Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2016; 43(1): 138-145
Published online March 31, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2016.43.1.138
© The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology
Correspondence to : e-mail: yshuh2@korea.kr
To find the optimal propagation condition for endangered
Keywords Lady’s slipper orchid, Asymbiotic seed culture, Organic amendments, Germination, Seedling growth
Members of the
Orchids produce a number of minute seeds but they have low propagation rate in nature, because ovules are not present or poorly developed at the time of anthesis, and endosperms which contain sufficient nutrient reserves for germination are absent from mature seeds. Therefore, asymbiotic germination has been a beneficial and common technique for micropropagation of orchids (Arditti 1967). However,
Growth and morphogenesis of plant tissues can be promoted by the addition of various organic supplements and plant extracts (Fonnesbech 1972). Many organic additives including coconut water, banana powder, the bleeding sap of birch trees, peptone, tomato juice, honey, date palm syrup, corn extract, papaya extract and beef extract have been used effectively for enhancing the development of cultured cells and tissues, though they have undefined mixture of organic nutrients and growth factors (Islam et al. 2003; Murdad et al. 2010). Actually a large number of organic amendments were used successfully for orchid production (Arditti 1967; Arditti et al. 1990; Islam et al. 2003; Pyati et al. 2002). Therefore we tried to find the effect of various organic additives on
Seeds from surface-sterilized capsules were sown on each basal medium with different organic additives including coconut water (0, 50, 100, 200 ml·L-1, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), birch sap (0, 50, 100, 200 ml·L-1), maple sap (0, 50, 100, 200 ml·L-1), banana powder (0, 15, 30, 60 g·L-1, MBcell, USA) and peptone (0, 1, 2, 4 g·L-1, MBcell, USA). Saps were obtained from the birch (
Sugar contents were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a refractive index detector (Agilent 1100 series, Agilent, USA) using ZORBAX carbohydrate analysis column (4.6×150 mm, Agilent, USA). A mobile phase consisting of 75% acetronitrile was used at a flow rate of 1.0 ml·min-1. Among inorganic ion contents, the cations such as K+, Mg2+ and Ca2+ were analyzed by HPLC with a conductivity detector (Breeze HPLC, Waters, USA) on IC-Par CM/D column (3.9×50 mm, Waters, USA, eluent: 0.5 mM EDTA / 2 mM HNO3), and the anions such as NO3- and SO4- were analyzed using IC-Par anion HR column (4.6×7 5mm, Waters, USA, eluent: 1.6 mM NaHCO3 / 1.4 mM Na2CO3). According to the published methods (Amin and Reusch 1987), vitamin B and C group were measured by HPLC with diode array detector (Agilent 1100 series, Agilent, USA) using ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C-18 column (4.6×150 mm, Agilent), its mobile phase channel A was 25 mM NaH2PO4 (pH 2.5), and mobile phase channel B was methanol at a flow rate of 1.0 ml·min-1. Organic acids were also analyzed by HPLC with refractive index detector (Agilent 1100 series, Agilent, USA) using Hi-Plex H column (7.7×300 mm, Agilent), and its mobile phase was 0.004 M H2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.4 mL·min-1. Endogenous plant hormones such as indole acetic acid (IAA), trans-zeatin riboside (trans-ZR) and abscisic acid (ABA) were measured according to the methods described by Nakurte et al (2012). They were analyzed with a modular HPLC system with UV and fluorescence detectors (Agilent 1100 series, Agilent, USA) using a reverse-phase Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C8 column (4.6×150 mm, Agilent, USA), its mobile phase was methanol containing 1% acetic acid (60 : 40 v/v) in isocratic mode at a flow rate of 1 ml·min-1.
Data from each experiment were subjected to Two-way ANOVA and Duncan`s multiple range test using SAS program (Version 6.21, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Table 1 showed the nutrient components of coconut water, birch sap and maple sap. All of them contained around 2.5% sugars which were almost composed of sucrose, glucose and fructose. Sucrose was the main sugar type in coconut water and maple sap, on the other hand, birch sap was mostly composed of fructose and glucose. They possessed variable inorganic ions such as potassium (K), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn). Water-soluble vitamins such as thiamin (VB1), riboflavin (VB2), niacin (VB3), pantothenic acid (VB5), pyridoxine (VB6), myo-inositol and ascorbic acid (VC), which were recommended for orchid growth, were also detected in coconut water and maple sap. But they were not detected in birch sap, except for ascorbic acid. Organic acids including citric, malic and succinic acid were contained in three organic additives. Phytohormones such as IAA, trans-ZR and ABA were detected only in coconut water.
