J Plant Biotechnol 2015; 42(1): 25-33
Published online March 31, 2015
© The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology
Correspondence to : I. S. Shin Pear Research Station, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA, Naju, 520-821, Korea e-mail: shinis3@korea.kr
A PyrcpPR-10 gene with differentially expressed was isolated by using the suppression subtractive hybridization assay between ‘93-3-98’ (highly resistant against scab caused by Venturia nashicola) and ‘Sweat Skin’(highly susceptible) and analyzed the expression pattern according to organs and cultivars. The full length of PyrcpPR-10 was cloned as 743bp with 480bp’s ORP, and was determined to encode a protein of 159 amino acid residues. On analyzing PyrcpPR-10 gene sequence compared with resistant and susceptible cultivars, ‘Hwangsilri’ (resistant), ‘Gamcheonbae’ (moderately resistant), ‘Wonhwang’ (moderately susceptible), ‘Niitaka’ (highly susceptible), and ‘Sweat Skin’ (highly susceptible) had identical gene sequence but ‘Bartlett’ (highly resistant) showed partly different sequences. The deduced amino acid sequence showed 64 ~ 98% homology and had the GXGGXG motif to known amino acid of other plants PR-10 by the BLAST X analysis. Among several organs or tissues, petal was showed highest expression level of PyrcpPR-10 gene followed by leaf, floral axis, bud, and bark. The expression level of PyrcpPR-10 gene was dramatically increased at 24 hr after inoculation in all cultivars and also up-regulated in accordance with resistant degree of cultivars. While resistant cultivars (‘Bartlett’, ‘93-3-98’, and ‘Hwangsilri’) induced relatively high expression level of PyrcpPR-10 gene, susceptible cultivars (‘Niitaka’, and ‘Sweat Skin’) showed low expression level. PyrcpPR-10 gene is assumed that it is directly connected with defense mechanisms to pear scab.
Keywords PyrcpPR-10, Gene expression, Resistant degree, Pear Scab
J Plant Biotechnol 2015; 42(1): 25-33
Published online March 31, 2015
Copyright © The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology.
Jae An Chun, Se Hee Kim, Kang Hee Cho, Dae Hyun Kim, In Myong Choi, Il Sheob Shin
Correspondence to:
I. S. Shin
Pear Research Station, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA, Naju, 520-821, Korea
e-mail: shinis3@korea.kr
A PyrcpPR-10 gene with differentially expressed was isolated by using the suppression subtractive hybridization assay between ‘93-3-98’ (highly resistant against scab caused by Venturia nashicola) and ‘Sweat Skin’(highly susceptible) and analyzed the expression pattern according to organs and cultivars. The full length of PyrcpPR-10 was cloned as 743bp with 480bp’s ORP, and was determined to encode a protein of 159 amino acid residues. On analyzing PyrcpPR-10 gene sequence compared with resistant and susceptible cultivars, ‘Hwangsilri’ (resistant), ‘Gamcheonbae’ (moderately resistant), ‘Wonhwang’ (moderately susceptible), ‘Niitaka’ (highly susceptible), and ‘Sweat Skin’ (highly susceptible) had identical gene sequence but ‘Bartlett’ (highly resistant) showed partly different sequences. The deduced amino acid sequence showed 64 ~ 98% homology and had the GXGGXG motif to known amino acid of other plants PR-10 by the BLAST X analysis. Among several organs or tissues, petal was showed highest expression level of PyrcpPR-10 gene followed by leaf, floral axis, bud, and bark. The expression level of PyrcpPR-10 gene was dramatically increased at 24 hr after inoculation in all cultivars and also up-regulated in accordance with resistant degree of cultivars. While resistant cultivars (‘Bartlett’, ‘93-3-98’, and ‘Hwangsilri’) induced relatively high expression level of PyrcpPR-10 gene, susceptible cultivars (‘Niitaka’, and ‘Sweat Skin’) showed low expression level. PyrcpPR-10 gene is assumed that it is directly connected with defense mechanisms to pear scab.
Keywords: PyrcpPR-10, Gene expression, Resistant degree, Pear Scab
Toan Khac Nguyen ・Jin Hee Lim
J Plant Biotechnol 2021; 48(3): 139-147Yu Jin Jung・Joung Soon Park ・Ji Yun Go ・Hyo Ju Lee ・Jin Young Kim・Ye Ji Lee ・Ki Hong Nam ・ Yong-Gu Cho ・Kwon Kyoo Kang
J Plant Biotechnol 2021; 48(3): 124-130Phyo Phyo Win Pe ・Swum Yi Kyua ・Aung Htay Naing ・Kyeung Il Park ・Mi‑Young Chung ・Chang Kil Kim
J Plant Biotechnol 2020; 47(3): 203-208
Journal of
Plant Biotechnology