sucrose concentration of 45 g/L gave the highest flowering rate of 33.3% (Zeng et al. 2013), Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) containg 50 g/L sucrose resulted in a higher in vitro flowering rate than medium with other sucrose concentrations (Saritha and Naidu 2007).

Changes in medium composition, plant growth regulators (PGRs), or changes in culture medium can accelerate growth, shorten the vegetative period, and lead to early flowering. Additional research is required to understand better these phenomena related to the physiology of flowering. This study aimed to determine the role of some factors, such as sugar, PGRs, and AgNO3, in the in vitro flowering process of Rosa hybrida L.

Selection of explant material

The nodal explants, approximately 1.5 cm long and containing one axillary bud, were selected from the mid-stem region of 3-month-old stems in Da Lat Hasfarm Company (VietNam). The explants were initially washed under running tap water, followed by a rinse with 70% ethanol for 30 seconds, then rinsed in sterile distilled water. Next, the explants were sterilized for 3 minutes with 0.2% mercuric chloride (HgCl2). After each treatment, the explants were gently washed with sterile distilled water 3-4 times.

Experimental design

Establishment and shoot multiplication stages. Surface sterilized nodal explants (about 0.5 cm in length) were individually cultured on MS medium with BA (0.0, 0.5; 1.0, 1.5 mg/L) and 30 g/L sucrose.

Floral induction media

After 30 days in culture, the axillary buds were transferred to flower media. Individual shoots (2-3 cm in height) were collected from the shoot multiplication medium, which was found to be the most suitable for in vitro flowering based on preliminary experiments. Shoots were transferred to MS media that included individual plant growth regulators such as BA (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 mg/L), sucrose (30, 40, 50, 60 g/L), AgNO3 (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 mg/L), or a combination of BA, sucrose, and AgNO3. The MS medium was selected as the base (control) establishment medium from which various modifications were made. The culture medium was adjusted to a pH of 5.8 before autoclaving at 121°C and 1 atm for 20 minutes. Cultures containing explants per tube were incubated at 22 ± 1°C, the humidity 55-60%, in a controlled growth chamber under a 12-hour photoperiod with a light intensity of 3000 lux. Data were recorded on the number of shoots (shoots/explant), shoot height (cm), fresh weight (mg), dry weight (mg), and flowering percentage (%) after 60 days of culture.

Data analysis

All experiments were set up using a completely randomized design and were repeated three times. Each treatment consisted of three replicates, with 10 tubes per replicate. The data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 for Windows, with a one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) to determine significant differences between means at P ≤ 0.05.

Effects of BA in MS culture on in vitro multiplication of rose

When treated with different concentrations of BA, the number of shoots gradually increased with concentration, reaching the highest at BA concentrations of 1.0 and 1.5 mg/L. The tallest shoot height was at BA concentration of 0.5 (2.02 cm), then gradually decreased at BA concentrations of 1.0 and 1.5 mg/L (1.83 and 1.31cm, respectively). In contrast, the shoot multiplication rate at BA concentrations of 1.0 and 1.5 was highest after 30 days of culture. Table 1 shows that BA at a concentration of 0.5 mg/L resulted in the highest shoot height and a high shoot multiplication rate. Therefore, BA was used at a concentration of 0.5 for the flowering experiments.

Table 1 Effect of BA in Murashige and Skoog basal medium containing 30 g/L sucrose on the in vitro multiplication of rose after 30 d of culture

BA (mg/L)Shoot height (cm)Multiplication ratio
Control1.50 ± 0.07c1.78 ± 0.38c
0.52.02 ± 0.10a2.44 ± 0.38b
1.01.83 ± 0.09b3.44 ± 0.19a
1.51.31 ± 0.10d3.67 ± 0.33a

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test).

BA, 6-benzyladenine.



Effects of sucrose on in vitro flowering

The concentration of sucrose significantly affected in vitro flowering, as shown in Table 2. Medium MS supplemented with 40 and 50 g/L sucrose produced the tallest shoot height and the highest dry weight. The fresh weight also increased with sucrose treatment compared to the control group. The highest flowering rates were observed at sucrose concentrations of 40 and 50 g/L, which were 53.33% and 51.48%, respectively. However, at sucrose concentrations of 50 and 60 g/L, wilting of leaves and flowers at the shoot occurred (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Effect of sucrose on in vitro flowering after 60 d of culture in MS medium. (A) MS medium with no flower buds. (B) In vitro flowering in MS medium containing 40 g/L sucrose. (C) Flower buds with wilted leaves in MS medium supplemented with 50 g/L sucrose. (D) Wilted flower buds and leaves in MS medium supplemented with 60 g/L sucrose. (Scale bar = 1 cm). MS, Murashige and Skoog

Table 2 Effect of sucrose in Murashige and Skoog basal medium on the in vitro flowering of roses after 60 d of culture

Sucrose (mg/L)Shoot height (cm)Fresh weight (mg)Dry weight (mg)Flowering (%)
Control1.66 ± 0.11c121.17 ± 0.85b9.50 ± 0.22c-
403.35 ± 0.22a150.08 ± 1.06a14.93 ± 0.32a53.33 ± 8.01a
503.29 ± 0.16a149.66 ± 4.10a15.14 ± 0.34a51.48 ± 7.88a
602.49 ± 0.08b147.43 ± 2.06a14.25 ± 0.29b26.67 ±11.55b

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test).



Effects of cytokinin on in vitro flowering

When treated with different concentrations of BA, the shoot height reached the highest value at a BA concentration of 1.0 mg/L (2.93 cm) (Fig. 2B), while the fresh weight and dry weight gradually increased with increasing BA concentration. The treatment with BA 1.0 and 1.5 mg/L resulted in the highest flowering rate (45.18 and 38.15%, respectively), whereas no flowers were formed in the control experiment (Table 3). Increasing BA concentration enhances flower size and improves color in the culture medium (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Effects of cytokinin on in vitro flowering after 60 d of culture in Murashige and Skoog medium. Treatment with (A) 0.5 mg/L BA, (B) 1.0 mg/L BA, (C) 1.5 mg/L BA, and (D) 2.0 mg/L BA (scale bar = 1 cm). BA, 6-benzyladenine

Table 3 Effect of BA in Murashige and Skoog basal medium containing 30 g/L sucrose on the in vitro flowering of rose after 60 d of culture

BA (mg/L)Shoot height (cm)Fresh weight (mg)Dry weight (mg)Flowering (%)
Control1.65 ± 0.10c121.17 ± 0.85e9.50 ± 0.22e-
0.52.20 ± 0.14b135.06 ± 2.50d11.30 ± 0.21d13.70 ± 5.48b
1.02.93 ± 0.15a142.23 ± 1.41c12.38 ± 0.34c45.18 ± 8.98a
1.52.07 ± 0.12b156.25 ± 3.79b14.14 ± 0.51b38.15 ± 7.40a
2.01.63 ± 0.19c187.71 ± 1.97a17.90 ± 0.76a18.70 ± 7.04b

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test).