Table 1 . Comparison of nutrient constituents in coconut water, birch and maple sap added to the culture medium
Nutrient constituents | Coconut water (100g) | Birch sap (100g) | Maple sap (100g) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sugars (g) | Total | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.8 |
Sucrose | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.3 | |
Glucose | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | |
Fructose | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.2 | |
Inorganic ions (mg) | Ca2+ | 24.2 | 58.6 | 63.4 |
Fe3+ | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.6 | |
Mg2+ | 25.3 | 11.3 | 14.5 | |
PO43- | 20.4 | 6.4 | 2.7 | |
K+ | 242.1 | 120.4 | 204.2 | |
Mn2+ | 0.1 | 1.1 | 3.3 | |
Cu2+ | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.7 | |
Na+ | 36.5 | 5.3 | 10.4 | |
SO42- | 21.4 | 31.2 | 38.8 | |
NO3- | 2.8 | 3.1 | 3.5 | |
Vitamins (mg) | Thiamin (VB1) | 0.03 | - | 0.01 |
Riboflavin (VB2) | 0.05 | - | 0.01 | |
Niacin (VB3) | 0.08 | - | 0.03 | |
Pantothenic acid (VB5) | 0.04 | - | 0.03 | |
Pyridoxine (VB6) | 0.03 | - | 0.002 | |
Myo-inositol | 0.01 | - | - | |
Ascorbic acid (VC) | 2.4 | 0.3 | 0.9 | |
Organic acids (mg) | Malic | 289.3 | 359.1 | 141.7 |
Citric | 23.7 | 6.8 | 15.0 | |
Succinic | 8.4 | 11.5 | 12.2 | |
Phytohormones (nM) | IAA | 25.6 | - | - |
trans-ZR | 10.2 | - | - | |
ABA | 8.5 | - | - |
Table 2 explained the different effects of each organic additives on
Table 2 . Effects of organic additives on
Organic additives | Germination (%) | Protocorm formation (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Type (A) | Conc. (B) | ||
Coconut water | 0 ml·L-1 | 12.6 gz | 14.4 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 60.9 b | 62.0 b | |
100 ml·L-1 | 70.8 a | 74.2 a | |
200 ml·L-1 | 64.4 ab | 60.8 b | |
Birch sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 12.8 g | 13.1 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 55.8 c | 62.1 b | |
100 ml·L-1 | 65.2 ab | 68.2 ab | |
200 ml·L-1 | 56.9 c | 53.4 bc | |
Maple sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 10.9 g | 12.7 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 59.1 b | 60.5 b | |
100 ml·L-1 | 66.4 ab | 66.9 ab | |
200 ml·L-1 | 61.1 b | 61.4 b | |
Banana powder | 0 g·L-1 | 11.1 g | 12.2 e |
15 g·L-1 | 25.5 f | 21.3 de | |
30 g·L-1 | 30.6 ef | 35.4 d | |
60 g·L-1 | 36.8 e | 41.9 c | |
Peptone | 0 g·L-1 | 9.6 g | 10.3 e |
1 g·L-1 | 35.2 e | 38.2 cd | |
2 g·L-1 | 43.3 d | 43.7 c | |
4 g·L-1 | 40.9 d | 35.0 d | |
Significancey | |||
A | ** | ** | |
B | ** | ** | |
A×B | ** | ** |
zMean separation by Duncan’s multiple range test at
yNS, *, ** not significant or significant at
Table 3 . Effects of organic additives on the fresh and dry weight of seedlings developed from
Organic additives | Fresh weight (mg) | Dry weight (mg) | |
---|---|---|---|
Type (A) | Conc. (B) | ||
Coconut water | 0 ml·L-1 | 76.8 ez | 7.8 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 228.1 b | 24.2 bc | |
100 ml·L-1 | 296.4 a | 34.1 a | |
200 ml·L-1 | 221.9 b | 23.7 bc | |
Birch sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 65.3 e | 6.4 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 210.3 c | 21.9 c | |
100 ml·L-1 | 260.5 ab | 28.7 ab | |
200 ml·L-1 | 205.6 c | 22.0 c | |
Maple sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 71.4 e | 6.9 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 207.6 c | 22.4 c | |
100 ml·L-1 | 273.2 ab | 30.9 ab | |
200 ml·L-1 | 231.7 b | 25.5 b | |
Banana powder | 0 g·L-1 | 72.9 e | 7.2 e |
15 g·L-1 | 126.7 d | 13.3 d | |
30 g·L-1 | 178.4 cd | 18.6 cd | |
60 g·L-1 | 168.6 cd | 16.9 cd | |
Peptone | 0 g·L-1 | 68.4 e | 6.8 e |
1 g·L-1 | 135.1 d | 14.3 d | |
2 g·L-1 | 169.9 cd | 18.0 cd | |
4 g·L-1 | 173.3 cd | 18.2 cd | |
Significancey | |||
A | ** | ** | |
B | ** | ** | |
A×B | ** | ** |
zMean separation by Duncan’s multiple range test at
yNS, *, ** not significant or significant at
Table 4 . Effects of organic additives on the growth of seedlings developed from protocorm of
Organic additives | Root | Bud | |||||||
