Research Article

Split Viewer

J Plant Biotechnol (2023) 50:127-136

Published online June 22, 2023

https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2023.50.016.127

© The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology

Chlorophyll contents and expression profiles of photosynthesis-related genes in water-stressed banana plantlets

Sri Nanan Widiyanto ・Syahril Sulaiman ・Simon Duve ・Erly Marwani ・Husna Nugrahapraja ・Diky Setya Diningrat

School of Life Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
School of Life Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Medan State University, Medan 20221, Indonesia

Correspondence to : e-mail: srinanan@sith.itb.ac.id

Received: 12 March 2023; Revised: 1 May 2023; Accepted: 23 May 2023

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Water scarcity decreases the rate of photosynthesis and, consequently, the yield of banana plants (Musa spp). In this study, transcriptome analysis was performed to identify photosynthesis-related genes in banana plants and determine their expression profiles under water stress conditions. Banana plantlets were in vitro cultured on Murashige and Skoog agar medium with and without 10% polyethylene glycol and marked as BP10 and BK. Chlorophyll contents in the plant shoots were determined spectrophotometrically. Two cDNA libraries generated from BK and BP10 plantlets, respectively, were used as the reference for transcriptome data. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) and visualized using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway prediction. Morphological observations indicated that water deficiency caused chlorosis and reduced the shoot chlorophyll content of banana plantlets. GO enrichment identified 52 photosynthesis-related genes that were affected by water stress. KEGG visualization revealed the pathways related to the 52 photosynthesisrelated genes and their allocations in four GO terms. Four, 12, 15, and 21 genes were related to chlorophyll biosynthesis, the Calvin cycle, the photosynthetic electron transfer chain, and the light-harvesting complex, respectively. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis using DESeq revealed that 45 genes were down-regulated, whereas seven genes were up-regulated. Four of the down-regulated genes were responsible for chlorophyll biosynthesis and appeared to cause the decrease in the banana leaf chlorophyll content. Among the annotated DEGs, MaPNDO, MaPSAL, and MaFEDA were selected and validated using quantitative real-time PCR.

Keywords Musa acuminata Colla, Photosynthesis, Transcriptome analysis, Water deficiency

Bananas (Musa spp) are considered as one of major food crops since it is providing a substantial source of nutrition and food security in the world. Bananas are originated and grown well in Southeast Asia, including Indonesia. Majority of cultivated banana cultivars have arisen primarily as a result of hybridizations between M. acuminata (‘A’-genome) and M. balbisiana (‘B’-genome) which naturally resulted in various combinations of these two genomes. Most edible fruit bananas are parthenocarpy and triploids (Davey et al. 2013; Nayar 2010) with genome constitutions of AAA (dessert banana), AAB (plantains) and ABB (cooking bananas).

Banana plants are known to suffer against water deficiency, although the drought tolerance response in banana is genotype-dependent (Nansamba et al. 2020; Ravi et al. 2013). There was a tendency that banana varieties with more ‘B’ genome are more tolerant to drought stress compare to the varieties with more ‘A’ genome (Wang et al. 2020). Studies were reported to discover effects of water stress to the disruption of physiological and biochemical processes in banana. Water deficiency is known to alter the normal condition of banana plants and causes the morphological and physiological changes. Many reports showed that to prevent water loss, tolerant banana plants made various morphological adjustments, such as leaf rolling, root lengthening, leaf size reduction, and leaf abscission. Changes also occurred in the cellular level, including changes in metabolic pathway directions, nutrient and ion uptakes, synthesis of new proteins or modulation of free radical generation (Surendar et al. 2013a; Wang et al. 2020).

To improve understanding about the molecular mechanism of banana plants to respond water stress, some studies have been accomplished using the next generation sequencing (NGS) technology. Transcriptomic analysis has become a reliable approach to unravel the integrated insight into abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms occurred in banana plants (Backiyarani et al. 2015; Hu et al. 2017). Transcriptomic analysis approach was able to discover enriched differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from cDNA libraries of the tolerant and sensitive banana cultivars that exposed to drought (Muthusamy et al. 2016). In drought-stressed banana, identified DEGs were mainly involved in important bioprocesses, such as lipid metabolism, carbohydrate degradation, protein modifications, alkaloid biosynthesis and other secondary metabolites. Major biological processes were known to be influenced by water deficiency, including photosynthesis, cellular respiration, responses to stress, and organ development.

Photosynthesis seems to be the most altered by drought and is very closely related to banana growth and fruit production (Surendar et al. 2013b). Impacts of water stress on photosynthesis have been studied based on molecular perspective in various plant species. Studies discovered disturbances of water deficit condition on photosynthesis and successfully identified some responsive genes involved in photosynthesis. Water scarcity has been known to decrease not only the photosynthesis rate, but also destruct the photosystem II, causing the decline of light capture capacity (Sasi et al. 2018). It was suggested that water- stress caused stomata closure, decreases stomata conductance and resulting in diverting electrons from the photosynthetic electron transport chain to molecular oxygen generating ROS at the end of photosystem I (Chen et al. 2020). It was reported that water shortage defected the protein structures of oxygen-evolving complex of PSII and PSI reaction centers (Dalal and Tripathy 2018). However, further studies are still needed to identify the potential genes for developing DNA based markers in the future. This study was aimed to identify photosynthetic related genes of water stressed banana plantlets and determining its expression profiles based on transcriptional analysis. A transcriptome dataset was generated from cDNA libraries of banana plantlets, Musa acuminata cv Barangan Merah, which is one of the most popular banana cultivars in Indonesia that producing nutritive banana fruits (Sebayang et al. 2018). Nevertheless, as is common in M. acuminata species with A genome constitution, Barangan Merah banana is susceptible to water shortage and greatly reduces the fruit production as the impacts of insufficiency water supply. Hence, it is worthwhile to understand how severely the water stress induced alterations on photosynthesis in banana cv Barangan Merah using a molecular approach. The transcriptome dataset used in this study has been registered and submitted at the NCBI BioProject database (BioProject ID PRJNA970186).

Plant Materials

Plantlets of banana, M. acuminata cv ‘Barangan Merah’ were used in experiments as the source of samples for chlorophyll content determination and confirmation of gene expressions. Plantlets were cultured and in vitro regenerated from axillary shoots on MS agar medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) which was supplemented with 5 µM 6-Benzylaminopurine (BA). Shoots were sub- cultured every four weeks and used as explant sources for water stress treatments. To induce water deficiency condition, 10% polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000) was added into culture medium of the BP10 shoot cultures. Shoots grown on culture medium without PEG were used as the control treatment (BK). Shoots were regenerated into plantlets in four weeks. Banana in vitro cultures were placed in a controlled room at 22 ± 2°C and continuous-lighting. Six replicates were made for each treatment. After a four-week period of PEG treatments, BK and BP10 plantlets were collected for chlorophyll and RNA extractions.

Determination of Chlorophyll Content

Shoot parts were detached from plantlets of the BK and BP10 after a four-week PEG treatment and prepared for chlorophyll extraction. As much as 0.1 g shoot tissues grinded and added with two ml 96% ethanol in 4-6 minutes until all the chlorophyll was dissolved (Wintermans and De Mots, 1965). Crude extracts were filtered with filter paper Whatman No.1. Chlorophyll contents were measured using a spectrophotometer (BioRad SmartSpec™Plus) at 649 nm and 665 nm wavelengths.

Transcriptomic Analysis for GO Enrichment and DEGseq Analysis

A transcriptome dataset obtained from previous experiments was used in this study as a reference data (Widiyanto et al. 2019, unpublished report) and as it was mentioned that the sequences of transcriptome data was registered at the NCBI BioProject database. Two cDNA libraries of banana (M. acuminata cv ‘Barangan Merah’) were generated and constructed from plantlets of BK (control) and the highest- level stress treatment with the addition of 10% PEG (BP10). Transcriptomic analysis was performed to identify photosynthetic related genes and visualize its prediction pathways. The cDNA library generated from BP10 was subjected to be annotated for gene ontology (GO) enrichment and the cDNA library of BK was used to normalize. To annotate photosynthesis-related genes, the GO enrichment was accomplished using the database of DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery). The KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome) was applied to visualize photosynthetic-related gene pathways of the banana plantlets (BP10) under 10% PEG-induced water stress. The read-count data of photosynthesis-related genes were analyzed using DESeq package for determining relative expressions of annotated genes. The gene expressed numbers were normalized to the number of transcripts per million (TPM) tags (Love et al. 2014). Each unigene was grouped based on the ratio of TPM to that of the control data and further analyzed with a cut-off ratio of log10 > 2 to obtain the list of unigenes with multiples of more than 100 times compared to those of the control group (p-value ≤ 0.001).

Validation of Gene Expressions

To confirm the expressions of selected DEGs, an independent experiment was conducted to replicate a similar experiment with previous experiments when the cDNA libraries of transcriptome data were constructed. The total RNA samples were isolated from in vitro shoot cultures of the BK and BP10 banana cv Barangan Merah plantlets after four weeks of the PEG treatment. Three genes i.e., MaFEDA (2Fe-2S ferredoxin), MaPSAL (photosystem I subunit l) and MaPYROXD1 (pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase) were selected from the annotated DEGs list (Supplementary Table S.1) and subjected to qRT-PCR assay for validation of gene expressions. Primer pairs (Table 1) were designed using the Primer3Plus package, checked with the Primer Blaster, and compared to that of the banana genome available at CIRAD with the M. acuminata genome. Gene expression validation was performed using the qRT-PCR assay procedure. Total RNA samples were isolated from shoots tissues using the CTAB method (Kusdianti et al. 2016). The cDNA was constructed using the GoScriptTM Reverse Transcription System according to manufacture manual (Promega, USA). Three technical replicates were applied in the qRT-PCR assay. Gene expression data were normalized with two housekeeping genes, the MaACT and MaBT. Relative expression levels were determined using the 2-ΔΔCT method (Hu et al. 2017; Livak and Schmittgen 2001).

