J Plant Biotechnol (2023) 50:207-214
Published online November 13, 2023
https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2023.50.026.207
© The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology
Correspondence to : e-mail: jaychoi@cnu.ac.kr
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Lindera obtusiloba (Lauraceae) is a dioecious tree that is widely distributed in the low-altitude montane forests of East Asia, including Korea. Despite its various pharmacological properties and ornamental value, the genetic diversity and population structure of this species in Korea have not been explored. In this study, we selected 6 nuclear and 6 chloroplast microsatellite markers with polymorphism or clean cross-amplification and used these markers to perform genetic diversity and population structure analyses of L. obtusiloba samples collected from 20 geographical regions. Using these 12 markers, we identified a total of 44 alleles, ranging from 1 to 8 per locus, and the average observed and expected heterozygosity values were 0.11 and 0.44, respectively. The average polymorphism information content was 0.39. Genetic relationship and population structure analyses revealed that the natural L. obtusiloba population in Korea is composed of 2 clusters, possibly due to two different plastid genotypes. The same clustering patterns have also been observed in Lindera species in mainland China and Japan.
Keywords Dioecy, Genetic diversity, Lindera obtusiloba, Microsatellites, Population structure
Tissue extracts of
Microsatellites, also often referred to as simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and short tandem repeats (STRs), are highly informative DNA markers due to their high degree of polymorphism, codominant mode of inheritance, and their wide distribution on nuclear/organelle genomes. Microsatellite markers have been widely used for various molecular genetic analyses, including genetic diversity studies and population structure analysis (Ahn et al. 2021; Chung et al. 2019; Kim et al. 2016a). Polymorphic nuclear or chloroplast microsatellite loci have already been reported for
Although
Leaf tissues of
Nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers were previously developed from
To determine genotypes of the selected polymorphic microsatellite loci, forward primers were labelled with a virtual dye (6-FAM; Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The PCR reaction and cycling conditions were the same as those reported previously (Kim et al. 2016a). Fragment analysis of the PCR products followed the previous report (Kim et al. 2016a). Briefly, 0.2 µL of PCR product was mixed with 9.8 µL Hi-Di formamide (Applied Biosystems) and 0.2 µL of the GeneScan™ 500 LIZ® size standard (Applied Biosystems). The mixture was denatured at 95°C for 5 min and placed on ice. The amplified fragments were separated by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI 3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems) using a 50-cm capillary with the pre-installed DS-33 dye set. Allele size and number were called using the GeneMapper software (ver. 4.0; Applied Biosystems).
Genetic parameters such as major allele frequency (MAF), number of alleles (NA), genetic diversity (GD, often referred to as expected heterozygosity), observed heterozygosity (HO), and polymorphic information content (PIC) were measured by calculating the shared allele frequencies using the PowerMarker software (v. 3.25) (Liu and Muse 2005). An unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) dendrogram was created using MEGA software (v. 7.0) (Kumar et al. 2016), which is embedded in PowerMarker, using the UPGMA algorithm.