Type (A) | Conc. (B) | No. | Length (cm) | Diameter (mm) | Formation (%) | Length (cm) | Diameter (mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coconut water | 0 ml·L-1 | 3.1 d | 1.0 d | 1.0 a | 20.2 gz | 3.7 e | 1.4 b | ||
50 ml·L-1 | 6.7 ab | 2.7 b | 0.9 a | 62.5 c | 6.8 b | 2.0 a | |||
100 ml·L-1 | 7.1 a | 2.9 ab | 0.9 a | 74.6 a | 8.0 a | 2.1 a | |||
200 ml·L-1 | 7.0 a | 2.8 ab | 0.9 a | 69.5 abc | 8.1 a | 2.1 a | |||
Birch sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 3.2 d | 0.9 d | 0.8 a | 23.9 g | 3.9 e | 1.4 b | ||
50 ml·L-1 | 5.9 b | 2.6 b | 0.9 a | 57.1 cd | 6.4 bc | 1.7 ab | |||
100 ml·L-1 | 6.6 ab | 3.0 ab | 1.0 a | 70.4 ab | 7.8 a | 2.2 a | |||
200 ml·L-1 | 6.1 b | 2.7 b | 0.9 a | 67.3 b | 7.4 ab | 2.0 a | |||
Maple sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 3.2 d | 1.1 d | 1.0 a | 23.0 g | 3.5 e | 1.4 b | ||
50 ml·L-1 | 5.4 c | 2.5 b | 0.8 a | 61.1 c | 7.0 b | 1.6 ab | |||
100 ml·L-1 | 6.7 ab | 3.3 a | 0.9 a | 73.5 a | 7.9 a | 2.1 a | |||
200 ml·L-1 | 6.6 ab | 2.9 ab | 0.9 a | 68.0 b | 7.8 a | 2.1 a | |||
Banana powder | 0 g·L-1 | 3.0 d | 1.4 cd | 0.8 a | 21.3 g | 3.4 e | 1.3 b | ||
15 g·L-1 | 4.0 cd | 1.8 c | 1.0 a | 31.5 f | 4.2 de | 1.5 ab | |||
30 g·L-1 | 5.2 c | 2.1 bc | 1.0 a | 36.9 ef | 4.4 de | 1.6 ab | |||
60 g·L-1 | 4.6 cd | 1.7 c | 0.9 a | 29.0 f | 5.3 d | 1.5 ab | |||
Peptone | 0 g·L-1 | 2.8 d | 1.2 d | 1.0 a | 21.0 g | 3.7 e | 1.3 b | ||
1 g·L-1 | 4.4 cd | 1.9 c | 0.9 a | 44.2 e | 5.2 d | 1.6 ab | |||
2 g·L-1 | 5.1 c | 2.3 bc | 0.8 a | 56.8 cd | 6.0 c | 2.0 a | |||
4 g·L-1 | 4.5 cd | 1.9 c | 0.8 a | 52.6 d | 5.3 d | 1.9 a | |||
Significancey | |||||||||
A | ** | ** | NS | ** | ** | * | |||
B | * | ** | NS | ** | ** | * | |||
A×B | * | * | NS | ** | ** | NS |
zMean separation by Duncan’s multiple range test at
yNS, *, ** not significant or significant at
particular, the bud formation rates were raised up to 70%, and their length and diameter also increased by 2 and 1.5 times respectively. Similarly, the number and length of roots increased by 2 and 3 times individually. It was found that 100 ml·L-1 of coconut water or phloem sap showed the best response to the germination and protocorm development in the quarter-strength MS basal medium supplemented with 10 g·L-1 sucrose. The optimal osmotic potential should be maintained in culture medium for the successful
Morphology of seedlings developed from protocorms of
It is one of the advisable methods to use organic additives in orchid culture medium, because they have been reported to be an easy way to improvise the current plant tissue culture media towards commercial production (Ichihashi and Islam, 1999). As organic additives, coconut water, apple homogenate, banana homogenate, potato homogenate, date palm syrup, corn extract, papaya extract, beef extract, casein hydrolysate, pineapple extract, yeast extract, tryptone, peptone or pure amino acids such as glutamine were used successfully in orchid production (Islam et al. 2003; Murdad et al. 2010; Pyati et al. 2002; Rasmussen 1995). They possess a wide spectrum of growth factors, resulting in the beneficial effects producing more PLBs, shoots and leaves (Akter et al. 2007), increasing the size of somatic embryos (Al-Khateeb 2008) and promoting the development of asymbiotic seeds as well as regeneration of plantlets (Tawaro et al. 2008).
Coconut water was reported to promote the development of orchid tubers and roots (Mclntyre et al. 1974; Rasmussen 1995). 100 ml·L-1 coconut water extracted from a fully ripe coconut could induce the germination of
Coconut water is the colorless liquid endosperm of green coconuts (
In conclusion, our results demonstrated that the organic additives including the phloem sap such as birch and maple sap as well as coconut water could promote the seed germination, increase the protocorm formation and led the vigorous seedling growth of
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2016; 43(1): 138-145
Published online March 31, 2016 https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2016.43.1.138
Copyright © The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology.