Table 1 . The primer sequences used for amplifying the selected (MaFEDA, MaPSAL, and MaPYROXD1), and housekeeping genes

SymbolGene nameForward primerReverse primerAmplification length (bases)
MaACTActin (housekeeping gene)CTGACTGGCAGCAGGACATACCAAATCGTGCCTTTGAACT162
MaBTBetatubulin (housekeeping gene)AGTCCGGAGCTTCAACCTTTACGCTGACGATGGAGAAGAC221
MaFEDA2Fe-2S ferredoxinTTGCCATCTCTCCCTGTCTTGGCATTCGATCACCTTCTCT214
MaPSALphotosystem I subunit lGCATCTCACGAACACCATTGGATGGGCTGAATCACTTGGT196
MaPYROXYD1Pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductaseGCTTTCTCCAGCATCAAAGGCCCATTCCTCCTTCGACATA216

Morphological Changes and Total Chlorophyll Content

Morphological observation indicated that plantlets of banana cv Barangan Merah regenerated from 10% PEG- exposed shoots (BP10) were turned pale and chlorosis after four weeks of culturing (Fig. 1). Leaves of plantlets were obviously experienced reduction of the normal growth and green coloration. In line with the morphological changes, chlorophyll determination implied that water deficiency caused a considerable reduction in total chlorophyll content (Fig. 2). Compare to that of the control plantlets (BK), total chlorophyll contents of the BP10 plantlets, as well as chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b were obviously decrease. It seemed that water deficiency experienced in banana plantlets inhibited its growth and chlorophyll biosynthesis, particularly in shoot parts.

Fig. 1. Banana cv Barangan Merah plantlets cultured for four weeks in Murashige and Skoog agar medium (a) without (BK; control) and (b) with (BP10) 10% polyethylene glycol
Fig. 2. The total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b contents of shoots of the control (BK) and 10% PEG-treated (BP10) plantlets

Gene Ontology Enrichment of Photosynthetic Genes

The GO enrichment was completed using DAVID and identified 52 photosynthesis-related genes that were affected by water stress in BP10 plantlets Supplementary Table S.1. The 52 photosynthetic genes were distributed in four GO terms i.e., four genes in chlorophyll biosynthesis, twelve genes in Calvin cycle pathway, fifteen genes in photosystem-electron transfer chain (PETC), and twenty- one genes in antenna light harvesting complex proteins (Table 2). The 52 identified genes were among the 100 annotated genes that either the most downregulated or upregulated in PEG treatments (PEG 2.5, PEG7, and PEG10) and listed in Supplementary Table S.2-S.3. The KEGG prediction pathway was applied to visualize the photosynthesis-related gene allocations.

Table 2 . The number of photosynthesis-related genes in water-stressed banana plantlets (categorized under four GO terms based on DAVID)

GO terminologyNumbers of genes
Biosynthesis of chlorophyll4
Calvin cycle12
Light-harvesting complex15
Photosynthetic electron transfer chain21

Total photosynthetic genes affected52


Changes in Gene Expressions in Chlorophyll Biosynthesis

Based on transcriptomic analyses there were four genes in chlorophyll biosynthesis that affected by water stress (Table 3) and mapped into KEGG pathway (Supplementary Data Fig. S.1). The four genes are MaPORA, MaPORB, MaHEMA1, and MaPYROXD1, each of them encoded for the enzyme of synthesis of protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase-A, the enzyme of protochlorophyllide oxido-reductase-B, the family protein of glutamyl-tRNA reductase, and the family protein of pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase. Prediction pathway of KEGG showed that the four affected genes were down-regulated and lowering gene expressions in porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism. Changes in gene expressions seemed to be related with the decrease of chlorophyll content in BP10 plantlets.

Table 3 . List of the four genes related to porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism whose expressions were altered under water stress (according to the KEGG prediction pathway)

Enzyme codeMusa IDSymbolGene name (encoded protein)
1.3.1.33Ma11_p01810.1MaPORAprotochlorophyllide oxidoreductase A
Ma03_p14780.1MaPORBprotochlorophyllide oxidoreductase B

1.2.1.70Ma02_p00210.1MaHEMA1glutamyl-tRNA reductase family protein

1.3.1.111Ma08_p24890.1MaPYROXD1pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase family protein


Alterations in Calvin Cycle

The Calvin cycle has three main phases, those are the carbon fixation, the reduction of carbon dioxide and regeneration of carbon dioxide acceptor phases. There were 12 identified genes in Calvin cycle that altered by water stress and were mapped into KEGG pathway. The alteration of 12 genes were illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S.2 and listed in Table 4. Based on KEGG pathway, there were seven genes up-regulated and five genes down- regulated. Water deficiency was down-regulated four genes of the 3-PGA biosynthesis in reduction phase and five genes in the RuBp regeneration phase. Water stress also interfered the expressions of transketolase (2.2.1.1) and aldolase superfamily protein (4.1.2.13) genes.

Table 4 . List of the twelve Calvin cycle-related genes whose expressions were altered by 10% PEG; seven genes were up-regulated and five genes were down-regulated

Enzyme codeMusa IDSymbolGene name (encoded protein)
Up-regulated:

1.1.1.37Ma05_p03680.1c-NAD-MDH2lactate or malate dehydrogenase

1.2.1.12Ma06_p01470.1GAPC2glyceraldehyde-3phosphate dehydrogenase C2
Ma06_p01470.1GAPCP-1glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of plastid 1

2.6.1.2Ma11_p08770.1ALAAT2alanine aminotransferase 2

4.1.2.13Ma06_p11050.1PDE345aldolase superfamily protein (PDE345)
Ma05_p27790.1FBA8aldolase superfamily protein (FBA8)
Ma05_p27790.1FBA6aldolase superfamily protein (FBA6)

Down-regulated:

1.2.1.13Ma10_p12550.1GAPAglyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase A
Ma11_p20650.1GAPBglyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase B

2.2.1.1Ma03_p16840.1TKL2transketolase

2.7.1.19Ma05_p03450.1PRKphosphoribulo kinase

2.7.9.1Ma03_p26110.1PPDKpyruvate orthophosphate dikinase


Disturbances to Antenna and Light Harvesting Complex (LHC) Proteins

Light harvesting is the first subprocess in light-dependent reactions occurs in antenna protein complexes located in photosystems on thylakoid membranes. There were 15 genes related to light harvesting complex and antenna proteins that affected by 10% PEG treatment which were mapped into KEGG pathway (Table 5). The KEGG map showed the allocations of 15 genes in the light harvesting complex (LHC) and antenna (Supplementary Fig. S.3). Identified genes consisted of 5 light harvesting complex-a (Lhca) genes located in photosystem I and 10 light harvesting complex-b (Lhcb) genes in photosystem II. It was indicated that photosystem-II was more sensitive and had more impacts by water stress than photosystem- I.

Table 5 . List of the 15 genes related to the antenna or light-harvesting complex (LHC) whose expressions were altered under water stress; according to the KEGG pathway, there were five light-harvesting complex-a (Lhca) genes located in photosystem I and 10 light-harvesting complex-b (Lhcb) genes in photosystem II

KEGG CodeMusa IDSymbolGene name (encoded protein)
Lhca1Ma02_p08270.1LHCA1chlorophyll a-b binding protein 6

Lhca2Ma06_p22130.1LHCA2photosystem I light-harvesting complex protein

Lhca3Ma03_p03930.1LHCA3PSI type III chlorophyll a/b-binding protein

Lhca4Ma02_p16740.1LHCA4light-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex I s.u A4

Lhcb1Ma10_p15370.1CAB1chlorophyll A/B binding protein 1
Ma02_p11170.1LHB1B1light-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex II-B1
Ma10_p15370.1LHB1B2photosystem II LHC protein-B1B2

Lhcb2Ma04_p39550.1LHCB2.1photosystem II light-harvesting complex protein 2.1
Ma04_p39550.1LHCB2.2photosystem II light-harvesting complex protein 2.2
Ma02_p11170.1LHCB2.3photosystem II light-harvesting complex protein 2.3

Lhcb3Ma09_p21570.1LHCB3light-harvesting chlorophyll B-binding protein 3

Lhcb4Ma08_p03640.1LHCB4.1light-harvesting complex photosystem II
Ma09_p02760.1LHCB4.2light-harvesting complex photosystem II

Lhcb5Ma06_p14120.2LHCB5light-harvesting complex of photosystem II 5

Lhcb6Ma07_p20600.1LHCB6light-harvesting complex photosystem II subunit 6


Disruptions to Photosystem Electron Transfer Chain (PETC)

Genes related to photosystem-electron transfer chain (PETC) that disrupted by water deficiency were mapped into KEGG pathway (Fig. 3) and listed in Supplementary Table S.1. The water stress condition was down-regulated a total of 21 genes in photosystem-electron transfer chain (PETC) that might cause changes of excitation rate of electrons. These genes composed of a gene encodes enzyme 1.18.1.2 (FNR2), two genes encode carrier proteins (DRT112 and FED A), ten genes encode photosystem I subunits, and eight genes encode photosystem II subunits (Fig. 3). Water deficiency was also disrupted the PSBO (oxygen evolving complex-1) gene, the component of photosystem II and known to play a role in water photolysis. Prediction pathway of KEGG showed that the light energy that captured by the antenna protein will be passed to the reaction center and excited the electron to a higher energy level (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Water stress-induced changes in the photosynthetic electron transfer chain (PETC) of BP10 banana plantlets. A total of 21 genes were down-regulated (marked with red stars; listed in Supplementary Table S.1)

Verification of Selected DEGs

The confirmation of gene expressions showed that compared to the control plantlet (BK), the relative expressions of MaFEDA, MaPSAL, and MaPNDO genes were obviously altered by PEG-induced water stress in BP10 plantlets (Fig. 4). Based on its relative expression values, the MaFEDA and MaPYROXD1 genes were down-regulated, whereas MaPSAL was up-regulated as responses to water stress.