Model-based methods of the STRUCTURE software (v. 2.3.4; Pritchard et al. 2000) were used to analyze the population structure of the collection in this study. The input data of PowerMarker software were appropriately converted into the input data form of the STRUCTURE software using the CONVERT software (v. 1.31). For population structure analysis, number of the sub-population labeled with
To select microsatellite loci with polymorphism, cross- amplification, clean PCR amplicons, and high PCR efficiency, we applied 17 marker candidates (10 nuclear markers and 7 chloroplast markers) to 1 representative individual from each of 8 different populations (21LO11-1, 21LO12-1, 21LO13-1, 21LO14-1, 21LO15-1, 21LO16-1, 21LO21-1, and 21LO22-1) (data not shown). Of 10 nuclear markers that were developed from
Table 1 . Nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers used for genotyping of
Locus name | Primer name | Primer sequence (5’ to 3’) | Repeat motif | GenBank acc. no. | Source species | Location | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LbA7 | LbA7-F | AAAACGGATCAGATACTCCC | (AC)13 | EF193199 | Nuclear | Edwards and Nissenbaum 2007 | |
LbA7-R | GCAGCATTATTGGGTTAGTG | ||||||
LbB105 | LbB105-F | ACAGGTCTTGACTTTGGGATAT | (GA)11 | EF193201 | |||
LbB105-R | GGATGGCTTATGGAGTGG | ||||||
LbB122 | LbB122-F | TGCTCAAGGAGAGATTCAAC | (AG)17 | EF193202 | |||
LbB122-R | CTCAGCCGAGTCTACTATCG | ||||||
LbC10 | LbC10-F | TTCCTAAACCCTGTTGTAAAAC | (AAG)15 | EF193204 | |||
LbC10-R | GCCAATCATGTGACTATTGTC | ||||||
LbC101 | LbC101-F | GCCTGATTCCACATAAATTG | (AAG)8 | EF193205 | |||
LbC101-R | AGAAACCAGTGGTCGAAATAC | ||||||
LbD6 | LbD6-F | CGTTAGGATACAAAGACCAGAG | (ATG)11 | EF193208 | |||
LbD6-R | ATCACACCCTCAAATCATAGTC | ||||||
LAG20 | LAG20-F | TGGCCGTTGTTCCTTATTTC | (A)12 | Cp genome NC_045262.1 | Ye and Li 2019 | ||
LAG20-R | CAACCCAATCCTTGTTTTGC | ||||||
LAG9 | LAG9-F | GGAAGCGGCAGAAATCAAT | (A)11 | ||||
LAG9-R | CAAAGACTCCACGGATAGGAA | ||||||
LAG24 | LAG24-F | TGCATCATGTGAGAATCCAAA | (T)15 | ||||
LAG24-R | TCACAAACAAACGGATCGAG | ||||||
LAG29 | LAG29-F | ATGGCCAAAATGAACTCCTG | (T)15 | ||||
LAG29-R | CGGTCAATCTCCGGTAGAAG | ||||||
LAG31 | LAG31-F | GGCTCCTGTAACCGTGTCAT | (T)11 | ||||
LAG31-R | GATGCCCCTGACTCTGACAT | ||||||
LAG32 | LAG32-F | GTAACCCCGCCAAGAATGTA | (T)9 | ||||
LAG32-R | ATACACAGTTGCCCCTTGGA |
To evaluate the genetic diversity of the natural population of
Table 2 . Characteristics of the 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci in the collected
Locus | SS | NOBS | Availability | NG | MAF | NA | GD | Heterozygosity | PIC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LbA7 | 100 | 98.00 | 0.98 | 17.00 | 0.39 | 8.00 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.67 |
LbB105 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
LbB122 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.61 | 2.00 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.36 |
LbC10 | 100 | 99.00 | 0.99 | 4.00 | 0.92 | 3.00 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
LbC101 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.96 | 2.00 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
LbD6 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
LAG20 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.53 | 3.00 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
LAG9 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.47 | 3.00 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
LAG24 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 0.50 | 6.00 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
LAG29 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 4.00 | 0.51 | 4.00 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
LAG31 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 0.42 | 5.00 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
LAG32 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 0.45 | 6.00 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
Mean | 100 | 99.75 | 1.00 | 4.67 | 0.65 | 3.67 | 0.44 | 0.11 | 0.39 |
SS, sample size; NOBS, number of observations; Availability is defined as 1-OBS/n, where OBS is the number of observations and n is the number of individuals sampled; NG, genotype number; MAF, major allele frequency; NA, number of alleles; GD, genetic diversity (often referred to as expected heterozygosity), defined as the probability that two randomly chosen alleles from the population are different; Heterozygosity is the simple proportion of heterozygous individuals in the population; PIC, polymorphism information content.