Yoon Sun Huh1,*, Joung Kwan Lee1, Sang Young Nam1, Kee Yoeup Paek2, and Gang Uk Suh3
1Horticultural Research Division, Chungcheongbuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services, Cheongju, 28130, Korea,
2Department of Horticultural Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Korea,
3Plant Conservation Division, Korea National Arboretum of the Korea Forest Service, Pocheon, 11186, Korea
Correspondence to: e-mail: yshuh2@korea.kr
To find the optimal propagation condition for endangered
Keywords: Lady’s slipper orchid, Asymbiotic seed culture, Organic amendments, Germination, Seedling growth
Members of the
Orchids produce a number of minute seeds but they have low propagation rate in nature, because ovules are not present or poorly developed at the time of anthesis, and endosperms which contain sufficient nutrient reserves for germination are absent from mature seeds. Therefore, asymbiotic germination has been a beneficial and common technique for micropropagation of orchids (Arditti 1967). However,
Growth and morphogenesis of plant tissues can be promoted by the addition of various organic supplements and plant extracts (Fonnesbech 1972). Many organic additives including coconut water, banana powder, the bleeding sap of birch trees, peptone, tomato juice, honey, date palm syrup, corn extract, papaya extract and beef extract have been used effectively for enhancing the development of cultured cells and tissues, though they have undefined mixture of organic nutrients and growth factors (Islam et al. 2003; Murdad et al. 2010). Actually a large number of organic amendments were used successfully for orchid production (Arditti 1967; Arditti et al. 1990; Islam et al. 2003; Pyati et al. 2002). Therefore we tried to find the effect of various organic additives on
Seeds from surface-sterilized capsules were sown on each basal medium with different organic additives including coconut water (0, 50, 100, 200 ml·L-1, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), birch sap (0, 50, 100, 200 ml·L-1), maple sap (0, 50, 100, 200 ml·L-1), banana powder (0, 15, 30, 60 g·L-1, MBcell, USA) and peptone (0, 1, 2, 4 g·L-1, MBcell, USA). Saps were obtained from the birch (
Sugar contents were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a refractive index detector (Agilent 1100 series, Agilent, USA) using ZORBAX carbohydrate analysis column (4.6×150 mm, Agilent, USA). A mobile phase consisting of 75% acetronitrile was used at a flow rate of 1.0 ml·min-1. Among inorganic ion contents, the cations such as K+, Mg2+ and Ca2+ were analyzed by HPLC with a conductivity detector (Breeze HPLC, Waters, USA) on IC-Par CM/D column (3.9×50 mm, Waters, USA, eluent: 0.5 mM EDTA / 2 mM HNO3), and the anions such as NO3- and SO4- were analyzed using IC-Par anion HR column (4.6×7 5mm, Waters, USA, eluent: 1.6 mM NaHCO3 / 1.4 mM Na2CO3). According to the published methods (Amin and Reusch 1987), vitamin B and C group were measured by HPLC with diode array detector (Agilent 1100 series, Agilent, USA) using ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C-18 column (4.6×150 mm, Agilent), its mobile phase channel A was 25 mM NaH2PO4 (pH 2.5), and mobile phase channel B was methanol at a flow rate of 1.0 ml·min-1. Organic acids were also analyzed by HPLC with refractive index detector (Agilent 1100 series, Agilent, USA) using Hi-Plex H column (7.7×300 mm, Agilent), and its mobile phase was 0.004 M H2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.4 mL·min-1. Endogenous plant hormones such as indole acetic acid (IAA), trans-zeatin riboside (trans-ZR) and abscisic acid (ABA) were measured according to the methods described by Nakurte et al (2012). They were analyzed with a modular HPLC system with UV and fluorescence detectors (Agilent 1100 series, Agilent, USA) using a reverse-phase Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C8 column (4.6×150 mm, Agilent, USA), its mobile phase was methanol containing 1% acetic acid (60 : 40 v/v) in isocratic mode at a flow rate of 1 ml·min-1.
Data from each experiment were subjected to Two-way ANOVA and Duncan`s multiple range test using SAS program (Version 6.21, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Table 1 showed the nutrient components of coconut water, birch sap and maple sap. All of them contained around 2.5% sugars which were almost composed of sucrose, glucose and fructose. Sucrose was the main sugar type in coconut water and maple sap, on the other hand, birch sap was mostly composed of fructose and glucose. They possessed variable inorganic ions such as potassium (K), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn). Water-soluble vitamins such as thiamin (VB1), riboflavin (VB2), niacin (VB3), pantothenic acid (VB5), pyridoxine (VB6), myo-inositol and ascorbic acid (VC), which were recommended for orchid growth, were also detected in coconut water and maple sap. But they were not detected in birch sap, except for ascorbic acid. Organic acids including citric, malic and succinic acid were contained in three organic additives. Phytohormones such as IAA, trans-ZR and ABA were detected only in coconut water.