Fig. 4. The RT-qPCR-based expression profiles of MaFEDA, MaPYROXD1, and MaPSAL genes in the shoots of BP10 plantlets

Water deficiency is a critical factor for the growth of banana plants and causing substantial changes in its growth, morphological features and biochemistry reactions. Chlorosis is the condition of plant tissues, especially in shoots or leaves that lost their green color and turn pale as the result of lack of chlorophyll pigment (Surendar et al. 2013b). The chlorosis occurred in leaves of 10% PEG-exposed plantlets seemed to be correlated with the disruption in chlorophyll biosynthesis process. Chlorosis in banana leaves seemed to be occurred because of the deterioration of chlorophyll and other photosynthetic pigments (Vergeiner et al. 2013). Water shortage is also known to cause the disruption of ultrastructural feature of chloroplasts in teak (Galeano et al. 2019). The transcriptomic analysis in this study would be able to discover the reason.

Water stress in banana plantlets caused the decrease in chlorophyll content up to 52% (Fig. 2). A considerable reduction in total chlorophyll contents was also noticed in banana plants under water shortage condition in the field (Surendar et al. 2013b). Water stress decreased total chlorophyll content and declined yield of banana production. Chlorophyll biosynthesis is consisting of a biochemical reaction series and catalyzed by numerous enzymes as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S.1. At least there are three distinct phases in chlorophyll biosynthesis. The first phase begins from glutamic acid metabolism pathway, including the heme biosynthesis pathway to synthesize protoporphyrin. Glutamyl-tRNA reductase family protein (1.2.1.70) enzyme encoded by the HEMA1 gene that catalyze early stages of heme biosynthesis. The second phase is the chlorophyll-a (Chla) synthesis and the photoreduction of protochlorophyllide (Pchlide) to produce chlorophyllide (Chlide) which is catalyzed by protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR) enzyme. The POR proteins are the essential enzymes in chlorophyll biosynthesis, including PORA and PORB and PORC proteins (Zhao et al. 2020). The third phase is the interconversion of Chl a and chlorophyll b (Chl b) which is catalyzed by chlorophyllide an oxygenase (CAO).

As it was mentioned, the reference transcriptome data used in this study was obtained from previous experiments (Widiyanto et al. 2019, unpublished report). The transcriptome dataset was generated from four cDNA libraries of banana plantlets using Illumina MiSeqTM 2000 platform. In experiments, banana plantlets were in vitro regenerated from shoot-buds of M. acuminata cv Barangan Merah. Polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000) at 2.5% (BP2), 7.5% (BP7), and 10% (BP10) was supplemented to induce a water shortage condition. The control (BK) plantlets were grown without PEG. Transcriptome profiling was achieved through a bioinformatics analysis flow, including the assembly, the estimation of gene abundance, the annotation, the differential expressed genes analysis, and the gene ontology (GO) enrichment. Transcriptomic profiles indicated there were 3,351 genes altered by water stress which were covering 113 terminologies in biological processes. Statistical analysis identified 1,744 genes as differentially expressed (DEGs) under PEG treatment in which 1,046 genes of them were mapped to the reference genomes, Musa acuminata cv Pahang at CIRAD. These DEGs were distributed in 26 functional clusters. Among those genes, 233 annotated genes, were consistently downregulated in all PEG treatments and 100 genes of them were listed in Supplementary Data Table S.3. Conversely, 762 genes were persistently upregulated. A total of 100 genes with the highest expression level that enhanced by at least thousand times were listed in Supplementary Data Table S.4. However, transcriptomic analysis has not been thoroughly unraveled to discover the impacts of water stress treatments to any major bioprocess in details, specifically photosynthesis. In this study, further transcriptomic analysis was directed to reveal how water stress altered and disrupted particularly in photosynthesis pathway and its apparatus. The highest level of stress (10% PEG) was taken into consideration as it seemed to generate severe impacts on banana plantlet’s growth.

Correspondingly with the results of this study, KEGG mapping showed that in BP10 plantlets, water stress down-regulated the MaPORA, MaPORB, and MaHEMA1 genes and caused to depress the biosynthesis of its encoded enzymes. Changes in level expressions of enzymes in porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism seemed to cause the decrease of chlorophyll biosynthesis in BP10 plantlets. Water stress was also down-regulated the MaPYROXD1 gene that is known to play a role in the biosynthesis of chlorophyll and also involved in terpenoid backbones biosynthesis in plant cells. Alterations of gene expressions that responsible for chlorophyll biosynthesis seemed to cause the decrease of chlorophyll content in leaf tissues of banana plantlets exposed to PEG. Similar result in rice seedling and potato that drought stress also changed the expressions of PORA and PORB genes (Chen et al. 2020; Nguyen et al. 2021).

The three main stages of Calvin cycle reactions are connected processes to each other. Changes in expression levels of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (1.2.1.12 and 1.2.1.13) genes at the 3-phosphoglyceric acid (PGA) reduction phase will affect the formation of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (GAPC), which can interfere the regeneration process of ribulose biphosphate (RuBP) and consequently will disturb the formation of glucose. Changes the expression levels of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenases (1.2.1.12 and 1.2.1.13) genes seemed to affect four of the six stages of RuBP regeneration, and hence will disrupt the CO2 fixation process. Although drought stress did not affect gene expression related to CO2 fixation directly, but changes in gene expression related to RuBp regeneration will also interfere the CO2 fixation process. Comparably, in rice seedling, the addition of PEG also declined the efficiency activity of Rubisco and reduced the activity of other enzymes of the carbon fixation pathway. Further analysis revealed the down- regulation of proteins involved in carbon reduction reactions, such as rubisco, triose-phosphate-isomerase (TPI), fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase, sedoheptulose-1, 7-bisphophatase, and phosphoglycerate kinase (Dalal and Tripathy 2018).

In potato, dehydration was evidently reflected drought- responsive genes related to the alteration of the chloroplast structure (Chen et al. 2020). Water stress has been known to decrease the capacity of light capture, especially in C3 plants. It was indicated that photosystem II (PSII) was more disturbed by water stress than photosystem I (PSI), and it means that LHCB gene seemed to be more sensitive than LHCA. Similar results in rice seedling, water-stress obviously decreased the light absorption by antennae and also reduced the rates of electron transport (Dalal and Tripathy 2018). In Arabidopsis, the absence of one of the LHCA1/LHCA4 and LHCA3/LHCA2 dimers caused structural changes that unable to be replaced by other LHCA proteins. Loss of functions of LHCB1 and LHCB2 will lead to reduce light absorption, while loss of function of LHCB5 and LHCB6 will induce declining the efficiency of energy transfer from LHCB to PSII reaction center (Sasi et al. 2018).

Drought stress known to cause disruption of functions of structural and carrier proteins and also decrease the excitation rate of electrons at the reaction center of photosystems. Changes in expression levels of structural protein genes in the reaction center seemed not directly to cause loss of its functions (Wada et al. 2019). Our result showed that among genes related to photosystem-electron transfer chain there was one gene encodes enzyme 1.18.1.2 (FNR2) that disrupted by water stress (Fig. 3), and has been known to cause immediate obstruction at the end of electron transfer process. The disruption of FNR2 enzyme will inhibit NADPH production, which plays an important role as the source of energy in carbon dioxide assimilation of the Calvin cycle, nitrogen-lipid metabolism, chlorophyll biosynthesis and regulation of stromal redox (Li et al. 2017). Water deficiency was also known to downsize the light-harvesting antenna complex to protect from photo- oxidative damage and inducing the reduction of photosynthetic electron transport process. Similar results were reported in rice and potato seedlings (Dalal and Tripathy 2018). Disturbances of drought to photosynthetic electron transport process and damage both PSII and PSI reaction centers had been reported in many plants, including young apple tree (Wang et al. 2018).

This study showed that the addition of 10% PEG induced water deficiency condition in banana plantlets and evidently affected not only chlorophyll biosynthesis, but also altered the biochemical reactions in Calvin cycle, disturbed the light-harvesting capacity and disrupted the electron transfer process in photosystem chains. Water deficiency made impacts to the expressions of 52 genes related to photosynthesis process of M. acuminata Colla cv ‘Barangan Merah’ plantlets. The 52 genes were allocated in chlorophyll biosynthesis (4 genes), in Calvin cycle (9 genes), in light harvesting complex (15 genes), and in electron transfer- photosystem chain (21 genes). Based on relative gene expression values of the 52 genes showed that a total of 45 genes were down-regulated, and 8 genes were up-regulated. Results of transcriptomic analysis in this study will be useful for developing drought-resistant banana plants in the future.