BA, 6-benzyladenine.



Effects of AgNO3 on in vitro flowering

When treated with AgNO3 1.0 mg/L, the shoot height (3.06 cm), fresh weight (147.25 mg), dry weight (13.66 mg), and flowering percentage reached their highest values (56.67%). Treatment with AgNO3 at 1.5 mg/L resulted in a lower flowering rate of 18.52% compared to the 1.0 mg/L treatment (Table 4). In contrast, the culture medium containing AgNO3 at a concentration of 0.5 mg/L yielded the lowest flowering rate at 17.04%. Higher concentrations of AgNO3 are associated with the development of larger and more vibrant flowers in the culture medium (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Effect of AgNO3 on in vitro flowering after 60 d of culture in Murashige and Skoog medium. Treatment with (A) 0.5 mg/L AgNO3, (B) 1.0 mg/L AgNO3, (C) 1.5 mg/L AgNO3, and (D) 2.0 mg/L AgNO3 (scale bar = 1 cm). AgNO3, silver nitrate

Table 4 Effect of AgNO3 in Murashige and Skoog basal medium containing 30 g/L sucrose on in vitro flowering of rose after 60 d of culture

AgNO3 (mg/L)Shoot height (cm)Fresh weight (mg)Dry weight (mg)Flowering (%)
01.65 ± 0.10d121.17 ± 0.85d9.50 ± 0.22c-
0.52.37 ± 0.10b128.06 ± 2.50c10.91 ± 0.18b17.04 ± 5.13c
13.06 ± 0.11a147.25 ± 3.58ab13.66 ± 0.49a56.67 ± 5.77a
1.52.49 ± 0.08b143.23 ± 2.51b13.15 ± 0.39a38.15 ± 7.40b
2.02.10 ± 0.14c149.44 ± 4.44a13.27 ± 0.36a18.33 ± 7.64c

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test).

AgNO3, silver nitrate.



Effects of sucrose, BA, and AgNO3 on in vitro flowering

In all treatments containing sucrose, BA, and AgNO3 in the culture medium, flowering occurred. When BA concentrations were varied, BA 1.0 mg/L gave the highest shoot height (3.49 cm) and flowering percentage (60.74%). The dry weight and fresh weight increased with higher BA concentrations, with BA 2.0 mg/L recorded at 192.44 mg/L for fresh weight and 18.90 mg/L for dry weight. The lowest flowering percentage was at BA 2.0 mg/L (26.67%) (Table 5). In addition to flower formation in the culture media, root formation was observed in all media when treated in combination, except for the BA concentration of 0.5 mg/L (Fig. 4)

Fig. 4. In vitro flowering in MS medium containing 40 g/L sucrose, 1.0 mg/L silver nitrate, and cytokinin at different concentrations. (A) Small flower bud in MS medium without BA. (B) Small flower bud with roots in MS medium containing 0.5 mg/L BA. (C) Flower bud with roots in MS medium containing 1.0 mg/L BA. (D) Flower bud with roots in MS medium containing 1.5 mg/L BA. (E) Flower bud with roots in MS medium containing 2.0 mg/L BA (Scale bar = 1 cm). MS, Murashige and Skoog; BA, 6-benzyladenine

Table 5 Effect of BA in Murashige and Skoog basal medium containing 1.0 mg/L AgNO3 and 40 g/L sucrose on the in vitro flowering of rose after 60 d of culture

TreatmentShoot height (cm)Fresh weight (mg)Dry weight (mg)Flowering (%)
Sucrose (g/L)AgNO3 (mg/L)BA (mg/L)
401.001.90 ± 0.10c134.77 ± 1.90e11.07 ± 0.22d41.10 ± 8.40b
0.52.58 ± 0.11b141.06 ± 2.50d12.21 ± 0.18c44.81 ± 5.01b
1.03.49 ± 0.16a162.92 ± 2.97c15.68 ± 0.63b60.74 ± 5.60a
1.52.69 ± 0.08b156.23 ± 2.51b15.92 ± 0.16b44.81 ± 5.01b
2.01.71 ± 0.08c192.44 ± 4.44a18.90 ± 0.49a26.67 ± 2.89c

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test).

BA, 6-benzyladenine; AgNO3, silver nitrate.


In tissue culture systems, sugar plays two primary roles: as an energy source (Gago et al. 2014; Lavie et al. 2024) and as a signal for flower induction (Yoon et al. 2020). Carbohydrates are essential for floral meristem production. Raising the levels of endogenous sucrose also promotes flowering in Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) (Micallef et al. 1995). Applying 50 mM sucrose to the leaves of Floral Yuuka induces flowering when plants are grown under short-day conditions (Sun et al. 2017). In species like Sinapis alba, Rudbeckia bicolor, Perilla nankinensis, and Xanthium strumarium, sucrose levels in the phloem sap and shoot apical meristem rise before floral induction (Bodson and Outlaw 1985; Yoon et al. 2020). Sucrose addition induces flowering in Brassica campestris grown in vitro, especially under low light (Friend et al. 1984). In this study, treatments with 40 and 50 g/L sucrose concentrations resulted in high flowering rates and good flower quality. Our findings show that sucrose significantly impacted growth and in vitro flowering. This suggests that increased sugar flow to the shoot apical meristems before flowering may regulate floral induction. However, at a concentration of 50 g/L and 60 g/L, flower buds began to wilt due to the excessive sugar levels (Fig. 1).

Plant growth regulators have a significant impact on morphogenesis in vitro. Cytokinins are known to stimulate cell division and work alongside other hormones to regulate various biochemical, physiological, and morphological processes in plants (Hallmark and Rashotte 2019; Nowakowska et al. 2022). Cytokinin is an important component of the flowering induction medium, which can promote in vitro flowering in several rose cultivars (Saritha and Naidu 2007; Vu et al. 2006; Zeng et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2007). According to Yuan et al. (2024), adding hormones, sugars, and nutrients to the culture medium improved the flowering of roses in vitro, with cytokinin having the strongest effect. At 1.5 mg/L, floral bud induction and flowering rates reached 91.11% and 79.73%, respectively (Yuan et al. 2024). In this study, MS medium supplemented with different concentrations of BA was shown to induce in vitro flowering compared to the control. When the concentration of BA increased to 2.0 mg/L, the plant's ability to stimulate flowering decreased, but the number of shoots on the medium increased, leading to an increase in plant weight (Fig. 2). Therefore, when BA concentration increases, it will stimulate more shoot formation instead of flower development on the main stem. According to the results from Table 3, 1.0 and 1.5 mg/L BA treatment gave the highest flowering rate. Additionally, flower formation in the culture encountered some unusual problems, including issues with shape, number of petals, and flower color (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5. Main flower abnormalities observed during in vitro flower induction. (A) The flower bud is a small green-petal rose. (B) Leaves have developed into flowers. (C) Undeveloped petals (Scale bar = 1 cm)