A total of 44 alleles derived from the 12 microsatellite loci were used to evaluate genetic relationships among the accessions from 20 populations. A UPGMA dendrogram was constructed based on the genetic similarity matrices among the accessions. Fig. 2 illustrates the results of the cluster analysis based on nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite data. The resulting tree reveals that the Korean
The population structure of 100 accessions from 20 natural vegetation samples based on 12 microsatellite markers was inferred from the Bayesian approach using the software STRUCTURE (v. 2.3.4). Individual proportions of membership in each group were estimated using a multi-allele data set and the results revealed the existence of several population structures. The distribution of L(K) did not show a clear mode for the true
According to fossil studies,
Sexual reproduction is predominant in angiosperms. However, some groups of sexual plants can reproduce asexually via apomixis, which produces exact genetic replicas of maternal plants (Xu et al. 2022).
Analyses of genetic diversity and population structure using microsatellite markers revealed that the natural population of
It is widely believed that plastid genomes are inherited from the maternal parent (Bock 2007). Although the inheritance mode of plastid DNA in
Although 10 nuclear markers were developed from
This study was carried out with the support of R&D Program for Forest Science Technology (Project No. 2022 462A00-2324-0201) provided by Korea Forest Service (Korea Forestry Promotion Institute). The authors would like to thank Dr. Jinsu Gil for his helpful advice on the population structure analysis.
J Plant Biotechnol 2023; 50(1): 207-214
Published online November 13, 2023 https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2023.50.026.207
Copyright © The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology.
Ho Bang Kim・Hye-Young Lee・Mi Sun Lee・Yi Lee・Youngtae Choi・Sung-Yeol Kim・Jaeyong Choi
Life Sciences Research Institute, Biomedic Co., Ltd., Bucheon 14548, Republic of Korea
Department of Environmental Horticulture, School of Equine Science and Horticulture, Cheju Halla University, Jeju 63092, Republic of Korea
Department of Industrial Plant Science and Technology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
Division of Forest Diversity, Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon 11186, Republic of Korea
Enfield Co., Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea
Department of Environment and Forest Resources, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea
Correspondence to:e-mail: jaychoi@cnu.ac.kr
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Lindera obtusiloba (Lauraceae) is a dioecious tree that is widely distributed in the low-altitude montane forests of East Asia, including Korea. Despite its various pharmacological properties and ornamental value, the genetic diversity and population structure of this species in Korea have not been explored. In this study, we selected 6 nuclear and 6 chloroplast microsatellite markers with polymorphism or clean cross-amplification and used these markers to perform genetic diversity and population structure analyses of L. obtusiloba samples collected from 20 geographical regions. Using these 12 markers, we identified a total of 44 alleles, ranging from 1 to 8 per locus, and the average observed and expected heterozygosity values were 0.11 and 0.44, respectively. The average polymorphism information content was 0.39. Genetic relationship and population structure analyses revealed that the natural L. obtusiloba population in Korea is composed of 2 clusters, possibly due to two different plastid genotypes. The same clustering patterns have also been observed in Lindera species in mainland China and Japan.
Keywords: Dioecy, Genetic diversity, Lindera obtusiloba, Microsatellites, Population structure
Tissue extracts of
Microsatellites, also often referred to as simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and short tandem repeats (STRs), are highly informative DNA markers due to their high degree of polymorphism, codominant mode of inheritance, and their wide distribution on nuclear/organelle genomes. Microsatellite markers have been widely used for various molecular genetic analyses, including genetic diversity studies and population structure analysis (Ahn et al. 2021; Chung et al. 2019; Kim et al. 2016a). Polymorphic nuclear or chloroplast microsatellite loci have already been reported for
Although
Leaf tissues of
Nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers were previously developed from
To determine genotypes of the selected polymorphic microsatellite loci, forward primers were labelled with a virtual dye (6-FAM; Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The PCR reaction and cycling conditions were the same as those reported previously (Kim et al. 2016a). Fragment analysis of the PCR products followed the previous report (Kim et al. 2016a). Briefly, 0.2 µL of PCR product was mixed with 9.8 µL Hi-Di formamide (Applied Biosystems) and 0.2 µL of the GeneScan™ 500 LIZ® size standard (Applied Biosystems). The mixture was denatured at 95°C for 5 min and placed on ice. The amplified fragments were separated by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI 3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems) using a 50-cm capillary with the pre-installed DS-33 dye set. Allele size and number were called using the GeneMapper software (ver. 4.0; Applied Biosystems).