SNW: Conceptualization, research supervision, writing of original draft manuscript; SS & SD: Methodology, formal analysis, research investigation; EM & HN: Visualization, review and editing of manuscript; FSI: Data curation, formal analysis; DSD: Critically review and editing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

This research was supported by: the Master Degree to Doctoral Scholarship Program for Excellence Undergraduate (PMDSU), Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of National Education, Indonesia (2019-2020); and the Program of Research, Community Service, and Innovation (2020-2021), School of Life Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia.

  1. Backiyarani S, Uma S, Saraswathu MS, Saravanakumar AS, Chandrasekar A (2015) Transcriptome analysis of banana (Musa balbisiana) based on next-generation sequencing technology. Turk J Agric For 39(5):705-717. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1406-171
    CrossRef
  2. Chen Y, Li C, Yi J, Yang Y, Lei C, Gong M (2020) Transcriptome response to drought, rehydration and re-dehydration in potato. Int J Mol Sci 21(1):159. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21010159
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Dalal VK, Tripathy BC (2018). Water-stress induced downsizing of light-harvesting antenna complex protects developing rice seedlings from photo-oxidative damage. Sci Rep 8:5955. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14419-4
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Davey MW, Gudimella R, Harikrishna JA, Sin LW, Khalid N, Keulemans J (2013) A draft Musa balbisiana genome sequence for molecular genetics in polyploid, inter- and intra-specific Musa hybrids. Genomics 14(683):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-683
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Galeano E, Vasconcelos TS, Novais de Oliveira P, Carrer H (2019) Physiological and molecular responses to drought stress in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). PLoS ONE 14(9):e0221571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221571
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Hu W, Ding Z, Tie W, Yan Y, Liu Y, Wu C, Liu J, Wang J, Peng M, Xu B, Jin Z (2017) Comparative physiological and transcriptomic analyses provide integrated insight into osmotic, cold, and salt stress tolerance mechanisms in banana. Sci Rep 7:e43007. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43007
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Kusdianti, Diningrat DS, Iriawati, Widiyanto SN (2016) P5CS and HSP 81-2 gene expression profile of banana (Musa acuminata) in vitro culture under salt stress condition. J Plant Sci 11(4):91-95. https://doi.org/10.3923/jps.2016.91.95
    CrossRef
  8. Li J, Cang Z, Jiao F, Bai X, Zhang D, Zhai R (2017) Influence of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and protective enzymes of potato at seedling stage. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 16(1):82-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2015.03.001
    CrossRef
  9. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using realtime quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25(4):402-408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15(550):1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plantarum 15:473-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
    CrossRef
  12. Muthusamy M, Uma S, Backiyarani S, Saraswathi MS, Chandrasekar A (2016) Transcriptomic changes of drought-tolerant and sensitive banana cultivars exposed to drought stress. Front Plant Sci 7:e1609. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01609
    CrossRef
  13. Nansamba M, Sibiya J, Tumuhimbise R, Karamura D, Kubiriba J, Karamura E (2020) Breeding banana (Musa spp.) for drought tolerance: A review. Plant Breed 139(4):685-696. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12812
    CrossRef
  14. Nayar NM (2010) The Bananas: Botany, Origin, Dispersal. In: Horticultural Reviews Vol. 36, Janick, J. (Ed). Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, US. pp 117-164. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470527238.ch2
    CrossRef
  15. Nguyen MK, Shih TH, Lin S-H, Lin J-W, Nguyen HC, Yang ZW, Yang CM (2021) Transcription profile analysis of chlorophyll biosynthesis in leaves of wild-type and chlorophyll b deficient rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agriculture 11:e401. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11050401
    CrossRef
  16. Ravi I, Uma S, Vaganan MM, Mustaffa MM (2013) Phenotyping bananas for drought resistance. Front Physiol 4(9):1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00009
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Sasi S, Venkatesh J, Daneshi R, Gururani MA (2018) Photosystem II extrinsic proteins and their putative role in abiotic stress tolerance in higher plants. Plants 7(4):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7040100
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Sebayang NS, Puspita DE, Basri S (2018) Different planting media in Barangan banana (Musa Acuminata Colla) breeding in Southeast Aceh. Indonesian J Agric Res 1(3):307-316. https://doi.org/10.32734/injar.v1i3.473
    CrossRef
  19. Surendar KK, Devi DD, Ravi I, Krishnakumar S, Kumar SR, Velayudham K (2013a) Water stress in banana - A review. Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci 2(6):1-18. https://bepls.com/may2013/1.pdf
  20. Surendar KK, Devi DD, Ravi I, Jeyakumar P, Velayudham K (2013b) Water stress affects plant relative water content, soluble protein, total chlorophyll content and yield of ratoon banana. Int J Hort 3:96-103. https://doi.org/10.5376/ijh.2013.03.0017
    CrossRef
  21. Vergeiner C, Banala S, Krautler B (2013) Chlorophyll breakdown in senescent banana leaves: Catabolism reprogrammed for biosynthesis of persistent blue fluorescent tetrapyrroles. Chem Eur J 19:12294-12305. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201301907
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Wada S, Takagi D, Miyake C, Makino A, Suzuki Y (2019) Responses of the photosynthetic electron transport reactions stimulate the oxidation of the reaction center chlorophyll of photosystem I P700, under drought and high temperatures in rice. Int J Mol Sci 20(9):2068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092068
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Wang R, Xu Y, Li XG, Shen Y, Wang LX, Xie ZS (2020) Comparison of drought tolerance of banana genotypes. Genet Mol Res 19(2):gmr18544. doi.org/10.4238/gmr18544
    CrossRef
  24. Wang Z, Li G, Sun H, Ma L, Guo Y, Zhao Z, Gao H, Mei L (2018) Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and photosynthetic electron transport chain in young apple tree leaves. Biol Open 7(11):bio035279. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.035279
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Widiyanto SB, Inabuy FS, Nugraheni T, Diningrat DS, Carlson JE (2019) Transcriptome analysis of banana plantlets under polyethylene glycol induced drought stress. Unpublished Report, World Class University Program, Research and Community Service Institute, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
  26. Wintermans JFGM, De Mots A (1965) Spectrophotometric characteristics of chlorophylls a and b and their pheophytins in ethanol. Biochim Biophys Acta 109(2):448-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6585(65)90170-6
    CrossRef
  27. Zhao Y, Han Q, Ding C, Huang Y, Liao J, Chen T, Feng S, Zhou L, Zhang Z, Chen Y, Yuan S, Yuan M (2020) Effect of low temperature on chlorophyll biosynthesis and chloroplast biogenesis of rice seedlings during greening. Int J Mol Sci 21(4):1390. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041390
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef

Article

Research Article

J Plant Biotechnol 2023; 50(1): 127-136

Published online June 22, 2023 https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2023.50.016.127

Copyright © The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology.

Chlorophyll contents and expression profiles of photosynthesis-related genes in water-stressed banana plantlets

Sri Nanan Widiyanto ・Syahril Sulaiman ・Simon Duve ・Erly Marwani ・Husna Nugrahapraja ・Diky Setya Diningrat

School of Life Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
School of Life Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Medan State University, Medan 20221, Indonesia

Correspondence to:e-mail: srinanan@sith.itb.ac.id

Received: 12 March 2023; Revised: 1 May 2023; Accepted: 23 May 2023

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Water scarcity decreases the rate of photosynthesis and, consequently, the yield of banana plants (Musa spp). In this study, transcriptome analysis was performed to identify photosynthesis-related genes in banana plants and determine their expression profiles under water stress conditions. Banana plantlets were in vitro cultured on Murashige and Skoog agar medium with and without 10% polyethylene glycol and marked as BP10 and BK. Chlorophyll contents in the plant shoots were determined spectrophotometrically. Two cDNA libraries generated from BK and BP10 plantlets, respectively, were used as the reference for transcriptome data. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) and visualized using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway prediction. Morphological observations indicated that water deficiency caused chlorosis and reduced the shoot chlorophyll content of banana plantlets. GO enrichment identified 52 photosynthesis-related genes that were affected by water stress. KEGG visualization revealed the pathways related to the 52 photosynthesisrelated genes and their allocations in four GO terms. Four, 12, 15, and 21 genes were related to chlorophyll biosynthesis, the Calvin cycle, the photosynthetic electron transfer chain, and the light-harvesting complex, respectively. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis using DESeq revealed that 45 genes were down-regulated, whereas seven genes were up-regulated. Four of the down-regulated genes were responsible for chlorophyll biosynthesis and appeared to cause the decrease in the banana leaf chlorophyll content. Among the annotated DEGs, MaPNDO, MaPSAL, and MaFEDA were selected and validated using quantitative real-time PCR.

Keywords: Musa acuminata Colla, Photosynthesis, Transcriptome analysis, Water deficiency

Introduction

Bananas (Musa spp) are considered as one of major food crops since it is providing a substantial source of nutrition and food security in the world. Bananas are originated and grown well in Southeast Asia, including Indonesia. Majority of cultivated banana cultivars have arisen primarily as a result of hybridizations between M. acuminata (‘A’-genome) and M. balbisiana (‘B’-genome) which naturally resulted in various combinations of these two genomes. Most edible fruit bananas are parthenocarpy and triploids (Davey et al. 2013; Nayar 2010) with genome constitutions of AAA (dessert banana), AAB (plantains) and ABB (cooking bananas).