Table 1 . Comparison of nutrient constituents in coconut water, birch and maple sap added to the culture medium.
Nutrient constituents | Coconut water (100g) | Birch sap (100g) | Maple sap (100g) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sugars (g) | Total | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.8 |
Sucrose | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.3 | |
Glucose | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | |
Fructose | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.2 | |
Inorganic ions (mg) | Ca2+ | 24.2 | 58.6 | 63.4 |
Fe3+ | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.6 | |
Mg2+ | 25.3 | 11.3 | 14.5 | |
PO43- | 20.4 | 6.4 | 2.7 | |
K+ | 242.1 | 120.4 | 204.2 | |
Mn2+ | 0.1 | 1.1 | 3.3 | |
Cu2+ | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.7 | |
Na+ | 36.5 | 5.3 | 10.4 | |
SO42- | 21.4 | 31.2 | 38.8 | |
NO3- | 2.8 | 3.1 | 3.5 | |
Vitamins (mg) | Thiamin (VB1) | 0.03 | - | 0.01 |
Riboflavin (VB2) | 0.05 | - | 0.01 | |
Niacin (VB3) | 0.08 | - | 0.03 | |
Pantothenic acid (VB5) | 0.04 | - | 0.03 | |
Pyridoxine (VB6) | 0.03 | - | 0.002 | |
Myo-inositol | 0.01 | - | - | |
Ascorbic acid (VC) | 2.4 | 0.3 | 0.9 | |
Organic acids (mg) | Malic | 289.3 | 359.1 | 141.7 |
Citric | 23.7 | 6.8 | 15.0 | |
Succinic | 8.4 | 11.5 | 12.2 | |
Phytohormones (nM) | IAA | 25.6 | - | - |
trans-ZR | 10.2 | - | - | |
ABA | 8.5 | - | - |
Table 2 explained the different effects of each organic additives on
Table 2 . Effects of organic additives on
Organic additives | Germination (%) | Protocorm formation (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Type (A) | Conc. (B) | ||
Coconut water | 0 ml·L-1 | 12.6 gz | 14.4 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 60.9 b | 62.0 b | |
100 ml·L-1 | 70.8 a | 74.2 a | |
200 ml·L-1 | 64.4 ab | 60.8 b | |
Birch sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 12.8 g | 13.1 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 55.8 c | 62.1 b | |
100 ml·L-1 | 65.2 ab | 68.2 ab | |
200 ml·L-1 | 56.9 c | 53.4 bc | |
Maple sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 10.9 g | 12.7 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 59.1 b | 60.5 b | |
100 ml·L-1 | 66.4 ab | 66.9 ab | |
200 ml·L-1 | 61.1 b | 61.4 b | |
Banana powder | 0 g·L-1 | 11.1 g | 12.2 e |
15 g·L-1 | 25.5 f | 21.3 de | |
30 g·L-1 | 30.6 ef | 35.4 d | |
60 g·L-1 | 36.8 e | 41.9 c | |
Peptone | 0 g·L-1 | 9.6 g | 10.3 e |
1 g·L-1 | 35.2 e | 38.2 cd | |
2 g·L-1 | 43.3 d | 43.7 c | |
4 g·L-1 | 40.9 d | 35.0 d | |
Significancey | |||
A | ** | ** | |
B | ** | ** | |
A×B | ** | ** |
zMean separation by Duncan’s multiple range test at
yNS, *, ** not significant or significant at
Table 3 . Effects of organic additives on the fresh and dry weight of seedlings developed from
Organic additives | Fresh weight (mg) | Dry weight (mg) | |
---|---|---|---|
Type (A) | Conc. (B) | ||
Coconut water | 0 ml·L-1 | 76.8 ez | 7.8 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 228.1 b | 24.2 bc | |
100 ml·L-1 | 296.4 a | 34.1 a | |
200 ml·L-1 | 221.9 b | 23.7 bc | |
Birch sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 65.3 e | 6.4 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 210.3 c | 21.9 c | |
100 ml·L-1 | 260.5 ab | 28.7 ab | |
200 ml·L-1 | 205.6 c | 22.0 c | |
Maple sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 71.4 e | 6.9 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 207.6 c | 22.4 c | |
100 ml·L-1 | 273.2 ab | 30.9 ab | |
200 ml·L-1 | 231.7 b | 25.5 b | |
Banana powder | 0 g·L-1 | 72.9 e | 7.2 e |
15 g·L-1 | 126.7 d | 13.3 d | |
30 g·L-1 | 178.4 cd | 18.6 cd | |
60 g·L-1 | 168.6 cd | 16.9 cd | |
Peptone | 0 g·L-1 | 68.4 e | 6.8 e |
1 g·L-1 | 135.1 d | 14.3 d | |