Applying silver ions as AgNO3 in plant tissue culture media significantly regulates ethylene activity in various plant systems. Silver nitrate has significant physiological effects in plants, including organogenesis, somatic embryogenesis, in vitro rooting of micro shoots, and control of flowering and leaf abscission. Another study also showed that the accumulation of ethylene gas was significantly reduced when AgNO3 was used as an inhibitor in the micropropagation of cherry (Sarropoulou et al. 2016). Applying silver ions in the form of AgNO3 to the plant tissue culture medium has been shown to reduce ethylene activity and induce flowering in rose buds. According to Matos et al. (2021), a concentration of 2.0 mg/L of AgNO3 resulted in a flowering rate of 50%. In this paper, however, a concentration of 1.0 mg/L of AgNO3 produced the highest flowering rate at 56.67%. Conversely, higher concentrations of AgNO3 led to abnormal flowering in rose buds due to the accumulation of excessive silver ions in the plant tissue, similar to findings in a study on tobacco (Cardoso et al. 2019). When treated together, cytokinin, AgNO3, and sucrose induced flowering in rose varieties. Cytokinins stimulated the flowering induction process, and Ag+ ion reduced the sensitivity of rose buds to ethylene under in vitro conditions, leading to the induction of flowering. In addition, sucrose is considered an essential carbon source in the culture medium for flower induction and development. Besides sucrose, hormones can also play a role in increasing the number of flowers. Cytokinins can impact meristem size, enhancing flower production (Han et al. 2014). Additionally, cytokinins are facilitative in tissue culture transitioning from vegetative to floral meristems (Taylor et al. 2005).

However, research results on PGRs and AgNO3 are still quite limited, especially in overcoming the abnormal phenomenon of roses cultured in vitro. In this study, BA, sucrose, and AgNO3 were added separately or in combination to the culture medium to increase growth and improve flowering ability in vitro, overcoming the abnormal phenomenon of increasing flower quality. This result can enhance the understanding of flowering physiology in rose species and help improve flowering induction.

This research is funded by University of Science, VNU-HCM under grant number T2024-41.

  1. Bodson M, Outlaw WH (1985) Elevation in the Sucrose Content of the Shoot Apical Meristem of Sinapis alba at Floral Evocation. Plant Physiol 420-424. doi.org/10.1104/pp.79.2.420
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Cardoso JC (2019) Silver nitrate enhances in vitro development and quality of shoots of Anthurium andraeanum. Sci Hortic 253:358-363. doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.04.054
    CrossRef
  3. Friend DJ, Bodson M, Bernier G (1984) Promotion of Flowering in Brassica campestris L. Cv Ceres by Sucrose. Plant Physiol 75(4). doi.org/10.1104/pp.75.4.1085
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Gago J, Martínez-Núñez L, Landín M, Flexas J, Gallego PP (2014) Modeling the Effects of Light and Sucrose on In Vitro Propagated Plants: A Multiscale System Analysis Using Artificial Intelligence Technology. PLOS ONE 9(1):e85989. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085989
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef DOAJ
  5. Hallmark HT, Rashotte AM (2019) Review - Cytokinin Response Factors: Responding to more than cytokinin. Plant Sci 289:110251. doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110251
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Han Y, Yang H, Jiao Y (2014) Regulation of inflorescence architecture by cytokinins. Front Plant Sci 5:119758. doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00669
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef DOAJ
  7. Kumar V, Parvatam G, Ravishankar GA (2009) AgNO3: a poten- tial regulator of ethylene activity and plant growth modulator. Electron J Biotechnol 12(2):1-15. doi.org/10.2225/vol12-issue2-fulltext-1
    CrossRef
  8. Lavie O, Buxdorf K, Eshed Williams L (2024) Optimizing cannabis cultivation: an efficient in vitro system for flowering induction. Plant Methods 20(1):141. doi.org/10.1186/s13007-024-01265-5
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef DOAJ
  9. Leus L, Laere KV, Riek JD, Huylenbroeck JV (2018) Rose (Chapter 27). In: Ornamental Crops: Handbook of Plant Breeding. Springer, Switzerland 11:719-767
    CrossRef
  10. Matos AVC, Oliveira BS, Oliveira M, Cardoso JC (2021) AgNO3 improved micropropagation and stimulate in vitro flowering of rose (Rosa x hybrida) cv. Sena. Ornam Hortic 27(1):33-40. doi.org/10.1590/2447-536X.v27i1.2161
    CrossRef
  11. Micallef BJ, Haskins KA, Vanderveer PJ (1995) Altered photosynthesis, flowering, and fruiting in transgenic tomato plants that have an increased capacity for sucrose synthesis. Planta 327-334. doi.org/10.1007/BF00201392
    CrossRef
  12. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15(3):473-497. doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb080 52.x
    CrossRef
  13. Nguyen NH, Van LB (2020) A simple, economical, and high efficient protocol to produce in vitro miniature rose. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 56:362-365. doi.org/10.1007/s11627-019-10043-1
    CrossRef
  14. Nowakowska K, Pińkowska A, Siedlecka E (2022) The effect of cytokinins on shoot proliferation, biochemical changes and genetic stability of Rhododendron 'Kazimierz Odnowiciel' in the in vitro cultures. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 149:675-684. doi.org/10.1007/s11240-021-02206-z
    CrossRef
  15. Saritha K, Naidu C (2007) In vitro flowering of Withania somnifera Dunal. -An important antitumor medicinal plant. Plant Sci 172(4):847-851. doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.12.016
    CrossRef
  16. Sarropoulou V, Dimassi-Theriou K, Therios I (2016) Efect of the ethylene inhibitors silver nitrate, silver sulfate, and cobalt chloride on micropropagation and biochemical parameters in the cherry rootstocks CAB-6P and Gisela 6. Turk J Biol 670-683. doi.org/10.3906/biy-1505-92
    CrossRef
  17. Sreelekshmi R, Siril E (2021) Investigation on in vitro bouquets and flower longevity of micropropagated Dianthus chinensis L. Sci Hortic 275:109708. doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109708
    CrossRef
  18. Sun J, Wang H, Ren L, Chen S, Chen F, Jiang J (2017) CmFTL2 is involved in the photoperiod- and sucrose-mediated control of flowering time in chrysanthemum. Hortic Res 1-6. doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2017.1
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Taylor NJ, Light ME, Staden JV (2005) In vitro flowering of Kniphofia leucocephala: influence of cytokinins. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 83:327-333. doi.org/10.1007/s11240-005-8429-8
    CrossRef
  20. Tee CS, Maziah M, Tan CS (2008) Induction of in vitro flowering in the orchid Dendrobium Sonia 17. Biologia Plantarum 723-726. doi.org/10.1007/s10535-008-0139-8
    CrossRef
  21. Vu NH, Anh PH, Nhut DT (2006) The role of sucrose and different cytokinins in the in vitro floral morphogenesis of rose (hybrid tea) cv. "First Prize". Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 315-320. doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9089-z
    CrossRef
  22. Wang GY, Yuan MF, Hong Y (2002) In vitro flower induction in roses. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol -Plant 513-518. doi.org/10.1079/IVP2002340
    CrossRef
  23. Wingler A (2018) Transitioning to the Next Phase: The Role of Sugar Signaling throughout the Plant Life Cycle. Plant Physiol 176(2):1075-1084. doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01229
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Yoon J, Cho L, Tun W, Jeon J, An G (2020) Sucrose signaling in higher plants Plant Sci. doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110703
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Yuan M, Weng S, Ma Y (2024) Study on physiological and biochemical characteristics during in vitro flowering of Rosa 'Yametsu-Hime' Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. doi.org/10.1007/s11240-024-02731-7
    CrossRef
  26. Zeng S, Liang S, Zhang YY (2013) In vitro flowering red miniature rose. Biol Plant 57:401-409. doi.org/10.1007/s10535-013-0306-4
    CrossRef DOAJ
  27. Zhang T (2007) In vitro flowering of Perilla frutescens In vitro Cell Dev- Pl. 43:91-94
    CrossRef
  28. Zhang Z, Leung DW (2000) A comparison of in vitro with in vivo flowering in Gentian. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 223-226
    CrossRef