Genetic parameters such as major allele frequency (MAF), number of alleles (NA), genetic diversity (GD, often referred to as expected heterozygosity), observed heterozygosity (HO), and polymorphic information content (PIC) were measured by calculating the shared allele frequencies using the PowerMarker software (v. 3.25) (Liu and Muse 2005). An unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) dendrogram was created using MEGA software (v. 7.0) (Kumar et al. 2016), which is embedded in PowerMarker, using the UPGMA algorithm.
Model-based methods of the STRUCTURE software (v. 2.3.4; Pritchard et al. 2000) were used to analyze the population structure of the collection in this study. The input data of PowerMarker software were appropriately converted into the input data form of the STRUCTURE software using the CONVERT software (v. 1.31). For population structure analysis, number of the sub-population labeled with
To select microsatellite loci with polymorphism, cross- amplification, clean PCR amplicons, and high PCR efficiency, we applied 17 marker candidates (10 nuclear markers and 7 chloroplast markers) to 1 representative individual from each of 8 different populations (21LO11-1, 21LO12-1, 21LO13-1, 21LO14-1, 21LO15-1, 21LO16-1, 21LO21-1, and 21LO22-1) (data not shown). Of 10 nuclear markers that were developed from
Table 1 . Nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers used for genotyping of
Locus name | Primer name | Primer sequence (5’ to 3’) | Repeat motif | GenBank acc. no. | Source species | Location | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LbA7 | LbA7-F | AAAACGGATCAGATACTCCC | (AC)13 | EF193199 | Nuclear | Edwards and Nissenbaum 2007 | |
LbA7-R | GCAGCATTATTGGGTTAGTG | ||||||
LbB105 | LbB105-F | ACAGGTCTTGACTTTGGGATAT | (GA)11 | EF193201 | |||
LbB105-R | GGATGGCTTATGGAGTGG | ||||||
LbB122 | LbB122-F | TGCTCAAGGAGAGATTCAAC | (AG)17 | EF193202 | |||
LbB122-R | CTCAGCCGAGTCTACTATCG | ||||||
LbC10 | LbC10-F | TTCCTAAACCCTGTTGTAAAAC | (AAG)15 | EF193204 | |||
LbC10-R | GCCAATCATGTGACTATTGTC | ||||||
LbC101 | LbC101-F | GCCTGATTCCACATAAATTG | (AAG)8 | EF193205 | |||
LbC101-R | AGAAACCAGTGGTCGAAATAC | ||||||
LbD6 | LbD6-F | CGTTAGGATACAAAGACCAGAG | (ATG)11 | EF193208 | |||
LbD6-R | ATCACACCCTCAAATCATAGTC | ||||||
LAG20 | LAG20-F | TGGCCGTTGTTCCTTATTTC | (A)12 | Cp genome NC_045262.1 | Ye and Li 2019 | ||
LAG20-R | CAACCCAATCCTTGTTTTGC | ||||||
LAG9 | LAG9-F | GGAAGCGGCAGAAATCAAT | (A)11 | ||||
LAG9-R | CAAAGACTCCACGGATAGGAA | ||||||
LAG24 | LAG24-F | TGCATCATGTGAGAATCCAAA | (T)15 | ||||
LAG24-R | TCACAAACAAACGGATCGAG | ||||||
LAG29 | LAG29-F | ATGGCCAAAATGAACTCCTG | (T)15 | ||||
LAG29-R | CGGTCAATCTCCGGTAGAAG | ||||||
LAG31 | LAG31-F | GGCTCCTGTAACCGTGTCAT | (T)11 | ||||
LAG31-R | GATGCCCCTGACTCTGACAT | ||||||
LAG32 | LAG32-F | GTAACCCCGCCAAGAATGTA | (T)9 | ||||
LAG32-R | ATACACAGTTGCCCCTTGGA |
To evaluate the genetic diversity of the natural population of
Table 2 . Characteristics of the 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci in the collected
Locus | SS | NOBS | Availability | NG | MAF | NA | GD | Heterozygosity | PIC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LbA7 | 100 | 98.00 | 0.98 | 17.00 | 0.39 | 8.00 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.67 |
LbB105 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