2 g·L-1 | 169.9 cd | 18.0 cd | |
4 g·L-1 | 173.3 cd | 18.2 cd | |
Significancey | |||
A | ** | ** | |
B | ** | ** | |
A×B | ** | ** |
zMean separation by Duncan’s multiple range test at
yNS, *, ** not significant or significant at
Table 4 . Effects of organic additives on the growth of seedlings developed from protocorm of
Organic additives | Root | Bud | |||||||
Type (A) | Conc. (B) | No. | Length (cm) | Diameter (mm) | Formation (%) | Length (cm) | Diameter (mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coconut water | 0 ml·L-1 | 3.1 d | 1.0 d | 1.0 a | 20.2 gz | 3.7 e | 1.4 b | ||
50 ml·L-1 | 6.7 ab | 2.7 b | 0.9 a | 62.5 c | 6.8 b | 2.0 a | |||
100 ml·L-1 | 7.1 a | 2.9 ab | 0.9 a | 74.6 a | 8.0 a | 2.1 a | |||
200 ml·L-1 | 7.0 a | 2.8 ab | 0.9 a | 69.5 abc | 8.1 a | 2.1 a | |||
Birch sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 3.2 d | 0.9 d | 0.8 a | 23.9 g | 3.9 e | 1.4 b | ||
50 ml·L-1 | 5.9 b | 2.6 b | 0.9 a | 57.1 cd | 6.4 bc | 1.7 ab | |||
100 ml·L-1 | 6.6 ab | 3.0 ab | 1.0 a | 70.4 ab | 7.8 a | 2.2 a | |||
200 ml·L-1 | 6.1 b | 2.7 b | 0.9 a | 67.3 b | 7.4 ab | 2.0 a | |||
Maple sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 3.2 d | 1.1 d | 1.0 a | 23.0 g | 3.5 e | 1.4 b | ||
50 ml·L-1 | 5.4 c | 2.5 b | 0.8 a | 61.1 c | 7.0 b | 1.6 ab | |||
100 ml·L-1 | 6.7 ab | 3.3 a | 0.9 a | 73.5 a | 7.9 a | 2.1 a | |||
200 ml·L-1 | 6.6 ab | 2.9 ab | 0.9 a | 68.0 b | 7.8 a | 2.1 a | |||
Banana powder | 0 g·L-1 | 3.0 d | 1.4 cd | 0.8 a | 21.3 g | 3.4 e | 1.3 b | ||
15 g·L-1 | 4.0 cd | 1.8 c | 1.0 a | 31.5 f | 4.2 de | 1.5 ab | |||
30 g·L-1 | 5.2 c | 2.1 bc | 1.0 a | 36.9 ef | 4.4 de | 1.6 ab | |||
60 g·L-1 | 4.6 cd | 1.7 c | 0.9 a | 29.0 f | 5.3 d | 1.5 ab | |||
Peptone | 0 g·L-1 | 2.8 d | 1.2 d | 1.0 a | 21.0 g | 3.7 e | 1.3 b | ||
1 g·L-1 | 4.4 cd | 1.9 c | 0.9 a | 44.2 e | 5.2 d | 1.6 ab | |||
2 g·L-1 | 5.1 c | 2.3 bc | 0.8 a | 56.8 cd | 6.0 c | 2.0 a | |||
4 g·L-1 | 4.5 cd | 1.9 c | 0.8 a | 52.6 d | 5.3 d | 1.9 a | |||
Significancey | |||||||||
A | ** | ** | NS | ** | ** | * | |||
B | * | ** | NS | ** | ** | * | |||
A×B | * | * | NS | ** | ** | NS |
zMean separation by Duncan’s multiple range test at
yNS, *, ** not significant or significant at
particular, the bud formation rates were raised up to 70%, and their length and diameter also increased by 2 and 1.5 times respectively. Similarly, the number and length of roots increased by 2 and 3 times individually. It was found that 100 ml·L-1 of coconut water or phloem sap showed the best response to the germination and protocorm development in the quarter-strength MS basal medium supplemented with 10 g·L-1 sucrose. The optimal osmotic potential should be maintained in culture medium for the successful
Morphology of seedlings developed from protocorms of
It is one of the advisable methods to use organic additives in orchid culture medium, because they have been reported to be an easy way to improvise the current plant tissue culture media towards commercial production (Ichihashi and Islam, 1999). As organic additives, coconut water, apple homogenate, banana homogenate, potato homogenate, date palm syrup, corn extract, papaya extract, beef extract, casein hydrolysate, pineapple extract, yeast extract, tryptone, peptone or pure amino acids such as glutamine were used successfully in orchid production (Islam et al. 2003; Murdad et al. 2010; Pyati et al. 2002; Rasmussen 1995). They possess a wide spectrum of growth factors, resulting in the beneficial effects producing more PLBs, shoots and leaves (Akter et al. 2007), increasing the size of somatic embryos (Al-Khateeb 2008) and promoting the development of asymbiotic seeds as well as regeneration of plantlets (Tawaro et al. 2008).