Article

Research Article

J Plant Biotechnol 2025; 52(1): 9-15

Published online February 5, 2025 https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2025.52.002.009

Copyright © The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology.

Effect of plant growth regulators, sucrose, and silver nitrate on in vitro rose flowering

Linh Minh Hong Tran

Department of Plant Physiology, University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Correspondence to:M. H. T. Linh (✉)
e-mail: tmhlinh@hcmus.edu.vn

Received: 28 October 2024; Revised: 10 December 2024; Accepted: 26 December 2024; Published: 5 February 2025.

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Rosa hybrida (rose) is one of the most widely used species in the cut flower industry worldwide. Therefore, the micropropagation of R. hybrida L. has been extensively studied. However, studies that focus on the in vitro flowering of roses are scarce. In this study, various concentrations of 6-benzyladenine (BA) were used to promote shoot multiplication from rose stem nodes. A concentration of 0.5 mg/L of BA yielded the greatest shoot height and was then used in subsequent flowering experiments. Sucrose, BA, and silver nitrate (AgNO3) were used individually or in combination to supplement Murashige and Skoog medium for flowering experiments from shoots. The shoot height, fresh weight, dry weight, and flowering percentage were recorded after treatments. The rate of flowering was the highest (60.74%) when 1.0 mg/L BA, 1.0 mg/L AgNO3, and 40 g/L sucrose were added to the culture medium. Additionally, abnormal flowers in small shapes and unusual colors were observed. Flowering was also observed in treatments with higher concentrations; however, the flowers developed more abnormally.

Keywords: Abnormal flower, Rosa hybrida, Cytokinins, in vitro flower, Sucrose, AgNO3

Introduction

Roses, with their vibrant colors, delicate petals, and captivating fragrances, have remained a beloved choice for ornamental purposes across various cultures and regions worldwide for hundreds of years. Rose is a significant commercial ornamental crop of the Rosa genus, which belongs to the subfamily Rosoideae in the Rosaceae family (Leus et al. 2018). In vitro flowering refers to the process of inducing and studying the flowering of plants in a controlled laboratory environment, rather than in their natural habitat. This method provides researchers with a valuable tool for dissecting the intricate processes involved in plant flowering, such as the transition from vegetative growth to reproductive growth, the development of floral structures, and senescence (Nguyen and Van 2020). By examining these phenomena in a controlled setting, scientists can understand the genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors that influence plant flowering, ultimately contributing to advancements in agriculture, horticulture, and plant biology. Many previous studies have demonstrated that the addition of auxin and cytokinin to the culture medium increases the flowering rate (Vu et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2002, Zeng et al. 2013) using a sucrose concentration of 50 g/L, 3.0 mg/L BA, and 0.1 mg/L NAA, resulting in a 68.33% in vitro flowering shoot percentage (Zeng et al. 2013). Other studies focused on obtaining the highest percentage of flowering on MS medium supplemented with 3.0 mg/L BA, 0.1 mg/L NAA, and 30 g/L sucrose (Vu et al. 2006). At a concentration of 2.0 mg/L, AgNO3 effectively induced 50% of rose shoots to undergo in vitro flowering. After this, higher concentrations also exhibited induction of flowering, albeit accompanied by imperfect flower development (Matos et al. 2021). The preceding in vitro flowering studies in ornamental plants, such as Dendrobium Sonia 17 (Tee et al. 2008), Gentiana species (Zhang and Leung 2000), and Rosa species (Zeng et al. 2013), indicate that the various cytokinins investigated, BA demonstrates significant potential as an inducer of in vitro floral buds (Sreelekshmi and Siril 2021).

In vitro flowering studies have many limitations such as ethylene biosynthesis, causing leaf drop and yellowing... Therefore,

chemical inhibitors of ethylene action can be used in the culture medium to reduce these symptoms. Silver (Ag) is added to culture media to prevent bacterial contamination and to address abnormalities during micropropagation. The Ag+ ions found in silver nitrate (AgNO3) and silver thiosulfate (Ag2SO4) are typically incorporated into culture media. The ethylene receptor (ETR1) has a binding site for copper ions (Cu2+) that is crucial for ethylene signaling. When Cu2+ is replaced with Ag+, it blocks the receptor and inhibits the ethylene signals in plants (Kumar et al. 2009). Sugars produced through photosynthesis regulate essential biological processes during growth and development, such as flowering time, initiation of senescence, embryogenesis, seed germination, seedling growth, and tuber formation (Wingler et al. 2018; Yoon et al. 2020). Sucrose plays a crucial role in governing various developmental and metabolic processes in plants. In some other reports, the role of sucrose in the in vitro flowering process was also studied. For example, Vu et al. (2006) showed that a sucrose concentration of 45 g/L gave the highest flowering rate of 33.3% (Zeng et al. 2013), Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) containg 50 g/L sucrose resulted in a higher in vitro flowering rate than medium with other sucrose concentrations (Saritha and Naidu 2007).

Changes in medium composition, plant growth regulators (PGRs), or changes in culture medium can accelerate growth, shorten the vegetative period, and lead to early flowering. Additional research is required to understand better these phenomena related to the physiology of flowering. This study aimed to determine the role of some factors, such as sugar, PGRs, and AgNO3, in the in vitro flowering process of Rosa hybrida L.

Materials and Methods

Selection of explant material

The nodal explants, approximately 1.5 cm long and containing one axillary bud, were selected from the mid-stem region of 3-month-old stems in Da Lat Hasfarm Company (VietNam). The explants were initially washed under running tap water, followed by a rinse with 70% ethanol for 30 seconds, then rinsed in sterile distilled water. Next, the explants were sterilized for 3 minutes with 0.2% mercuric chloride (HgCl2). After each treatment, the explants were gently washed with sterile distilled water 3-4 times.