Banana plants are known to suffer against water deficiency, although the drought tolerance response in banana is genotype-dependent (Nansamba et al. 2020; Ravi et al. 2013). There was a tendency that banana varieties with more ‘B’ genome are more tolerant to drought stress compare to the varieties with more ‘A’ genome (Wang et al. 2020). Studies were reported to discover effects of water stress to the disruption of physiological and biochemical processes in banana. Water deficiency is known to alter the normal condition of banana plants and causes the morphological and physiological changes. Many reports showed that to prevent water loss, tolerant banana plants made various morphological adjustments, such as leaf rolling, root lengthening, leaf size reduction, and leaf abscission. Changes also occurred in the cellular level, including changes in metabolic pathway directions, nutrient and ion uptakes, synthesis of new proteins or modulation of free radical generation (Surendar et al. 2013a; Wang et al. 2020).

To improve understanding about the molecular mechanism of banana plants to respond water stress, some studies have been accomplished using the next generation sequencing (NGS) technology. Transcriptomic analysis has become a reliable approach to unravel the integrated insight into abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms occurred in banana plants (Backiyarani et al. 2015; Hu et al. 2017). Transcriptomic analysis approach was able to discover enriched differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from cDNA libraries of the tolerant and sensitive banana cultivars that exposed to drought (Muthusamy et al. 2016). In drought-stressed banana, identified DEGs were mainly involved in important bioprocesses, such as lipid metabolism, carbohydrate degradation, protein modifications, alkaloid biosynthesis and other secondary metabolites. Major biological processes were known to be influenced by water deficiency, including photosynthesis, cellular respiration, responses to stress, and organ development.

Photosynthesis seems to be the most altered by drought and is very closely related to banana growth and fruit production (Surendar et al. 2013b). Impacts of water stress on photosynthesis have been studied based on molecular perspective in various plant species. Studies discovered disturbances of water deficit condition on photosynthesis and successfully identified some responsive genes involved in photosynthesis. Water scarcity has been known to decrease not only the photosynthesis rate, but also destruct the photosystem II, causing the decline of light capture capacity (Sasi et al. 2018). It was suggested that water- stress caused stomata closure, decreases stomata conductance and resulting in diverting electrons from the photosynthetic electron transport chain to molecular oxygen generating ROS at the end of photosystem I (Chen et al. 2020). It was reported that water shortage defected the protein structures of oxygen-evolving complex of PSII and PSI reaction centers (Dalal and Tripathy 2018). However, further studies are still needed to identify the potential genes for developing DNA based markers in the future. This study was aimed to identify photosynthetic related genes of water stressed banana plantlets and determining its expression profiles based on transcriptional analysis. A transcriptome dataset was generated from cDNA libraries of banana plantlets, Musa acuminata cv Barangan Merah, which is one of the most popular banana cultivars in Indonesia that producing nutritive banana fruits (Sebayang et al. 2018). Nevertheless, as is common in M. acuminata species with A genome constitution, Barangan Merah banana is susceptible to water shortage and greatly reduces the fruit production as the impacts of insufficiency water supply. Hence, it is worthwhile to understand how severely the water stress induced alterations on photosynthesis in banana cv Barangan Merah using a molecular approach. The transcriptome dataset used in this study has been registered and submitted at the NCBI BioProject database (BioProject ID PRJNA970186).

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials

Plantlets of banana, M. acuminata cv ‘Barangan Merah’ were used in experiments as the source of samples for chlorophyll content determination and confirmation of gene expressions. Plantlets were cultured and in vitro regenerated from axillary shoots on MS agar medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) which was supplemented with 5 µM 6-Benzylaminopurine (BA). Shoots were sub- cultured every four weeks and used as explant sources for water stress treatments. To induce water deficiency condition, 10% polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000) was added into culture medium of the BP10 shoot cultures. Shoots grown on culture medium without PEG were used as the control treatment (BK). Shoots were regenerated into plantlets in four weeks. Banana in vitro cultures were placed in a controlled room at 22 ± 2°C and continuous-lighting. Six replicates were made for each treatment. After a four-week period of PEG treatments, BK and BP10 plantlets were collected for chlorophyll and RNA extractions.

Determination of Chlorophyll Content

Shoot parts were detached from plantlets of the BK and BP10 after a four-week PEG treatment and prepared for chlorophyll extraction. As much as 0.1 g shoot tissues grinded and added with two ml 96% ethanol in 4-6 minutes until all the chlorophyll was dissolved (Wintermans and De Mots, 1965). Crude extracts were filtered with filter paper Whatman No.1. Chlorophyll contents were measured using a spectrophotometer (BioRad SmartSpec™Plus) at 649 nm and 665 nm wavelengths.

Transcriptomic Analysis for GO Enrichment and DEGseq Analysis

A transcriptome dataset obtained from previous experiments was used in this study as a reference data (Widiyanto et al. 2019, unpublished report) and as it was mentioned that the sequences of transcriptome data was registered at the NCBI BioProject database. Two cDNA libraries of banana (M. acuminata cv ‘Barangan Merah’) were generated and constructed from plantlets of BK (control) and the highest- level stress treatment with the addition of 10% PEG (BP10). Transcriptomic analysis was performed to identify photosynthetic related genes and visualize its prediction pathways. The cDNA library generated from BP10 was subjected to be annotated for gene ontology (GO) enrichment and the cDNA library of BK was used to normalize. To annotate photosynthesis-related genes, the GO enrichment was accomplished using the database of DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery). The KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome) was applied to visualize photosynthetic-related gene pathways of the banana plantlets (BP10) under 10% PEG-induced water stress. The read-count data of photosynthesis-related genes were analyzed using DESeq package for determining relative expressions of annotated genes. The gene expressed numbers were normalized to the number of transcripts per million (TPM) tags (Love et al. 2014). Each unigene was grouped based on the ratio of TPM to that of the control data and further analyzed with a cut-off ratio of log10 > 2 to obtain the list of unigenes with multiples of more than 100 times compared to those of the control group (p-value ≤ 0.001).

Validation of Gene Expressions

To confirm the expressions of selected DEGs, an independent experiment was conducted to replicate a similar experiment with previous experiments when the cDNA libraries of transcriptome data were constructed. The total RNA samples were isolated from in vitro shoot cultures of the BK and BP10 banana cv Barangan Merah plantlets after four weeks of the PEG treatment. Three genes i.e., MaFEDA (2Fe-2S ferredoxin), MaPSAL (photosystem I subunit l) and MaPYROXD1 (pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase) were selected from the annotated DEGs list (Supplementary Table S.1) and subjected to qRT-PCR assay for validation of gene expressions. Primer pairs (Table 1) were designed using the Primer3Plus package, checked with the Primer Blaster, and compared to that of the banana genome available at CIRAD with the M. acuminata genome. Gene expression validation was performed using the qRT-PCR assay procedure. Total RNA samples were isolated from shoots tissues using the CTAB method (Kusdianti et al. 2016). The cDNA was constructed using the GoScriptTM Reverse Transcription System according to manufacture manual (Promega, USA). Three technical replicates were applied in the qRT-PCR assay. Gene expression data were normalized with two housekeeping genes, the MaACT and MaBT. Relative expression levels were determined using the 2-ΔΔCT method (Hu et al. 2017; Livak and Schmittgen 2001).

Table 1 . The primer sequences used for amplifying the selected (MaFEDA, MaPSAL, and MaPYROXD1), and housekeeping genes.

SymbolGene nameForward primerReverse primerAmplification length (bases)
MaACTActin (housekeeping gene)CTGACTGGCAGCAGGACATACCAAATCGTGCCTTTGAACT162
MaBTBetatubulin (housekeeping gene)AGTCCGGAGCTTCAACCTTTACGCTGACGATGGAGAAGAC221
MaFEDA2Fe-2S ferredoxinTTGCCATCTCTCCCTGTCTTGGCATTCGATCACCTTCTCT214
MaPSALphotosystem I subunit lGCATCTCACGAACACCATTGGATGGGCTGAATCACTTGGT196
MaPYROXYD1Pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductaseGCTTTCTCCAGCATCAAAGGCCCATTCCTCCTTCGACATA216

Results

Morphological Changes and Total Chlorophyll Content

Morphological observation indicated that plantlets of banana cv Barangan Merah regenerated from 10% PEG- exposed shoots (BP10) were turned pale and chlorosis after four weeks of culturing (Fig. 1). Leaves of plantlets were obviously experienced reduction of the normal growth and green coloration. In line with the morphological changes, chlorophyll determination implied that water deficiency caused a considerable reduction in total chlorophyll content (Fig. 2). Compare to that of the control plantlets (BK), total chlorophyll contents of the BP10 plantlets, as well as chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b were obviously decrease. It seemed that water deficiency experienced in banana plantlets inhibited its growth and chlorophyll biosynthesis, particularly in shoot parts.

Figure 1. Banana cv Barangan Merah plantlets cultured for four weeks in Murashige and Skoog agar medium (a) without (BK; control) and (b) with (BP10) 10% polyethylene glycol
Figure 2. The total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b contents of shoots of the control (BK) and 10% PEG-treated (BP10) plantlets

Gene Ontology Enrichment of Photosynthetic Genes

The GO enrichment was completed using DAVID and identified 52 photosynthesis-related genes that were affected by water stress in BP10 plantlets Supplementary Table S.1. The 52 photosynthetic genes were distributed in four GO terms i.e., four genes in chlorophyll biosynthesis, twelve genes in Calvin cycle pathway, fifteen genes in photosystem-electron transfer chain (PETC), and twenty- one genes in antenna light harvesting complex proteins (Table 2). The 52 identified genes were among the 100 annotated genes that either the most downregulated or upregulated in PEG treatments (PEG 2.5, PEG7, and PEG10) and listed in Supplementary Table S.2-S.3. The KEGG prediction pathway was applied to visualize the photosynthesis-related gene allocations.