Coconut water was reported to promote the development of orchid tubers and roots (Mclntyre et al. 1974; Rasmussen 1995). 100 ml·L-1 coconut water extracted from a fully ripe coconut could induce the germination of
Coconut water is the colorless liquid endosperm of green coconuts (
In conclusion, our results demonstrated that the organic additives including the phloem sap such as birch and maple sap as well as coconut water could promote the seed germination, increase the protocorm formation and led the vigorous seedling growth of
Morphology of seedlings developed from protocorms of
Table 1 . Comparison of nutrient constituents in coconut water, birch and maple sap added to the culture medium.
Nutrient constituents | Coconut water (100g) | Birch sap (100g) | Maple sap (100g) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sugars (g) | Total | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.8 |
Sucrose | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.3 | |
Glucose | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | |
Fructose | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.2 | |
Inorganic ions (mg) | Ca2+ | 24.2 | 58.6 | 63.4 |
Fe3+ | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.6 | |
Mg2+ | 25.3 | 11.3 | 14.5 | |
PO43- | 20.4 | 6.4 | 2.7 | |
K+ | 242.1 | 120.4 | 204.2 | |
Mn2+ | 0.1 | 1.1 | 3.3 | |
Cu2+ | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.7 | |
Na+ | 36.5 | 5.3 | 10.4 | |
SO42- | 21.4 | 31.2 | 38.8 | |
NO3- | 2.8 | 3.1 | 3.5 | |
Vitamins (mg) | Thiamin (VB1) | 0.03 | - | 0.01 |
Riboflavin (VB2) | 0.05 | - | 0.01 | |
Niacin (VB3) | 0.08 | - | 0.03 | |
Pantothenic acid (VB5) | 0.04 | - | 0.03 | |
Pyridoxine (VB6) | 0.03 | - | 0.002 | |
Myo-inositol | 0.01 | - | - | |
Ascorbic acid (VC) | 2.4 | 0.3 | 0.9 | |
Organic acids (mg) | Malic | 289.3 | 359.1 | 141.7 |
Citric | 23.7 | 6.8 | 15.0 | |
Succinic | 8.4 | 11.5 | 12.2 | |
Phytohormones (nM) | IAA | 25.6 | - | - |
trans-ZR | 10.2 | - | - | |
ABA | 8.5 | - | - |
Table 2 . Effects of organic additives on
Organic additives | Germination (%) | Protocorm formation (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Type (A) | Conc. (B) | ||
Coconut water | 0 ml·L-1 | 12.6 gz | 14.4 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 60.9 b | 62.0 b | |
100 ml·L-1 | 70.8 a | 74.2 a | |
200 ml·L-1 | 64.4 ab | 60.8 b | |
Birch sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 12.8 g | 13.1 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 55.8 c | 62.1 b | |
100 ml·L-1 | 65.2 ab | 68.2 ab | |
200 ml·L-1 | 56.9 c | 53.4 bc | |
Maple sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 10.9 g | 12.7 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 59.1 b | 60.5 b | |
100 ml·L-1 | 66.4 ab | 66.9 ab | |
200 ml·L-1 | 61.1 b | 61.4 b | |
Banana powder | 0 g·L-1 | 11.1 g | 12.2 e |
15 g·L-1 | 25.5 f | 21.3 de | |
30 g·L-1 | 30.6 ef | 35.4 d | |
60 g·L-1 | 36.8 e | 41.9 c | |
Peptone | 0 g·L-1 | 9.6 g | 10.3 e |
1 g·L-1 | 35.2 e | 38.2 cd | |
2 g·L-1 | 43.3 d | 43.7 c | |
4 g·L-1 | 40.9 d | 35.0 d | |
Significancey | |||
A | ** | ** | |
B | ** | ** | |
A×B | ** | ** |
zMean separation by Duncan’s multiple range test at
yNS, *, ** not significant or significant at
Table 3 . Effects of organic additives on the fresh and dry weight of seedlings developed from
Organic additives | Fresh weight (mg) | Dry weight (mg) | |
---|---|---|---|
Type (A) | Conc. (B) | ||