Experimental design

Establishment and shoot multiplication stages. Surface sterilized nodal explants (about 0.5 cm in length) were individually cultured on MS medium with BA (0.0, 0.5; 1.0, 1.5 mg/L) and 30 g/L sucrose.

Floral induction media

After 30 days in culture, the axillary buds were transferred to flower media. Individual shoots (2-3 cm in height) were collected from the shoot multiplication medium, which was found to be the most suitable for in vitro flowering based on preliminary experiments. Shoots were transferred to MS media that included individual plant growth regulators such as BA (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 mg/L), sucrose (30, 40, 50, 60 g/L), AgNO3 (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 mg/L), or a combination of BA, sucrose, and AgNO3. The MS medium was selected as the base (control) establishment medium from which various modifications were made. The culture medium was adjusted to a pH of 5.8 before autoclaving at 121°C and 1 atm for 20 minutes. Cultures containing explants per tube were incubated at 22 ± 1°C, the humidity 55-60%, in a controlled growth chamber under a 12-hour photoperiod with a light intensity of 3000 lux. Data were recorded on the number of shoots (shoots/explant), shoot height (cm), fresh weight (mg), dry weight (mg), and flowering percentage (%) after 60 days of culture.

Data analysis

All experiments were set up using a completely randomized design and were repeated three times. Each treatment consisted of three replicates, with 10 tubes per replicate. The data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 for Windows, with a one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) to determine significant differences between means at P ≤ 0.05.

Results

Effects of BA in MS culture on in vitro multiplication of rose

When treated with different concentrations of BA, the number of shoots gradually increased with concentration, reaching the highest at BA concentrations of 1.0 and 1.5 mg/L. The tallest shoot height was at BA concentration of 0.5 (2.02 cm), then gradually decreased at BA concentrations of 1.0 and 1.5 mg/L (1.83 and 1.31cm, respectively). In contrast, the shoot multiplication rate at BA concentrations of 1.0 and 1.5 was highest after 30 days of culture. Table 1 shows that BA at a concentration of 0.5 mg/L resulted in the highest shoot height and a high shoot multiplication rate. Therefore, BA was used at a concentration of 0.5 for the flowering experiments.

Table 1 . Effect of BA in Murashige and Skoog basal medium containing 30 g/L sucrose on the in vitro multiplication of rose after 30 d of culture.

BA (mg/L)Shoot height (cm)Multiplication ratio
Control1.50 ± 0.07c1.78 ± 0.38c
0.52.02 ± 0.10a2.44 ± 0.38b
1.01.83 ± 0.09b3.44 ± 0.19a
1.51.31 ± 0.10d3.67 ± 0.33a

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test)..

BA, 6-benzyladenine..



Effects of sucrose on in vitro flowering

The concentration of sucrose significantly affected in vitro flowering, as shown in Table 2. Medium MS supplemented with 40 and 50 g/L sucrose produced the tallest shoot height and the highest dry weight. The fresh weight also increased with sucrose treatment compared to the control group. The highest flowering rates were observed at sucrose concentrations of 40 and 50 g/L, which were 53.33% and 51.48%, respectively. However, at sucrose concentrations of 50 and 60 g/L, wilting of leaves and flowers at the shoot occurred (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Effect of sucrose on in vitro flowering after 60 d of culture in MS medium. (A) MS medium with no flower buds. (B) In vitro flowering in MS medium containing 40 g/L sucrose. (C) Flower buds with wilted leaves in MS medium supplemented with 50 g/L sucrose. (D) Wilted flower buds and leaves in MS medium supplemented with 60 g/L sucrose. (Scale bar = 1 cm). MS, Murashige and Skoog

Table 2 . Effect of sucrose in Murashige and Skoog basal medium on the in vitro flowering of roses after 60 d of culture.

Sucrose (mg/L)Shoot height (cm)Fresh weight (mg)Dry weight (mg)Flowering (%)
Control1.66 ± 0.11c121.17 ± 0.85b9.50 ± 0.22c-
403.35 ± 0.22a150.08 ± 1.06a14.93 ± 0.32a53.33 ± 8.01a
503.29 ± 0.16a149.66 ± 4.10a15.14 ± 0.34a51.48 ± 7.88a
602.49 ± 0.08b147.43 ± 2.06a14.25 ± 0.29b26.67 ±11.55b

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test)..



Effects of cytokinin on in vitro flowering

When treated with different concentrations of BA, the shoot height reached the highest value at a BA concentration of 1.0 mg/L (2.93 cm) (Fig. 2B), while the fresh weight and dry weight gradually increased with increasing BA concentration. The treatment with BA 1.0 and 1.5 mg/L resulted in the highest flowering rate (45.18 and 38.15%, respectively), whereas no flowers were formed in the control experiment (Table 3). Increasing BA concentration enhances flower size and improves color in the culture medium (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Effects of cytokinin on in vitro flowering after 60 d of culture in Murashige and Skoog medium. Treatment with (A) 0.5 mg/L BA, (B) 1.0 mg/L BA, (C) 1.5 mg/L BA, and (D) 2.0 mg/L BA (scale bar = 1 cm). BA, 6-benzyladenine

Table 3 . Effect of BA in Murashige and Skoog basal medium containing 30 g/L sucrose on the in vitro flowering of rose after 60 d of culture.

BA (mg/L)Shoot height (cm)Fresh weight (mg)Dry weight (mg)Flowering (%)
Control1.65 ± 0.10c121.17 ± 0.85e9.50 ± 0.22e-
0.52.20 ± 0.14b135.06 ± 2.50d11.30 ± 0.21d13.70 ± 5.48b
1.02.93 ± 0.15a142.23 ± 1.41c12.38 ± 0.34c45.18 ± 8.98a
1.52.07 ± 0.12b156.25 ± 3.79b14.14 ± 0.51b38.15 ± 7.40a
2.01.63 ± 0.19c187.71 ± 1.97a17.90 ± 0.76a18.70 ± 7.04b

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test)..

BA, 6-benzyladenine..



Effects of AgNO3 on in vitro flowering

When treated with AgNO3 1.0 mg/L, the shoot height (3.06 cm), fresh weight (147.25 mg), dry weight (13.66 mg), and flowering percentage reached their highest values (56.67%). Treatment with AgNO3 at 1.5 mg/L resulted in a lower flowering rate of 18.52% compared to the 1.0 mg/L treatment (Table 4). In contrast, the culture medium containing AgNO3 at a concentration of 0.5 mg/L yielded the lowest flowering rate at 17.04%. Higher concentrations of AgNO3 are associated with the development of larger and more vibrant flowers in the culture medium (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Effect of AgNO3 on in vitro flowering after 60 d of culture in Murashige and Skoog medium. Treatment with (A) 0.5 mg/L AgNO3, (B) 1.0 mg/L AgNO3, (C) 1.5 mg/L AgNO3, and (D) 2.0 mg/L AgNO3 (scale bar = 1 cm). AgNO3, silver nitrate

Table 4 . Effect of AgNO3 in Murashige and Skoog basal medium containing 30 g/L sucrose on in vitro flowering of rose after 60 d of culture.