Table 2 . The number of photosynthesis-related genes in water-stressed banana plantlets (categorized under four GO terms based on DAVID).

GO terminologyNumbers of genes
Biosynthesis of chlorophyll4
Calvin cycle12
Light-harvesting complex15
Photosynthetic electron transfer chain21

Total photosynthetic genes affected52


Changes in Gene Expressions in Chlorophyll Biosynthesis

Based on transcriptomic analyses there were four genes in chlorophyll biosynthesis that affected by water stress (Table 3) and mapped into KEGG pathway (Supplementary Data Fig. S.1). The four genes are MaPORA, MaPORB, MaHEMA1, and MaPYROXD1, each of them encoded for the enzyme of synthesis of protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase-A, the enzyme of protochlorophyllide oxido-reductase-B, the family protein of glutamyl-tRNA reductase, and the family protein of pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase. Prediction pathway of KEGG showed that the four affected genes were down-regulated and lowering gene expressions in porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism. Changes in gene expressions seemed to be related with the decrease of chlorophyll content in BP10 plantlets.

Table 3 . List of the four genes related to porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism whose expressions were altered under water stress (according to the KEGG prediction pathway).

Enzyme codeMusa IDSymbolGene name (encoded protein)
1.3.1.33Ma11_p01810.1MaPORAprotochlorophyllide oxidoreductase A
Ma03_p14780.1MaPORBprotochlorophyllide oxidoreductase B

1.2.1.70Ma02_p00210.1MaHEMA1glutamyl-tRNA reductase family protein

1.3.1.111Ma08_p24890.1MaPYROXD1pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase family protein


Alterations in Calvin Cycle

The Calvin cycle has three main phases, those are the carbon fixation, the reduction of carbon dioxide and regeneration of carbon dioxide acceptor phases. There were 12 identified genes in Calvin cycle that altered by water stress and were mapped into KEGG pathway. The alteration of 12 genes were illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S.2 and listed in Table 4. Based on KEGG pathway, there were seven genes up-regulated and five genes down- regulated. Water deficiency was down-regulated four genes of the 3-PGA biosynthesis in reduction phase and five genes in the RuBp regeneration phase. Water stress also interfered the expressions of transketolase (2.2.1.1) and aldolase superfamily protein (4.1.2.13) genes.

Table 4 . List of the twelve Calvin cycle-related genes whose expressions were altered by 10% PEG; seven genes were up-regulated and five genes were down-regulated.

Enzyme codeMusa IDSymbolGene name (encoded protein)
Up-regulated:

1.1.1.37Ma05_p03680.1c-NAD-MDH2lactate or malate dehydrogenase

1.2.1.12Ma06_p01470.1GAPC2glyceraldehyde-3phosphate dehydrogenase C2
Ma06_p01470.1GAPCP-1glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of plastid 1

2.6.1.2Ma11_p08770.1ALAAT2alanine aminotransferase 2

4.1.2.13Ma06_p11050.1PDE345aldolase superfamily protein (PDE345)
Ma05_p27790.1FBA8aldolase superfamily protein (FBA8)
Ma05_p27790.1FBA6aldolase superfamily protein (FBA6)

Down-regulated:

1.2.1.13Ma10_p12550.1GAPAglyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase A
Ma11_p20650.1GAPBglyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase B

2.2.1.1Ma03_p16840.1TKL2transketolase

2.7.1.19Ma05_p03450.1PRKphosphoribulo kinase

2.7.9.1Ma03_p26110.1PPDKpyruvate orthophosphate dikinase


Disturbances to Antenna and Light Harvesting Complex (LHC) Proteins

Light harvesting is the first subprocess in light-dependent reactions occurs in antenna protein complexes located in photosystems on thylakoid membranes. There were 15 genes related to light harvesting complex and antenna proteins that affected by 10% PEG treatment which were mapped into KEGG pathway (Table 5). The KEGG map showed the allocations of 15 genes in the light harvesting complex (LHC) and antenna (Supplementary Fig. S.3). Identified genes consisted of 5 light harvesting complex-a (Lhca) genes located in photosystem I and 10 light harvesting complex-b (Lhcb) genes in photosystem II. It was indicated that photosystem-II was more sensitive and had more impacts by water stress than photosystem- I.

Table 5 . List of the 15 genes related to the antenna or light-harvesting complex (LHC) whose expressions were altered under water stress; according to the KEGG pathway, there were five light-harvesting complex-a (Lhca) genes located in photosystem I and 10 light-harvesting complex-b (Lhcb) genes in photosystem II.

KEGG CodeMusa IDSymbolGene name (encoded protein)
Lhca1Ma02_p08270.1LHCA1chlorophyll a-b binding protein 6

Lhca2Ma06_p22130.1LHCA2photosystem I light-harvesting complex protein

Lhca3Ma03_p03930.1LHCA3PSI type III chlorophyll a/b-binding protein

Lhca4Ma02_p16740.1LHCA4light-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex I s.u A4

Lhcb1Ma10_p15370.1CAB1chlorophyll A/B binding protein 1
Ma02_p11170.1LHB1B1light-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex II-B1
Ma10_p15370.1LHB1B2photosystem II LHC protein-B1B2

Lhcb2Ma04_p39550.1LHCB2.1photosystem II light-harvesting complex protein 2.1
Ma04_p39550.1LHCB2.2photosystem II light-harvesting complex protein 2.2
Ma02_p11170.1LHCB2.3photosystem II light-harvesting complex protein 2.3

Lhcb3Ma09_p21570.1LHCB3light-harvesting chlorophyll B-binding protein 3

Lhcb4Ma08_p03640.1LHCB4.1light-harvesting complex photosystem II
Ma09_p02760.1LHCB4.2light-harvesting complex photosystem II

Lhcb5Ma06_p14120.2LHCB5light-harvesting complex of photosystem II 5

Lhcb6Ma07_p20600.1LHCB6light-harvesting complex photosystem II subunit 6


Disruptions to Photosystem Electron Transfer Chain (PETC)

Genes related to photosystem-electron transfer chain (PETC) that disrupted by water deficiency were mapped into KEGG pathway (Fig. 3) and listed in Supplementary Table S.1. The water stress condition was down-regulated a total of 21 genes in photosystem-electron transfer chain (PETC) that might cause changes of excitation rate of electrons. These genes composed of a gene encodes enzyme 1.18.1.2 (FNR2), two genes encode carrier proteins (DRT112 and FED A), ten genes encode photosystem I subunits, and eight genes encode photosystem II subunits (Fig. 3). Water deficiency was also disrupted the PSBO (oxygen evolving complex-1) gene, the component of photosystem II and known to play a role in water photolysis. Prediction pathway of KEGG showed that the light energy that captured by the antenna protein will be passed to the reaction center and excited the electron to a higher energy level (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Water stress-induced changes in the photosynthetic electron transfer chain (PETC) of BP10 banana plantlets. A total of 21 genes were down-regulated (marked with red stars; listed in Supplementary Table S.1)

Verification of Selected DEGs

The confirmation of gene expressions showed that compared to the control plantlet (BK), the relative expressions of MaFEDA, MaPSAL, and MaPNDO genes were obviously altered by PEG-induced water stress in BP10 plantlets (Fig. 4). Based on its relative expression values, the MaFEDA and MaPYROXD1 genes were down-regulated, whereas MaPSAL was up-regulated as responses to water stress.

Figure 4. The RT-qPCR-based expression profiles of MaFEDA, MaPYROXD1, and MaPSAL genes in the shoots of BP10 plantlets

Discussion

Water deficiency is a critical factor for the growth of banana plants and causing substantial changes in its growth, morphological features and biochemistry reactions. Chlorosis is the condition of plant tissues, especially in shoots or leaves that lost their green color and turn pale as the result of lack of chlorophyll pigment (Surendar et al. 2013b). The chlorosis occurred in leaves of 10% PEG-exposed plantlets seemed to be correlated with the disruption in chlorophyll biosynthesis process. Chlorosis in banana leaves seemed to be occurred because of the deterioration of chlorophyll and other photosynthetic pigments (Vergeiner et al. 2013). Water shortage is also known to cause the disruption of ultrastructural feature of chloroplasts in teak (Galeano et al. 2019). The transcriptomic analysis in this study would be able to discover the reason.

Water stress in banana plantlets caused the decrease in chlorophyll content up to 52% (Fig. 2). A considerable reduction in total chlorophyll contents was also noticed in banana plants under water shortage condition in the field (Surendar et al. 2013b). Water stress decreased total chlorophyll content and declined yield of banana production. Chlorophyll biosynthesis is consisting of a biochemical reaction series and catalyzed by numerous enzymes as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S.1. At least there are three distinct phases in chlorophyll biosynthesis. The first phase begins from glutamic acid metabolism pathway, including the heme biosynthesis pathway to synthesize protoporphyrin. Glutamyl-tRNA reductase family protein (1.2.1.70) enzyme encoded by the HEMA1 gene that catalyze early stages of heme biosynthesis. The second phase is the chlorophyll-a (Chla) synthesis and the photoreduction of protochlorophyllide (Pchlide) to produce chlorophyllide (Chlide) which is catalyzed by protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR) enzyme. The POR proteins are the essential enzymes in chlorophyll biosynthesis, including PORA and PORB and PORC proteins (Zhao et al. 2020). The third phase is the interconversion of Chl a and chlorophyll b (Chl b) which is catalyzed by chlorophyllide an oxygenase (CAO).