Coconut water | 0 ml·L-1 | 76.8 ez | 7.8 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 228.1 b | 24.2 bc | |
100 ml·L-1 | 296.4 a | 34.1 a | |
200 ml·L-1 | 221.9 b | 23.7 bc | |
Birch sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 65.3 e | 6.4 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 210.3 c | 21.9 c | |
100 ml·L-1 | 260.5 ab | 28.7 ab | |
200 ml·L-1 | 205.6 c | 22.0 c | |
Maple sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 71.4 e | 6.9 e |
50 ml·L-1 | 207.6 c | 22.4 c | |
100 ml·L-1 | 273.2 ab | 30.9 ab | |
200 ml·L-1 | 231.7 b | 25.5 b | |
Banana powder | 0 g·L-1 | 72.9 e | 7.2 e |
15 g·L-1 | 126.7 d | 13.3 d | |
30 g·L-1 | 178.4 cd | 18.6 cd | |
60 g·L-1 | 168.6 cd | 16.9 cd | |
Peptone | 0 g·L-1 | 68.4 e | 6.8 e |
1 g·L-1 | 135.1 d | 14.3 d | |
2 g·L-1 | 169.9 cd | 18.0 cd | |
4 g·L-1 | 173.3 cd | 18.2 cd | |
Significancey | |||
A | ** | ** | |
B | ** | ** | |
A×B | ** | ** |
zMean separation by Duncan’s multiple range test at
yNS, *, ** not significant or significant at
Table 4 . Effects of organic additives on the growth of seedlings developed from protocorm of
Organic additives | Root | Bud | |||||||
Type (A) | Conc. (B) | No. | Length (cm) | Diameter (mm) | Formation (%) | Length (cm) | Diameter (mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coconut water | 0 ml·L-1 | 3.1 d | 1.0 d | 1.0 a | 20.2 gz | 3.7 e | 1.4 b | ||
50 ml·L-1 | 6.7 ab | 2.7 b | 0.9 a | 62.5 c | 6.8 b | 2.0 a | |||
100 ml·L-1 | 7.1 a | 2.9 ab | 0.9 a | 74.6 a | 8.0 a | 2.1 a | |||
200 ml·L-1 | 7.0 a | 2.8 ab | 0.9 a | 69.5 abc | 8.1 a | 2.1 a | |||
Birch sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 3.2 d | 0.9 d | 0.8 a | 23.9 g | 3.9 e | 1.4 b | ||
50 ml·L-1 | 5.9 b | 2.6 b | 0.9 a | 57.1 cd | 6.4 bc | 1.7 ab | |||
100 ml·L-1 | 6.6 ab | 3.0 ab | 1.0 a | 70.4 ab | 7.8 a | 2.2 a | |||
200 ml·L-1 | 6.1 b | 2.7 b | 0.9 a | 67.3 b | 7.4 ab | 2.0 a | |||
Maple sap | 0 ml·L-1 | 3.2 d | 1.1 d | 1.0 a | 23.0 g | 3.5 e | 1.4 b | ||
50 ml·L-1 | 5.4 c | 2.5 b | 0.8 a | 61.1 c | 7.0 b | 1.6 ab | |||
100 ml·L-1 | 6.7 ab | 3.3 a | 0.9 a | 73.5 a | 7.9 a | 2.1 a | |||
200 ml·L-1 | 6.6 ab | 2.9 ab | 0.9 a | 68.0 b | 7.8 a | 2.1 a | |||
Banana powder | 0 g·L-1 | 3.0 d | 1.4 cd | 0.8 a | 21.3 g | 3.4 e | 1.3 b | ||
15 g·L-1 | 4.0 cd | 1.8 c | 1.0 a | 31.5 f | 4.2 de | 1.5 ab | |||
30 g·L-1 | 5.2 c | 2.1 bc | 1.0 a | 36.9 ef | 4.4 de | 1.6 ab | |||
60 g·L-1 | 4.6 cd | 1.7 c | 0.9 a | 29.0 f | 5.3 d | 1.5 ab | |||
Peptone | 0 g·L-1 | 2.8 d | 1.2 d | 1.0 a | 21.0 g | 3.7 e | 1.3 b | ||
1 g·L-1 | 4.4 cd | 1.9 c | 0.9 a | 44.2 e | 5.2 d | 1.6 ab | |||
2 g·L-1 | 5.1 c | 2.3 bc | 0.8 a | 56.8 cd | 6.0 c | 2.0 a | |||
4 g·L-1 | 4.5 cd | 1.9 c | 0.8 a | 52.6 d | 5.3 d | 1.9 a | |||
Significancey | |||||||||
A | ** | ** | NS | ** | ** | * | |||
B | * | ** | NS | ** | ** | * | |||
A×B | * | * | NS | ** | ** | NS |
zMean separation by Duncan’s multiple range test at
yNS, *, ** not significant or significant at
Yoon Sun Huh, Joung Kwan Lee, Sang Young Nam, Eui Yon Hong, Kee Yoeup Paek, and Sung Won Son
Journal of Plant Biotechnology 2016; 43(1): 132-137Phyo Phyo Win Pe ・Swum Yi Kyua ・Aung Htay Naing ・Kyeung Il Park ・Mi‑Young Chung ・Chang Kil Kim
J Plant Biotechnol 2020; 47(3): 203-208Pil Son Choi · Young Jin Lee · Young Beob Yu · Myung Suk Choi
J Plant Biotechnol 2019; 46(4): 318-322
Journal of
Plant BiotechnologyMorphology of seedlings developed from protocorms of