AgNO3 (mg/L)Shoot height (cm)Fresh weight (mg)Dry weight (mg)Flowering (%)
01.65 ± 0.10d121.17 ± 0.85d9.50 ± 0.22c-
0.52.37 ± 0.10b128.06 ± 2.50c10.91 ± 0.18b17.04 ± 5.13c
13.06 ± 0.11a147.25 ± 3.58ab13.66 ± 0.49a56.67 ± 5.77a
1.52.49 ± 0.08b143.23 ± 2.51b13.15 ± 0.39a38.15 ± 7.40b
2.02.10 ± 0.14c149.44 ± 4.44a13.27 ± 0.36a18.33 ± 7.64c

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test)..

AgNO3, silver nitrate..



Effects of sucrose, BA, and AgNO3 on in vitro flowering

In all treatments containing sucrose, BA, and AgNO3 in the culture medium, flowering occurred. When BA concentrations were varied, BA 1.0 mg/L gave the highest shoot height (3.49 cm) and flowering percentage (60.74%). The dry weight and fresh weight increased with higher BA concentrations, with BA 2.0 mg/L recorded at 192.44 mg/L for fresh weight and 18.90 mg/L for dry weight. The lowest flowering percentage was at BA 2.0 mg/L (26.67%) (Table 5). In addition to flower formation in the culture media, root formation was observed in all media when treated in combination, except for the BA concentration of 0.5 mg/L (Fig. 4)

Figure 4. In vitro flowering in MS medium containing 40 g/L sucrose, 1.0 mg/L silver nitrate, and cytokinin at different concentrations. (A) Small flower bud in MS medium without BA. (B) Small flower bud with roots in MS medium containing 0.5 mg/L BA. (C) Flower bud with roots in MS medium containing 1.0 mg/L BA. (D) Flower bud with roots in MS medium containing 1.5 mg/L BA. (E) Flower bud with roots in MS medium containing 2.0 mg/L BA (Scale bar = 1 cm). MS, Murashige and Skoog; BA, 6-benzyladenine

Table 5 . Effect of BA in Murashige and Skoog basal medium containing 1.0 mg/L AgNO3 and 40 g/L sucrose on the in vitro flowering of rose after 60 d of culture.

TreatmentShoot height (cm)Fresh weight (mg)Dry weight (mg)Flowering (%)
Sucrose (g/L)AgNO3 (mg/L)BA (mg/L)
401.001.90 ± 0.10c134.77 ± 1.90e11.07 ± 0.22d41.10 ± 8.40b
0.52.58 ± 0.11b141.06 ± 2.50d12.21 ± 0.18c44.81 ± 5.01b
1.03.49 ± 0.16a162.92 ± 2.97c15.68 ± 0.63b60.74 ± 5.60a
1.52.69 ± 0.08b156.23 ± 2.51b15.92 ± 0.16b44.81 ± 5.01b
2.01.71 ± 0.08c192.44 ± 4.44a18.90 ± 0.49a26.67 ± 2.89c

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test)..

BA, 6-benzyladenine; AgNO3, silver nitrate..


Discussion

In tissue culture systems, sugar plays two primary roles: as an energy source (Gago et al. 2014; Lavie et al. 2024) and as a signal for flower induction (Yoon et al. 2020). Carbohydrates are essential for floral meristem production. Raising the levels of endogenous sucrose also promotes flowering in Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) (Micallef et al. 1995). Applying 50 mM sucrose to the leaves of Floral Yuuka induces flowering when plants are grown under short-day conditions (Sun et al. 2017). In species like Sinapis alba, Rudbeckia bicolor, Perilla nankinensis, and Xanthium strumarium, sucrose levels in the phloem sap and shoot apical meristem rise before floral induction (Bodson and Outlaw 1985; Yoon et al. 2020). Sucrose addition induces flowering in Brassica campestris grown in vitro, especially under low light (Friend et al. 1984). In this study, treatments with 40 and 50 g/L sucrose concentrations resulted in high flowering rates and good flower quality. Our findings show that sucrose significantly impacted growth and in vitro flowering. This suggests that increased sugar flow to the shoot apical meristems before flowering may regulate floral induction. However, at a concentration of 50 g/L and 60 g/L, flower buds began to wilt due to the excessive sugar levels (Fig. 1).

Plant growth regulators have a significant impact on morphogenesis in vitro. Cytokinins are known to stimulate cell division and work alongside other hormones to regulate various biochemical, physiological, and morphological processes in plants (Hallmark and Rashotte 2019; Nowakowska et al. 2022). Cytokinin is an important component of the flowering induction medium, which can promote in vitro flowering in several rose cultivars (Saritha and Naidu 2007; Vu et al. 2006; Zeng et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2007). According to Yuan et al. (2024), adding hormones, sugars, and nutrients to the culture medium improved the flowering of roses in vitro, with cytokinin having the strongest effect. At 1.5 mg/L, floral bud induction and flowering rates reached 91.11% and 79.73%, respectively (Yuan et al. 2024). In this study, MS medium supplemented with different concentrations of BA was shown to induce in vitro flowering compared to the control. When the concentration of BA increased to 2.0 mg/L, the plant's ability to stimulate flowering decreased, but the number of shoots on the medium increased, leading to an increase in plant weight (Fig. 2). Therefore, when BA concentration increases, it will stimulate more shoot formation instead of flower development on the main stem. According to the results from Table 3, 1.0 and 1.5 mg/L BA treatment gave the highest flowering rate. Additionally, flower formation in the culture encountered some unusual problems, including issues with shape, number of petals, and flower color (Fig. 5).

Figure 5. Main flower abnormalities observed during in vitro flower induction. (A) The flower bud is a small green-petal rose. (B) Leaves have developed into flowers. (C) Undeveloped petals (Scale bar = 1 cm)

Applying silver ions as AgNO3 in plant tissue culture media significantly regulates ethylene activity in various plant systems. Silver nitrate has significant physiological effects in plants, including organogenesis, somatic embryogenesis, in vitro rooting of micro shoots, and control of flowering and leaf abscission. Another study also showed that the accumulation of ethylene gas was significantly reduced when AgNO3 was used as an inhibitor in the micropropagation of cherry (Sarropoulou et al. 2016). Applying silver ions in the form of AgNO3 to the plant tissue culture medium has been shown to reduce ethylene activity and induce flowering in rose buds. According to Matos et al. (2021), a concentration of 2.0 mg/L of AgNO3 resulted in a flowering rate of 50%. In this paper, however, a concentration of 1.0 mg/L of AgNO3 produced the highest flowering rate at 56.67%. Conversely, higher concentrations of AgNO3 led to abnormal flowering in rose buds due to the accumulation of excessive silver ions in the plant tissue, similar to findings in a study on tobacco (Cardoso et al. 2019). When treated together, cytokinin, AgNO3, and sucrose induced flowering in rose varieties. Cytokinins stimulated the flowering induction process, and Ag+ ion reduced the sensitivity of rose buds to ethylene under in vitro conditions, leading to the induction of flowering. In addition, sucrose is considered an essential carbon source in the culture medium for flower induction and development. Besides sucrose, hormones can also play a role in increasing the number of flowers. Cytokinins can impact meristem size, enhancing flower production (Han et al. 2014). Additionally, cytokinins are facilitative in tissue culture transitioning from vegetative to floral meristems (Taylor et al. 2005).