As it was mentioned, the reference transcriptome data used in this study was obtained from previous experiments (Widiyanto et al. 2019, unpublished report). The transcriptome dataset was generated from four cDNA libraries of banana plantlets using Illumina MiSeqTM 2000 platform. In experiments, banana plantlets were in vitro regenerated from shoot-buds of M. acuminata cv Barangan Merah. Polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000) at 2.5% (BP2), 7.5% (BP7), and 10% (BP10) was supplemented to induce a water shortage condition. The control (BK) plantlets were grown without PEG. Transcriptome profiling was achieved through a bioinformatics analysis flow, including the assembly, the estimation of gene abundance, the annotation, the differential expressed genes analysis, and the gene ontology (GO) enrichment. Transcriptomic profiles indicated there were 3,351 genes altered by water stress which were covering 113 terminologies in biological processes. Statistical analysis identified 1,744 genes as differentially expressed (DEGs) under PEG treatment in which 1,046 genes of them were mapped to the reference genomes, Musa acuminata cv Pahang at CIRAD. These DEGs were distributed in 26 functional clusters. Among those genes, 233 annotated genes, were consistently downregulated in all PEG treatments and 100 genes of them were listed in Supplementary Data Table S.3. Conversely, 762 genes were persistently upregulated. A total of 100 genes with the highest expression level that enhanced by at least thousand times were listed in Supplementary Data Table S.4. However, transcriptomic analysis has not been thoroughly unraveled to discover the impacts of water stress treatments to any major bioprocess in details, specifically photosynthesis. In this study, further transcriptomic analysis was directed to reveal how water stress altered and disrupted particularly in photosynthesis pathway and its apparatus. The highest level of stress (10% PEG) was taken into consideration as it seemed to generate severe impacts on banana plantlet’s growth.

Correspondingly with the results of this study, KEGG mapping showed that in BP10 plantlets, water stress down-regulated the MaPORA, MaPORB, and MaHEMA1 genes and caused to depress the biosynthesis of its encoded enzymes. Changes in level expressions of enzymes in porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism seemed to cause the decrease of chlorophyll biosynthesis in BP10 plantlets. Water stress was also down-regulated the MaPYROXD1 gene that is known to play a role in the biosynthesis of chlorophyll and also involved in terpenoid backbones biosynthesis in plant cells. Alterations of gene expressions that responsible for chlorophyll biosynthesis seemed to cause the decrease of chlorophyll content in leaf tissues of banana plantlets exposed to PEG. Similar result in rice seedling and potato that drought stress also changed the expressions of PORA and PORB genes (Chen et al. 2020; Nguyen et al. 2021).

The three main stages of Calvin cycle reactions are connected processes to each other. Changes in expression levels of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (1.2.1.12 and 1.2.1.13) genes at the 3-phosphoglyceric acid (PGA) reduction phase will affect the formation of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (GAPC), which can interfere the regeneration process of ribulose biphosphate (RuBP) and consequently will disturb the formation of glucose. Changes the expression levels of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenases (1.2.1.12 and 1.2.1.13) genes seemed to affect four of the six stages of RuBP regeneration, and hence will disrupt the CO2 fixation process. Although drought stress did not affect gene expression related to CO2 fixation directly, but changes in gene expression related to RuBp regeneration will also interfere the CO2 fixation process. Comparably, in rice seedling, the addition of PEG also declined the efficiency activity of Rubisco and reduced the activity of other enzymes of the carbon fixation pathway. Further analysis revealed the down- regulation of proteins involved in carbon reduction reactions, such as rubisco, triose-phosphate-isomerase (TPI), fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase, sedoheptulose-1, 7-bisphophatase, and phosphoglycerate kinase (Dalal and Tripathy 2018).

In potato, dehydration was evidently reflected drought- responsive genes related to the alteration of the chloroplast structure (Chen et al. 2020). Water stress has been known to decrease the capacity of light capture, especially in C3 plants. It was indicated that photosystem II (PSII) was more disturbed by water stress than photosystem I (PSI), and it means that LHCB gene seemed to be more sensitive than LHCA. Similar results in rice seedling, water-stress obviously decreased the light absorption by antennae and also reduced the rates of electron transport (Dalal and Tripathy 2018). In Arabidopsis, the absence of one of the LHCA1/LHCA4 and LHCA3/LHCA2 dimers caused structural changes that unable to be replaced by other LHCA proteins. Loss of functions of LHCB1 and LHCB2 will lead to reduce light absorption, while loss of function of LHCB5 and LHCB6 will induce declining the efficiency of energy transfer from LHCB to PSII reaction center (Sasi et al. 2018).

Drought stress known to cause disruption of functions of structural and carrier proteins and also decrease the excitation rate of electrons at the reaction center of photosystems. Changes in expression levels of structural protein genes in the reaction center seemed not directly to cause loss of its functions (Wada et al. 2019). Our result showed that among genes related to photosystem-electron transfer chain there was one gene encodes enzyme 1.18.1.2 (FNR2) that disrupted by water stress (Fig. 3), and has been known to cause immediate obstruction at the end of electron transfer process. The disruption of FNR2 enzyme will inhibit NADPH production, which plays an important role as the source of energy in carbon dioxide assimilation of the Calvin cycle, nitrogen-lipid metabolism, chlorophyll biosynthesis and regulation of stromal redox (Li et al. 2017). Water deficiency was also known to downsize the light-harvesting antenna complex to protect from photo- oxidative damage and inducing the reduction of photosynthetic electron transport process. Similar results were reported in rice and potato seedlings (Dalal and Tripathy 2018). Disturbances of drought to photosynthetic electron transport process and damage both PSII and PSI reaction centers had been reported in many plants, including young apple tree (Wang et al. 2018).

Conclusion

This study showed that the addition of 10% PEG induced water deficiency condition in banana plantlets and evidently affected not only chlorophyll biosynthesis, but also altered the biochemical reactions in Calvin cycle, disturbed the light-harvesting capacity and disrupted the electron transfer process in photosystem chains. Water deficiency made impacts to the expressions of 52 genes related to photosynthesis process of M. acuminata Colla cv ‘Barangan Merah’ plantlets. The 52 genes were allocated in chlorophyll biosynthesis (4 genes), in Calvin cycle (9 genes), in light harvesting complex (15 genes), and in electron transfer- photosystem chain (21 genes). Based on relative gene expression values of the 52 genes showed that a total of 45 genes were down-regulated, and 8 genes were up-regulated. Results of transcriptomic analysis in this study will be useful for developing drought-resistant banana plants in the future.

Author’s Contributions

SNW: Conceptualization, research supervision, writing of original draft manuscript; SS & SD: Methodology, formal analysis, research investigation; EM & HN: Visualization, review and editing of manuscript; FSI: Data curation, formal analysis; DSD: Critically review and editing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the research.

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by: the Master Degree to Doctoral Scholarship Program for Excellence Undergraduate (PMDSU), Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of National Education, Indonesia (2019-2020); and the Program of Research, Community Service, and Innovation (2020-2021), School of Life Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia.

Supplemental Materials

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Banana cv Barangan Merah plantlets cultured for four weeks in Murashige and Skoog agar medium (a) without (BK; control) and (b) with (BP10) 10% polyethylene glycol
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2023; 50: 127-136https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2023.50.016.127

Fig 2.

Figure 2.The total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b contents of shoots of the control (BK) and 10% PEG-treated (BP10) plantlets
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2023; 50: 127-136https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2023.50.016.127

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Water stress-induced changes in the photosynthetic electron transfer chain (PETC) of BP10 banana plantlets. A total of 21 genes were down-regulated (marked with red stars; listed in Supplementary Table S.1)
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2023; 50: 127-136https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2023.50.016.127

Fig 4.

Figure 4.The RT-qPCR-based expression profiles of MaFEDA, MaPYROXD1, and MaPSAL genes in the shoots of BP10 plantlets
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2023; 50: 127-136https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2023.50.016.127

Table 1 . The primer sequences used for amplifying the selected (MaFEDA, MaPSAL, and MaPYROXD1), and housekeeping genes.

SymbolGene nameForward primerReverse primerAmplification length (bases)
MaACTActin (housekeeping gene)CTGACTGGCAGCAGGACATACCAAATCGTGCCTTTGAACT162
MaBTBetatubulin (housekeeping gene)AGTCCGGAGCTTCAACCTTTACGCTGACGATGGAGAAGAC221
MaFEDA2Fe-2S ferredoxinTTGCCATCTCTCCCTGTCTTGGCATTCGATCACCTTCTCT214
MaPSALphotosystem I subunit lGCATCTCACGAACACCATTGGATGGGCTGAATCACTTGGT196
MaPYROXYD1Pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductaseGCTTTCTCCAGCATCAAAGGCCCATTCCTCCTTCGACATA216

Table 2 . The number of photosynthesis-related genes in water-stressed banana plantlets (categorized under four GO terms based on DAVID).

GO terminologyNumbers of genes
Biosynthesis of chlorophyll4
Calvin cycle12
Light-harvesting complex15
Photosynthetic electron transfer chain21

Total photosynthetic genes affected52

Table 3 . List of the four genes related to porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism whose expressions were altered under water stress (according to the KEGG prediction pathway).