LbB122 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.61 | 2.00 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.36 |
LbC10 | 100 | 99.00 | 0.99 | 4.00 | 0.92 | 3.00 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
LbC101 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.96 | 2.00 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
LbD6 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
LAG20 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.53 | 3.00 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
LAG9 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.47 | 3.00 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
LAG24 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 0.50 | 6.00 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
LAG29 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 4.00 | 0.51 | 4.00 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
LAG31 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 0.42 | 5.00 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
LAG32 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 0.45 | 6.00 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
Mean | 100 | 99.75 | 1.00 | 4.67 | 0.65 | 3.67 | 0.44 | 0.11 | 0.39 |
SS, sample size; NOBS, number of observations; Availability is defined as 1-OBS/n, where OBS is the number of observations and n is the number of individuals sampled; NG, genotype number; MAF, major allele frequency; NA, number of alleles; GD, genetic diversity (often referred to as expected heterozygosity), defined as the probability that two randomly chosen alleles from the population are different; Heterozygosity is the simple proportion of heterozygous individuals in the population; PIC, polymorphism information content..
A total of 44 alleles derived from the 12 microsatellite loci were used to evaluate genetic relationships among the accessions from 20 populations. A UPGMA dendrogram was constructed based on the genetic similarity matrices among the accessions. Fig. 2 illustrates the results of the cluster analysis based on nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite data. The resulting tree reveals that the Korean
The population structure of 100 accessions from 20 natural vegetation samples based on 12 microsatellite markers was inferred from the Bayesian approach using the software STRUCTURE (v. 2.3.4). Individual proportions of membership in each group were estimated using a multi-allele data set and the results revealed the existence of several population structures. The distribution of L(K) did not show a clear mode for the true
According to fossil studies,
Sexual reproduction is predominant in angiosperms. However, some groups of sexual plants can reproduce asexually via apomixis, which produces exact genetic replicas of maternal plants (Xu et al. 2022).
Analyses of genetic diversity and population structure using microsatellite markers revealed that the natural population of
It is widely believed that plastid genomes are inherited from the maternal parent (Bock 2007). Although the inheritance mode of plastid DNA in
Although 10 nuclear markers were developed from
This study was carried out with the support of R&D Program for Forest Science Technology (Project No. 2022 462A00-2324-0201) provided by Korea Forest Service (Korea Forestry Promotion Institute). The authors would like to thank Dr. Jinsu Gil for his helpful advice on the population structure analysis.