However, research results on PGRs and AgNO3 are still quite limited, especially in overcoming the abnormal phenomenon of roses cultured in vitro. In this study, BA, sucrose, and AgNO3 were added separately or in combination to the culture medium to increase growth and improve flowering ability in vitro, overcoming the abnormal phenomenon of increasing flower quality. This result can enhance the understanding of flowering physiology in rose species and help improve flowering induction.

Acknowledgement

This research is funded by University of Science, VNU-HCM under grant number T2024-41.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Effect of sucrose on in vitro flowering after 60 d of culture in MS medium. (A) MS medium with no flower buds. (B) In vitro flowering in MS medium containing 40 g/L sucrose. (C) Flower buds with wilted leaves in MS medium supplemented with 50 g/L sucrose. (D) Wilted flower buds and leaves in MS medium supplemented with 60 g/L sucrose. (Scale bar = 1 cm). MS, Murashige and Skoog
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2025; 52: 9-15https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2025.52.002.009

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Effects of cytokinin on in vitro flowering after 60 d of culture in Murashige and Skoog medium. Treatment with (A) 0.5 mg/L BA, (B) 1.0 mg/L BA, (C) 1.5 mg/L BA, and (D) 2.0 mg/L BA (scale bar = 1 cm). BA, 6-benzyladenine
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2025; 52: 9-15https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2025.52.002.009

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Effect of AgNO3 on in vitro flowering after 60 d of culture in Murashige and Skoog medium. Treatment with (A) 0.5 mg/L AgNO3, (B) 1.0 mg/L AgNO3, (C) 1.5 mg/L AgNO3, and (D) 2.0 mg/L AgNO3 (scale bar = 1 cm). AgNO3, silver nitrate
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2025; 52: 9-15https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2025.52.002.009

Fig 4.

Figure 4.In vitro flowering in MS medium containing 40 g/L sucrose, 1.0 mg/L silver nitrate, and cytokinin at different concentrations. (A) Small flower bud in MS medium without BA. (B) Small flower bud with roots in MS medium containing 0.5 mg/L BA. (C) Flower bud with roots in MS medium containing 1.0 mg/L BA. (D) Flower bud with roots in MS medium containing 1.5 mg/L BA. (E) Flower bud with roots in MS medium containing 2.0 mg/L BA (Scale bar = 1 cm). MS, Murashige and Skoog; BA, 6-benzyladenine
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2025; 52: 9-15https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2025.52.002.009

Fig 5.

Figure 5.Main flower abnormalities observed during in vitro flower induction. (A) The flower bud is a small green-petal rose. (B) Leaves have developed into flowers. (C) Undeveloped petals (Scale bar = 1 cm)
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2025; 52: 9-15https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2025.52.002.009

Table 1 . Effect of BA in Murashige and Skoog basal medium containing 30 g/L sucrose on the in vitro multiplication of rose after 30 d of culture.

BA (mg/L)Shoot height (cm)Multiplication ratio
Control1.50 ± 0.07c1.78 ± 0.38c
0.52.02 ± 0.10a2.44 ± 0.38b
1.01.83 ± 0.09b3.44 ± 0.19a
1.51.31 ± 0.10d3.67 ± 0.33a

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test)..

BA, 6-benzyladenine..


Table 2 . Effect of sucrose in Murashige and Skoog basal medium on the in vitro flowering of roses after 60 d of culture.

Sucrose (mg/L)Shoot height (cm)Fresh weight (mg)Dry weight (mg)Flowering (%)
Control1.66 ± 0.11c121.17 ± 0.85b9.50 ± 0.22c-
403.35 ± 0.22a150.08 ± 1.06a14.93 ± 0.32a53.33 ± 8.01a
503.29 ± 0.16a149.66 ± 4.10a15.14 ± 0.34a51.48 ± 7.88a
602.49 ± 0.08b147.43 ± 2.06a14.25 ± 0.29b26.67 ±11.55b

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test)..


Table 3 . Effect of BA in Murashige and Skoog basal medium containing 30 g/L sucrose on the in vitro flowering of rose after 60 d of culture.

BA (mg/L)Shoot height (cm)Fresh weight (mg)Dry weight (mg)Flowering (%)
Control1.65 ± 0.10c121.17 ± 0.85e9.50 ± 0.22e-
0.52.20 ± 0.14b135.06 ± 2.50d11.30 ± 0.21d13.70 ± 5.48b
1.02.93 ± 0.15a142.23 ± 1.41c12.38 ± 0.34c45.18 ± 8.98a
1.52.07 ± 0.12b156.25 ± 3.79b14.14 ± 0.51b38.15 ± 7.40a
2.01.63 ± 0.19c187.71 ± 1.97a17.90 ± 0.76a18.70 ± 7.04b

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test)..

BA, 6-benzyladenine..


Table 4 . Effect of AgNO3 in Murashige and Skoog basal medium containing 30 g/L sucrose on in vitro flowering of rose after 60 d of culture.

AgNO3 (mg/L)Shoot height (cm)Fresh weight (mg)Dry weight (mg)Flowering (%)
01.65 ± 0.10d121.17 ± 0.85d9.50 ± 0.22c-
0.52.37 ± 0.10b128.06 ± 2.50c10.91 ± 0.18b17.04 ± 5.13c
13.06 ± 0.11a147.25 ± 3.58ab13.66 ± 0.49a56.67 ± 5.77a
1.52.49 ± 0.08b143.23 ± 2.51b13.15 ± 0.39a38.15 ± 7.40b
2.02.10 ± 0.14c149.44 ± 4.44a13.27 ± 0.36a18.33 ± 7.64c

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test)..

AgNO3, silver nitrate..


Table 5 . Effect of BA in Murashige and Skoog basal medium containing 1.0 mg/L AgNO3 and 40 g/L sucrose on the in vitro flowering of rose after 60 d of culture.