Enzyme codeMusa IDSymbolGene name (encoded protein)
1.3.1.33Ma11_p01810.1MaPORAprotochlorophyllide oxidoreductase A
Ma03_p14780.1MaPORBprotochlorophyllide oxidoreductase B

1.2.1.70Ma02_p00210.1MaHEMA1glutamyl-tRNA reductase family protein

1.3.1.111Ma08_p24890.1MaPYROXD1pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase family protein

Table 4 . List of the twelve Calvin cycle-related genes whose expressions were altered by 10% PEG; seven genes were up-regulated and five genes were down-regulated.

Enzyme codeMusa IDSymbolGene name (encoded protein)
Up-regulated:

1.1.1.37Ma05_p03680.1c-NAD-MDH2lactate or malate dehydrogenase

1.2.1.12Ma06_p01470.1GAPC2glyceraldehyde-3phosphate dehydrogenase C2
Ma06_p01470.1GAPCP-1glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of plastid 1

2.6.1.2Ma11_p08770.1ALAAT2alanine aminotransferase 2

4.1.2.13Ma06_p11050.1PDE345aldolase superfamily protein (PDE345)
Ma05_p27790.1FBA8aldolase superfamily protein (FBA8)
Ma05_p27790.1FBA6aldolase superfamily protein (FBA6)

Down-regulated:

1.2.1.13Ma10_p12550.1GAPAglyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase A
Ma11_p20650.1GAPBglyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase B

2.2.1.1Ma03_p16840.1TKL2transketolase

2.7.1.19Ma05_p03450.1PRKphosphoribulo kinase

2.7.9.1Ma03_p26110.1PPDKpyruvate orthophosphate dikinase

Table 5 . List of the 15 genes related to the antenna or light-harvesting complex (LHC) whose expressions were altered under water stress; according to the KEGG pathway, there were five light-harvesting complex-a (Lhca) genes located in photosystem I and 10 light-harvesting complex-b (Lhcb) genes in photosystem II.

KEGG CodeMusa IDSymbolGene name (encoded protein)
Lhca1Ma02_p08270.1LHCA1chlorophyll a-b binding protein 6

Lhca2Ma06_p22130.1LHCA2photosystem I light-harvesting complex protein

Lhca3Ma03_p03930.1LHCA3PSI type III chlorophyll a/b-binding protein

Lhca4Ma02_p16740.1LHCA4light-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex I s.u A4

Lhcb1Ma10_p15370.1CAB1chlorophyll A/B binding protein 1
Ma02_p11170.1LHB1B1light-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex II-B1
Ma10_p15370.1LHB1B2photosystem II LHC protein-B1B2

Lhcb2Ma04_p39550.1LHCB2.1photosystem II light-harvesting complex protein 2.1
Ma04_p39550.1LHCB2.2photosystem II light-harvesting complex protein 2.2
Ma02_p11170.1LHCB2.3photosystem II light-harvesting complex protein 2.3

Lhcb3Ma09_p21570.1LHCB3light-harvesting chlorophyll B-binding protein 3

Lhcb4Ma08_p03640.1LHCB4.1light-harvesting complex photosystem II
Ma09_p02760.1LHCB4.2light-harvesting complex photosystem II

Lhcb5Ma06_p14120.2LHCB5light-harvesting complex of photosystem II 5

Lhcb6Ma07_p20600.1LHCB6light-harvesting complex photosystem II subunit 6

References

  1. Backiyarani S, Uma S, Saraswathu MS, Saravanakumar AS, Chandrasekar A (2015) Transcriptome analysis of banana (Musa balbisiana) based on next-generation sequencing technology. Turk J Agric For 39(5):705-717. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1406-171
    CrossRef
  2. Chen Y, Li C, Yi J, Yang Y, Lei C, Gong M (2020) Transcriptome response to drought, rehydration and re-dehydration in potato. Int J Mol Sci 21(1):159. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21010159
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Dalal VK, Tripathy BC (2018). Water-stress induced downsizing of light-harvesting antenna complex protects developing rice seedlings from photo-oxidative damage. Sci Rep 8:5955. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14419-4
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Davey MW, Gudimella R, Harikrishna JA, Sin LW, Khalid N, Keulemans J (2013) A draft Musa balbisiana genome sequence for molecular genetics in polyploid, inter- and intra-specific Musa hybrids. Genomics 14(683):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-683
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Galeano E, Vasconcelos TS, Novais de Oliveira P, Carrer H (2019) Physiological and molecular responses to drought stress in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). PLoS ONE 14(9):e0221571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221571
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Hu W, Ding Z, Tie W, Yan Y, Liu Y, Wu C, Liu J, Wang J, Peng M, Xu B, Jin Z (2017) Comparative physiological and transcriptomic analyses provide integrated insight into osmotic, cold, and salt stress tolerance mechanisms in banana. Sci Rep 7:e43007. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43007
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Kusdianti, Diningrat DS, Iriawati, Widiyanto SN (2016) P5CS and HSP 81-2 gene expression profile of banana (Musa acuminata) in vitro culture under salt stress condition. J Plant Sci 11(4):91-95. https://doi.org/10.3923/jps.2016.91.95
    CrossRef
  8. Li J, Cang Z, Jiao F, Bai X, Zhang D, Zhai R (2017) Influence of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and protective enzymes of potato at seedling stage. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 16(1):82-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2015.03.001
    CrossRef
  9. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using realtime quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25(4):402-408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15(550):1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plantarum 15:473-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
    CrossRef
  12. Muthusamy M, Uma S, Backiyarani S, Saraswathi MS, Chandrasekar A (2016) Transcriptomic changes of drought-tolerant and sensitive banana cultivars exposed to drought stress. Front Plant Sci 7:e1609. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01609
    CrossRef
  13. Nansamba M, Sibiya J, Tumuhimbise R, Karamura D, Kubiriba J, Karamura E (2020) Breeding banana (Musa spp.) for drought tolerance: A review. Plant Breed 139(4):685-696. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12812
    CrossRef
  14. Nayar NM (2010) The Bananas: Botany, Origin, Dispersal. In: Horticultural Reviews Vol. 36, Janick, J. (Ed). Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, New Jersey, US. pp 117-164. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470527238.ch2
    CrossRef
  15. Nguyen MK, Shih TH, Lin S-H, Lin J-W, Nguyen HC, Yang ZW, Yang CM (2021) Transcription profile analysis of chlorophyll biosynthesis in leaves of wild-type and chlorophyll b deficient rice (Oryza sativa L.). Agriculture 11:e401. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11050401
    CrossRef
  16. Ravi I, Uma S, Vaganan MM, Mustaffa MM (2013) Phenotyping bananas for drought resistance. Front Physiol 4(9):1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00009
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Sasi S, Venkatesh J, Daneshi R, Gururani MA (2018) Photosystem II extrinsic proteins and their putative role in abiotic stress tolerance in higher plants. Plants 7(4):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7040100
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Sebayang NS, Puspita DE, Basri S (2018) Different planting media in Barangan banana (Musa Acuminata Colla) breeding in Southeast Aceh. Indonesian J Agric Res 1(3):307-316. https://doi.org/10.32734/injar.v1i3.473
    CrossRef
  19. Surendar KK, Devi DD, Ravi I, Krishnakumar S, Kumar SR, Velayudham K (2013a) Water stress in banana - A review. Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci 2(6):1-18. https://bepls.com/may2013/1.pdf
  20. Surendar KK, Devi DD, Ravi I, Jeyakumar P, Velayudham K (2013b) Water stress affects plant relative water content, soluble protein, total chlorophyll content and yield of ratoon banana. Int J Hort 3:96-103. https://doi.org/10.5376/ijh.2013.03.0017
    CrossRef
  21. Vergeiner C, Banala S, Krautler B (2013) Chlorophyll breakdown in senescent banana leaves: Catabolism reprogrammed for biosynthesis of persistent blue fluorescent tetrapyrroles. Chem Eur J 19:12294-12305. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201301907
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Wada S, Takagi D, Miyake C, Makino A, Suzuki Y (2019) Responses of the photosynthetic electron transport reactions stimulate the oxidation of the reaction center chlorophyll of photosystem I P700, under drought and high temperatures in rice. Int J Mol Sci 20(9):2068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092068
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Wang R, Xu Y, Li XG, Shen Y, Wang LX, Xie ZS (2020) Comparison of drought tolerance of banana genotypes. Genet Mol Res 19(2):gmr18544. doi.org/10.4238/gmr18544
    CrossRef
  24. Wang Z, Li G, Sun H, Ma L, Guo Y, Zhao Z, Gao H, Mei L (2018) Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and photosynthetic electron transport chain in young apple tree leaves. Biol Open 7(11):bio035279. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.035279
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  25. Widiyanto SB, Inabuy FS, Nugraheni T, Diningrat DS, Carlson JE (2019) Transcriptome analysis of banana plantlets under polyethylene glycol induced drought stress. Unpublished Report, World Class University Program, Research and Community Service Institute, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
  26. Wintermans JFGM, De Mots A (1965) Spectrophotometric characteristics of chlorophylls a and b and their pheophytins in ethanol. Biochim Biophys Acta 109(2):448-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6585(65)90170-6
    CrossRef
  27. Zhao Y, Han Q, Ding C, Huang Y, Liao J, Chen T, Feng S, Zhou L, Zhang Z, Chen Y, Yuan S, Yuan M (2020) Effect of low temperature on chlorophyll biosynthesis and chloroplast biogenesis of rice seedlings during greening. Int J Mol Sci 21(4):1390. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041390
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
JPB
Vol 51. 2024

Supplementary File

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in JPB

Journal of

Plant Biotechnology

pISSN 1229-2818
eISSN 2384-1397
qr-code Download