Table 1 . Nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers used for genotyping of
Locus name | Primer name | Primer sequence (5’ to 3’) | Repeat motif | GenBank acc. no. | Source species | Location | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LbA7 | LbA7-F | AAAACGGATCAGATACTCCC | (AC)13 | EF193199 | Nuclear | Edwards and Nissenbaum 2007 | |
LbA7-R | GCAGCATTATTGGGTTAGTG | ||||||
LbB105 | LbB105-F | ACAGGTCTTGACTTTGGGATAT | (GA)11 | EF193201 | |||
LbB105-R | GGATGGCTTATGGAGTGG | ||||||
LbB122 | LbB122-F | TGCTCAAGGAGAGATTCAAC | (AG)17 | EF193202 | |||
LbB122-R | CTCAGCCGAGTCTACTATCG | ||||||
LbC10 | LbC10-F | TTCCTAAACCCTGTTGTAAAAC | (AAG)15 | EF193204 | |||
LbC10-R | GCCAATCATGTGACTATTGTC | ||||||
LbC101 | LbC101-F | GCCTGATTCCACATAAATTG | (AAG)8 | EF193205 | |||
LbC101-R | AGAAACCAGTGGTCGAAATAC | ||||||
LbD6 | LbD6-F | CGTTAGGATACAAAGACCAGAG | (ATG)11 | EF193208 | |||
LbD6-R | ATCACACCCTCAAATCATAGTC | ||||||
LAG20 | LAG20-F | TGGCCGTTGTTCCTTATTTC | (A)12 | Cp genome NC_045262.1 | Ye and Li 2019 | ||
LAG20-R | CAACCCAATCCTTGTTTTGC | ||||||
LAG9 | LAG9-F | GGAAGCGGCAGAAATCAAT | (A)11 | ||||
LAG9-R | CAAAGACTCCACGGATAGGAA | ||||||
LAG24 | LAG24-F | TGCATCATGTGAGAATCCAAA | (T)15 | ||||
LAG24-R | TCACAAACAAACGGATCGAG | ||||||
LAG29 | LAG29-F | ATGGCCAAAATGAACTCCTG | (T)15 | ||||
LAG29-R | CGGTCAATCTCCGGTAGAAG | ||||||
LAG31 | LAG31-F | GGCTCCTGTAACCGTGTCAT | (T)11 | ||||
LAG31-R | GATGCCCCTGACTCTGACAT | ||||||
LAG32 | LAG32-F | GTAACCCCGCCAAGAATGTA | (T)9 | ||||
LAG32-R | ATACACAGTTGCCCCTTGGA |
Table 2 . Characteristics of the 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci in the collected
Locus | SS | NOBS | Availability | NG | MAF | NA | GD | Heterozygosity | PIC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LbA7 | 100 | 98.00 | 0.98 | 17.00 | 0.39 | 8.00 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.67 |
LbB105 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
LbB122 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.61 | 2.00 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.36 |
LbC10 | 100 | 99.00 | 0.99 | 4.00 | 0.92 | 3.00 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
LbC101 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.96 | 2.00 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
LbD6 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
LAG20 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.53 | 3.00 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
LAG9 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 0.47 | 3.00 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
LAG24 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 0.50 | 6.00 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
LAG29 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 4.00 | 0.51 | 4.00 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
LAG31 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 0.42 | 5.00 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
LAG32 | 100 | 100.00 | 1.00 | 6.00 | 0.45 | 6.00 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
Mean | 100 | 99.75 | 1.00 | 4.67 | 0.65 | 3.67 | 0.44 | 0.11 | 0.39 |
SS, sample size; NOBS, number of observations; Availability is defined as 1-OBS/n, where OBS is the number of observations and n is the number of individuals sampled; NG, genotype number; MAF, major allele frequency; NA, number of alleles; GD, genetic diversity (often referred to as expected heterozygosity), defined as the probability that two randomly chosen alleles from the population are different; Heterozygosity is the simple proportion of heterozygous individuals in the population; PIC, polymorphism information content..
Yurry Um, Mei-Lan Jin, Yi Lee, Mok Hur, Seon Woo Cha, Chan Sik Jung, Seong Min Kim, and Jeong-Hoon Lee
J Plant Biotechnol 2016; 43(2): 174-180Shipra Kumari · Young-Sun Kim · Bashistha Kumar Kanth · Ji-Young Jang · Geung-Joo Lee
J Plant Biotechnol 2019; 46(3): 158-164Kang Hee Cho, Bong Hee Han, Jeom Hwa Han, Seo Jun Park, Se Hee Kim, Han Chan Lee, Mi Young Kim, and Myung-Su Kim
J Plant Biotechnol 2018; 45(4): 382-391
Journal of
Plant Biotechnology