TreatmentShoot height (cm)Fresh weight (mg)Dry weight (mg)Flowering (%)
Sucrose (g/L)AgNO3 (mg/L)BA (mg/L)
401.001.90 ± 0.10c134.77 ± 1.90e11.07 ± 0.22d41.10 ± 8.40b
0.52.58 ± 0.11b141.06 ± 2.50d12.21 ± 0.18c44.81 ± 5.01b
1.03.49 ± 0.16a162.92 ± 2.97c15.68 ± 0.63b60.74 ± 5.60a
1.52.69 ± 0.08b156.23 ± 2.51b15.92 ± 0.16b44.81 ± 5.01b
2.01.71 ± 0.08c192.44 ± 4.44a18.90 ± 0.49a26.67 ± 2.89c

Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA, Duncan’s test)..

BA, 6-benzyladenine; AgNO3, silver nitrate..


References

  1. Bodson M, Outlaw WH (1985) Elevation in the Sucrose Content of the Shoot Apical Meristem of Sinapis alba at Floral Evocation. Plant Physiol 420-424. doi.org/10.1104/pp.79.2.420
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  2. Cardoso JC (2019) Silver nitrate enhances in vitro development and quality of shoots of Anthurium andraeanum. Sci Hortic 253:358-363. doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.04.054
    CrossRef
  3. Friend DJ, Bodson M, Bernier G (1984) Promotion of Flowering in Brassica campestris L. Cv Ceres by Sucrose. Plant Physiol 75(4). doi.org/10.1104/pp.75.4.1085
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Gago J, Martínez-Núñez L, Landín M, Flexas J, Gallego PP (2014) Modeling the Effects of Light and Sucrose on In Vitro Propagated Plants: A Multiscale System Analysis Using Artificial Intelligence Technology. PLOS ONE 9(1):e85989. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085989
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef Etc
  5. Hallmark HT, Rashotte AM (2019) Review - Cytokinin Response Factors: Responding to more than cytokinin. Plant Sci 289:110251. doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110251
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Han Y, Yang H, Jiao Y (2014) Regulation of inflorescence architecture by cytokinins. Front Plant Sci 5:119758. doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00669
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef Etc
  7. Kumar V, Parvatam G, Ravishankar GA (2009) AgNO3: a poten- tial regulator of ethylene activity and plant growth modulator. Electron J Biotechnol 12(2):1-15. doi.org/10.2225/vol12-issue2-fulltext-1
    CrossRef
  8. Lavie O, Buxdorf K, Eshed Williams L (2024) Optimizing cannabis cultivation: an efficient in vitro system for flowering induction. Plant Methods 20(1):141. doi.org/10.1186/s13007-024-01265-5
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef Etc
  9. Leus L, Laere KV, Riek JD, Huylenbroeck JV (2018) Rose (Chapter 27). In: Ornamental Crops: Handbook of Plant Breeding. Springer, Switzerland 11:719-767
    CrossRef
  10. Matos AVC, Oliveira BS, Oliveira M, Cardoso JC (2021) AgNO3 improved micropropagation and stimulate in vitro flowering of rose (Rosa x hybrida) cv. Sena. Ornam Hortic 27(1):33-40. doi.org/10.1590/2447-536X.v27i1.2161
    CrossRef
  11. Micallef BJ, Haskins KA, Vanderveer PJ (1995) Altered photosynthesis, flowering, and fruiting in transgenic tomato plants that have an increased capacity for sucrose synthesis. Planta 327-334. doi.org/10.1007/BF00201392
    CrossRef
  12. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15(3):473-497. doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb080 52.x
    CrossRef
  13. Nguyen NH, Van LB (2020) A simple, economical, and high efficient protocol to produce in vitro miniature rose. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 56:362-365. doi.org/10.1007/s11627-019-10043-1
    CrossRef
  14. Nowakowska K, Pińkowska A, Siedlecka E (2022) The effect of cytokinins on shoot proliferation, biochemical changes and genetic stability of Rhododendron 'Kazimierz Odnowiciel' in the in vitro cultures. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 149:675-684. doi.org/10.1007/s11240-021-02206-z
    CrossRef
  15. Saritha K, Naidu C (2007) In vitro flowering of Withania somnifera Dunal. -An important antitumor medicinal plant. Plant Sci 172(4):847-851. doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.12.016
    CrossRef
  16. Sarropoulou V, Dimassi-Theriou K, Therios I (2016) Efect of the ethylene inhibitors silver nitrate, silver sulfate, and cobalt chloride on micropropagation and biochemical parameters in the cherry rootstocks CAB-6P and Gisela 6. Turk J Biol 670-683. doi.org/10.3906/biy-1505-92
    CrossRef
  17. Sreelekshmi R, Siril E (2021) Investigation on in vitro bouquets and flower longevity of micropropagated Dianthus chinensis L. Sci Hortic 275:109708. doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109708
    CrossRef
  18. Sun J, Wang H, Ren L, Chen S, Chen F, Jiang J (2017) CmFTL2 is involved in the photoperiod- and sucrose-mediated control of flowering time in chrysanthemum. Hortic Res 1-6. doi.org/10.1038/hortres.2017.1
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  19. Taylor NJ, Light ME, Staden JV (2005) In vitro flowering of Kniphofia leucocephala: influence of cytokinins. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 83:327-333. doi.org/10.1007/s11240-005-8429-8
    CrossRef
  20. Tee CS, Maziah M, Tan CS (2008) Induction of in vitro flowering in the orchid Dendrobium Sonia 17. Biologia Plantarum 723-726. doi.org/10.1007/s10535-008-0139-8
    CrossRef
  21. Vu NH, Anh PH, Nhut DT (2006) The role of sucrose and different cytokinins in the in vitro floral morphogenesis of rose (hybrid tea) cv. "First Prize". Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 315-320. doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9089-z
    CrossRef
  22. Wang GY, Yuan MF, Hong Y (2002) In vitro flower induction in roses. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol -Plant 513-518. doi.org/10.1079/IVP2002340
    CrossRef
  23. Wingler A (2018) Transitioning to the Next Phase: The Role of Sugar Signaling throughout the Plant Life Cycle. Plant Physiol 176(2):1075-1084. doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01229
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  24. Yoon J, Cho L, Tun W, Jeon J, An G (2020) Sucrose signaling in higher plants Plant Sci. doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110703
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Yuan M, Weng S, Ma Y (2024) Study on physiological and biochemical characteristics during in vitro flowering of Rosa 'Yametsu-Hime' Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. doi.org/10.1007/s11240-024-02731-7
    CrossRef
  26. Zeng S, Liang S, Zhang YY (2013) In vitro flowering red miniature rose. Biol Plant 57:401-409. doi.org/10.1007/s10535-013-0306-4
    CrossRef Etc
  27. Zhang T (2007) In vitro flowering of Perilla frutescens In vitro Cell Dev- Pl. 43:91-94
    CrossRef
  28. Zhang Z, Leung DW (2000) A comparison of in vitro with in vivo flowering in Gentian. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 223-226
    CrossRef
JPB
Vol 52. 2025

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in JPB

Journal of

Plant Biotechnology

pISSN 1229-2818
eISSN 2384-1397
qr-code Download